HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #18701  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2024, 8:59 PM
wrendog's Avatar
wrendog wrendog is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 4,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by meman View Post
Hey Atlas, I was really blown away by the figures you provided from CBRE about office space in different cities

I cant believe Portland has more than twice the office space as salt lake and more office space than Austin.I think Portland and Salt lake are close to the same size so Im just wondering why the big discrepancy???
If my numbers are correct, it looks like 68 million sq feet in Portland metro

https://www.colliers.com/en/research...-market-report

And this report just has SLC and Provo at around 56 million sq feet

https://mktgdocs.cbre.com/2299/087d3...ce_Figures.pdf



Edit: I guess you just meant downtowns. but yeah, downtown PDX is much bigger than SLC, so makes sense to me. Downtown Austin has a ton of residential

Ogden has an additional 7 million, so total for the Wasatch Front is around 63 million which is comparable to Portland
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18702  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2024, 2:48 AM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,030
I've always wondered on these lists for office space, do they include only space that is leased or does it also include private space?

If it only includes the leased space, it does miss out on a decent amount of privately owned space such as the State owned offices, U of U owned office space, LDS Church office buildings, and Ensign College/Triad Complex.

This accounts for a large amount of space, even more once the City Center space is no longer leased and becomes fully occupied by the U.

If this space isn't included, it may show the SLC downtown area as losing even more space as office space is privatized or converted to residential over the next few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18703  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2024, 5:31 AM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,919
New 350-unit project at 523 W 200 N submitted to the portal, from the Boyer Company: "District North"





__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18704  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2024, 7:55 PM
Ironweed Ironweed is offline
Ironweed
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas View Post
New 350-unit project at 523 W 200 N submitted to the portal, from the Boyer Company: "District North"
This is a God-Send.

That area is a dive zone which has needed help for ever. Hopefully, this will act as a catalyst for the S-side of the block as well.

Any idea when groundbreaking happens, Atlas?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18705  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2024, 8:26 PM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,919
Idk, it needs to go through design review which could take awhile. There doesn't seem to be a lot of new stuff in the pipeline right now though, so it could be sooner than past projects. If they have their financing in place, then they just need to apply for building permits and such. Maybe 3-4 months at the earliest? May be longer, of course. That project on 400S/900E has been approved and reapproved for years and still hasn't started, despite Office Max shutting down. Same with the cursed tower site on 400S/West Temple.

Btw I drove by the BRIX project today and noticed that the entire west side is reddish/orange stucco. I thought it was supposed to be white. Is that temporary?
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC

Last edited by Atlas; Oct 29, 2024 at 2:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18706  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2024, 12:21 PM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,030
400-foot buildings on the west side? What the Miller Company wants in Fairpark
https://www.ksl.com/article/51164762...s-in-fairpark-

Quote:
SALT LAKE CITY — Major changes to downtown Salt Lake City could start taking shape as early as next year after city leaders approved a complex plan tied to Smith Entertainment Group's acquisition of a National Hockey League franchise.

However, city leaders are now tasked with reaching similar agreements for plans that would drastically change its west side and potentially draw in Major League Baseball.
Quote:
Design reviews would be required for any building over 200 feet, but the change would open the door for downtown-like height on the west side.

More concrete plans are already underway. The Miller Company is working with Rocky Mountain Power and an architectural firm on concepts for a new 160- to 180-foot tower in the area, according to Wade Budge, a partner at Snell and Wilner, the firm representing the Miller Company in the rezoning process.

"That's just one item we're dealing with right now," he said, noting the power utility company would make the tower its new headquarters.
It does seem that they want to hit the ground running starting early next year. This will be a boon to the area and will push North Temple developments even without an MLB team. I can see issues for the KOA and the trailer court nearby. The KOA is at bigger risk due to its proximity to North Temple while the trailer court is back a bit from the street so may not be impacted for a bit.

Even without this North Temple would continue to change with the coming 2nd Trax route and updates to the Fair Park. This just gives an area a more unified and focused plan with higher heights than are currently allowed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18707  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2024, 2:48 PM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,919
Very nice. A 160-180 ft tower is really going to stand out at that location and be an anchor for future development.

400 ft at that location may be too big of an ask to the FAA.
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18708  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2024, 12:54 AM
rockies's Avatar
rockies rockies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Utah
Posts: 302
Is the church going to make us wait until temple square is done in 2026 before giving us renderings of the Harmons/200E lot? I hope we see more new projects soon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18709  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2024, 1:24 AM
rockies's Avatar
rockies rockies is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Utah
Posts: 302
I like to see this project and think it will be good infill. However, I think they should allow for towers along the entire north temple corridor between the power district and ~300W. This particular section of North Temple is really ripe for tall buildings and urban vibe imo. Great spots for towers next to north temple station, corners of 600W, 400W, 300W, WeWork building/parking lot, etc. It would be cool to have an urban canyon effect going east/west as far as the power district - even if heights are somewhat more restricted on the western end

Without the RGP, north temple station will continue to be the real salt lake central and some kind of flagship TOD with towers would fit in here. It seems like north temple station would have also been a great location for UTAs new HQ but that is besides the point. If anyone knows, I would be curious if the power district/SEG district will likely have impacts on surrounding zoning or if it will just be left the way it is (this is what I assume)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas View Post
New 350-unit project at 523 W 200 N submitted to the portal, from the Boyer Company: "District North"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18710  
Old Posted Yesterday, 11:16 PM
meman meman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 241
Main Street Apartments

Has anyone on this thread heard when the Main Street Apartament Tower might begin construction?
Hines keeps saying the the project is very much alive
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18711  
Old Posted Today, 1:42 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,659
Posted this to twitter but sharing here because it needs to happen:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18712  
Old Posted Today, 5:01 AM
MountainSkyline MountainSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Wasatch Front
Posts: 46
Yeah that would be amazing. I added the populations for reference
[IMG][/IMG]

Last edited by MountainSkyline; Today at 5:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18713  
Old Posted Today, 10:16 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,440
As someone who grew up in Magna (and whose family still live there), may I assure you that we do not want to be incorporated into Salt Lake City. Full stop.
  • That's why we voted for the original township proposition in 1996 (tossed out in court).
  • That's why we became a township in 2001.
  • That's why we became a Metro Township in 2017.
  • That's why we cheered Utah HB35 which granted incorporation to a city.

A population of 30,000 is a respectable amount for a suburb that wishes to retain its local identity, thank you very much! (Magna has more people than South Salt Lake or Farmington). You can de-Borg us from your cube, please.
__________________
When even the freeway guy is concerned about a development, you know there's trouble!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18714  
Old Posted Today, 3:31 PM
freeshavocado freeshavocado is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 104
What benefit does SLC get from incorporating sprawled suburbs? Serious question.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.