HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1581  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2024, 10:00 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
You will be forced to sell lower if all your competitors can sell lower than you. Might as well pack up and leave the development business if you insist on selling at "market value".
If the market price drops, that is the new market price. That's why we're waiting on the sidelines right now for condo projects so we can sell at a price that covers costs. In fact getting rid of the lower QE viewcone has allowed a fiends condo project to exits at all. I'll be keeping an eye on what they market for.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1582  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2024, 5:27 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
96 replies = "mountain of rage" The deluded world of thinking in your little echo chamber.
Also, the media is running with THE most over-used phrase in its headlines: OUTRAGE...

__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1583  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2024, 6:33 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
If the market price drops, that is the new market price. That's why we're waiting on the sidelines right now for condo projects so we can sell at a price that covers costs. In fact getting rid of the lower QE viewcone has allowed a fiends condo project to exits at all. I'll be keeping an eye on what they market for.
Our "market value" is artificially inflated with the limited developable lands and municipal height, zoning and other restrictions. Hence, with all these removed, competition can actually lower prices. Viewcones is one major obstacle.

However, like I said before, we missed the best time to build more, while suburb cities have been more successful in doing this. Construction costs post-Covid, mortgage rates and the dwindling economy make it harder now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1584  
Old Posted Yesterday, 9:53 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,843
Greystar Proposes Rental Towers After Buying Science World McDonald's For $80M
https://storeys.com/greystar-1527-ma...eet-vancouver/

For 1527 Main Street in Vancouver, Greystar is proposing a 22-storey and 18-storey rental tower with a total of 371 units.
By Howard Chai September 17, 2024 04:45 PM

"Less than a year after making the high-profile purchase, international real estate development and management firm Greystar Real Estate Partners has submitted its rezoning application to the City of Vancouver, which the City published on Monday.

The subject site of the proposal is 1527 Main Street in Vancouver, which is currently occupied by a standalone McDonald's and its surface parking lot about a block away from the Expo Line SkyTrain's Main Street-Science World Station. ...

Of note, Greystar says its proposal is in part made possible by the recent revisions and eliminations of certain view cones.

"The modernization of Main Street View Cone (22) and elimination of Queen Elizabeth Park View Cone (3.2.4A) allows the 22-story tower to be located on the eastern portion of the site, without impeding any protected views," the rezoning application notes."

Sounds like reigning in view cones is paying dividends.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1585  
Old Posted Yesterday, 9:58 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,937
I think it gave them an extra 6-storeys for the eastern side of the site
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1586  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:12 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 22,247
Would viewcones really limit things at this level? We're not talking about 40 stories here, just ~20 ish. How much taller will this be compared to Central and the VanCity building?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1587  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:42 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Would viewcones really limit things at this level? We're not talking about 40 stories here, just ~20 ish. How much taller will this be compared to Central and the VanCity building?
They raised the viewcone to the top of the tallest CityGate tower. I think Central is 22-storeys and 195 ft? So similar to the 18/22 storey towers (200-239 feet) in this development.

You can see the cutout on Central where it faces Main Street which is slightly lower than the rest of the floating box because of the old viewcone.

https://council.vancouver.ca/20040325/ph5.htm

Last edited by jollyburger; Yesterday at 10:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1588  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:50 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Vancity can be slightly taller because it's farther from the viewcone.
Looks like the old viewcone was to the east of the Vancity tower. The Plan said you can do 21-storeys just across the street to the south of Vancity. So 22 storeys isn't crazy.

The change was to the eastern portion of the macdonalds site
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:51 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.