Quote:
Originally Posted by F-Misthebest
|
I have nothing wrong with Sioux Falls personally, (It's a little too suburban for my tastes), and I will agree to disagree with anyone who says SF is "better" than F-M, as people have their own right to opinion. But whenever someone claims that SF is bigger, and I mention the latest figures to them, and they still refuse to believe it, that's when I get testy. I have personally met three people from SF on campus, and I've had the same problem with all of them. I tell them to check the CMSA's and urban areas on the census.gov website, but they refuse to believe it.
Sioux Falls is nice (for suburban familes, at least), but I think F-M is more of a cosmopolitan, city-type place with a more well-defined urban center. It's a place that's more friendly to the 20-something and college-aged crowd, let's put it that way. Hell, we probably get 10 times the number of major concerts to F-M than SF does, just by way of Playmaker's alone. As far as the bar and concert and college scene (basically the whole "fun scene"), it's no contest.
I think places like Hooters, Playmaker's and The Broken Axe are what sets us apart. Hell, I'm starting to meet young people my age who have moved down here from Winnipeg to find something more exciting. Winnipeg, of all places...