Quote:
Originally Posted by le calmar
I see how that could be confusing, especially for newcomers. I think most Canadians would be aware of the difference however. Just a note though, a city is generally considered "founded" when it becomes a permanent settlement. That happened in the 1630's in both cities. Otherwise we could say Toronto was founded in 1720 and Kingston in 1673 due to the temporary and/or military presence at the time, which is not accurate.
The information available on Wikipedia about the year of foundation is often wrong - for the longest time it was referencing the year 1497 as the year St. John's was founded, but I see someone finally edited it.
|
It’s a little hard to pin down Saint John’s exact founding date, and a little harder to pin down St. John’s’s. I just went with what was listed on Wikipedia.
I think it’s mainly confusing for people outside of Atlantic Canada, which is a bit of an issue to say the least for a city that has been trying to prioritize tourism and immigration. Essentially, it’s a lingering branding and marketing issue.
Personally, I think it’s confusing why St. John, NB went through all of the trouble and cost of a name change to Saint John, NB, around the turn of the 20th century well before Newfoundland even joined Canada, instead of
actually changing the name to something unique, and not just remove the abbreviation.
I think many Saint John area locals underestimate how confusing it is for many outside the region of Atlantic Canada, or rather more, just how little the rest of Canada cares about Saint John, New Brunswickers wanting them to fully spell out the name of their city to avoid being confused with St. John’s