HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #18401  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 5:30 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tombstoner View Post
Very nice building with classy proportions. I'm not crazy about the "schoolhouse red" brick--something a bit less bright might age better.
Agree. In a few shots it looks okay, but one of them i got the same sense that it won't age well.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18402  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 6:17 AM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 387
our vernacular (Chicago common) brick that 100 year-old buildings hide in their alleys would be much better than this facade. Seems like repeat of 800 w fulton market. why do we VE out any interesting brick in this part of town? what made us unable to produce this en masse? and seriously... what is with the stark red "brick?"

Last edited by Toasty Joe; Feb 26, 2021 at 7:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18403  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 2:22 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
our vernacular (Chicago common) brick that 100 year-old buildings hide in their alleys would be much better than this facade. Seems like repeat of 800 w fulton market. why do we VE out any interesting brick in this part of town? what made us unable to produce this en masse? and seriously... what is with the stark red "brick?"
The term VE is overused in this forum. They don't even make Chicago common brick anymore and haven't for 40 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18404  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 3:33 PM
Handro Handro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
The term VE is overused in this forum. They don't even make Chicago common brick anymore and haven't for 40 years.
How do they make this red brick (and the brick for 800 w fulton)? Is it the most readily available naturally occurring clay these days or is it some kind of process to mimic naturally occurring red brick? If its the latter, then it would be cool if they could use the same process to mimic Chicago common for Chicago buildings...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18405  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 4:07 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Handro View Post
How do they make this red brick (and the brick for 800 w fulton)? Is it the most readily available naturally occurring clay these days or is it some kind of process to mimic naturally occurring red brick? If its the latter, then it would be cool if they could use the same process to mimic Chicago common for Chicago buildings...
Chicago common isn't a color, it comes in a variety of colors, including red. What you see in the alleyways is cheap, uncolored brick because it wasn't facing the streets.

Feel free to read up: https://www.brickofchicago.com/chicagocommon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18406  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 4:28 PM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 387
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
Chicago common isn't a color, it comes in a variety of colors, including red. What you see in the alleyways is cheap, uncolored brick because it wasn't facing the streets.

Feel free to read up: https://www.brickofchicago.com/chicagocommon
exactly, and my original point was that this 100 year old cheap brick looks much better than the cheap-looking, stark red we've been seeing, especially when it's fake brick like 800 w fulton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18407  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 4:50 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 939
I think it is too early to say this is going to be cheap bricks, or cheap fake bricks. There are beautiful red bricks, just like there are beautiful cream, brown, gray black, etc. bricks. I would think (hope) that with an architect of the stature of Morris Adjmi the materials will be very good.

The very strong vertical piers are striking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18408  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 5:54 PM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 387
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrow View Post
I think it is too early to say this is going to be cheap bricks, or cheap fake bricks. There are beautiful red bricks, just like there are beautiful cream, brown, gray black, etc. bricks. I would think (hope) that with an architect of the stature of Morris Adjmi the materials will be very good.

The very strong vertical piers are striking.
agreed love the form, and I'm hopeful for the facade! In my opinion, being similar looking to the brick on 800 w fulton, 320 n sangamon, & some others wouldn't do this building justice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18409  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 8:05 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiPlanner View Post
Looks like a late-70s university library. The widths of the bays feel a touch too wide; you don't get the verticality and rhythm like you do from, say, the Merchandise Mart. Those piers are also chunky and severely square, and there aren't any decorative mullions to balance them out. And with the inevitable highly reflective glass, it's going to be a lot of flat, matte material and reflected light (the makings of a monolith). It could turn out well when actually built, of course, but something feels off about the rendered concept.

I can't imagine that the landmarks guidelines are so onerous as to limit creative interpretations to...

... that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18410  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 9:16 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
Looks like a late-70s university library.

YES!! Not sure it was meant as a positive, but I love it. Another way to describe this institutional, austere (as the W Loop neighborhood artist described) aesthetic. Maybe I'm just not the warm, fuzzy, let's-humanize-everything type. At any rate, more of this, please.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18411  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 7:12 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
Next month's Plan Commission agenda is up and spotted the affordable housing development planned for the SE corner of Lake & Damen has grown from 10 stories to 12 stories, 136 ft. The other high rise on the agenda is 160 N Elizabeth.

Agenda: https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/dept...n_Hearing.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18412  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 2:52 PM
bgsrand bgsrand is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Next month's Plan Commission agenda is up and spotted the affordable housing development planned for the SE corner of Lake & Damen has grown from 10 stories to 12 stories, 136 ft. The other high rise on the agenda is 160 N Elizabeth.

Agenda: https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/dept...n_Hearing.html
Can you find any more info about the Esports arena at S Wabash?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18413  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 3:40 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgsrand View Post
Can you find any more info about the Esports arena at S Wabash?
It was talked about awhile ago in the General Discussions thread. It's supposed to be 106K sq ft with room for 800 people

https://www.chicagotribune.com/colum...tz4-story.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/espo...-idUSFLMbw5G8Z

etc
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18414  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 4:08 PM
Tar Heel Tar Heel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 16
Construction crane is up at 609 w. Randolph. It's glorious.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18415  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2021, 6:59 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
609 W Randolph

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tar Heel View Post
Construction crane is up at 609 w. Randolph. It's glorious.
Feb 25





__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18416  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 8:07 PM
archguy archguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 35
160 N Elizabeth

Thought I'd drop in some renderings for 160 N Elizabeth on the Plan Commission agenda for March. Think they were revealed on YIMBY first. https://chicagoyimby.com/2021/01/ren...west-loop.html

more recently also seen on chicagoarchitecture.org






Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18417  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 8:58 PM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 387
^brutal facade treatment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18418  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 10:24 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
Marquette is planning a 24 story highrise, 280 units, for Damen & Harrison. They then want to build a 9 story midrise, with 120 units, just south of the highrise. These plots are a part of the IMD Planned Development, so they likely won't need a zoning change. Marquette hopes to start construction in July

Source: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/comm...idio-headline4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18419  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2021, 5:34 PM
Tar Heel Tar Heel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 16
Spotted a few Power Construction surveyors at the Onni site (354 Union?) next to to K2 in Fulton Market. Could be a sign this one is starting soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18420  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2021, 5:49 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tar Heel View Post
Spotted a few Power Construction surveyors at the Onni site (354 Union?) next to to K2 in Fulton Market. Could be a sign this one is starting soon.
Thye've had construction permits for like a year lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:22 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.