Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark
Very scary, but this has been happening for some time. I remember hearing 10+ years ago that Vancouver real estate has been nuts.
What is the reason for this? Is it just prime urban areas that have gone beyond the price range of the average buyer or is it everywhere?
|
Here's an article on one of the major factors.
Another factor cited often is that in the 70s (I think) a large amount of developable land in the Vancouver area was reserved for agricultural uses, which basically turned "land near Vancouver" into a much more finite resource and valuable commodity. There isn't really any more land within commuting distance of Vancouver that isn't part of the Agricultural Land Reserve (I think that's the official designation), already built on, or a mountain.
Then yeah, there's also the fact that properties there are much more commodified than they are here - in many ways their primary function is no longer a space for residence or work, but basically stocks to be bought and sold. At least that's the impression I get.
I'd be interested in seeing the differences in housing dynamics between Vancouver and Victoria. I get the impression that Victoria was traditionally more old-money and expensive, but has been facing less housing pressure (with the result that both cities are expensive to buy property in now - but it became expensive much more rapidly in Vancouver). I think Victoria might also have some kind of Agricultural Land Reserve (there are others in other parts of BC, and there is farming around Victoria)