Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayormccheese
I think you’re placing Philadelphia’s rowhomes on a pedestal. Sure some are fine but a lot aren’t.
|
Plenty of rowhomes are bad, this is true, but I think the real benefit is their density and land-use being widespread in Philly - not just any particular rowhome which may or may not be nice. We can rehab and build
a lot of rowhomes in Philadelphia, which can provide relatively affordable homeownership options for the foreseeable future. We can increase our population significantly without expanding our urban footprint in a way that few other America cities can, because their zoning and land-use doesn't really incentivize it. A higher homeownership % than the other cities in the Northeast is one of the better things about Philadelphia IMO, and something that "the rowhome" as a general concept really enables. (For reference, the homeownership rate in Philly 53.0%, while NYC = 32.7%, Boston = 35%, DC = 41.6%, Baltimore = 47.5%). is Not to mention the environmental benefits.