HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1221  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 9:08 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
It is kind of a weird situation. In practical terms I would say that it is clearly worth having the city spend $700,000 or so in order to deal with a site that has been a problem for over 15 years.

I hope the project gets going soon because the site looks absolutely awful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1222  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2010, 5:12 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Allnovascotia is reporting that TAO is moving to the Freemasons' Hall on Barrington from Bayers Lake.

Is anything in the old Junk and Foibles spot?

Barrington has a fair amount of momentum right now. If this continues, maybe it'll be a viable street again. It kind of needs everything to come together at more or less the same time so that there's enough going on to make it a worthwhile destination. Hopefully we'll see work begin on the Sam the Record Man buildings and NFB and more new retail tenants.

Not sure what the Keith Building's status is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1223  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2010, 11:31 AM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
Proposed Barrington Street development starting to take shape

By ROGER TAYLOR Business Columnist
Wed. Apr 28 - 4:53 AM






Restaurateur and developer Chris Tzaneteas is betting Halifax’s historic Barrington Street is about to make a comeback.

He may soon become the new owner of the Tip Top Tailors building at 1592 Barrington St.. He has an accepted offer on the building after an earlier deal to sell to another purchaser fell apart. Tzaneteas told me Tuesday, if everything goes as planned, he should be able to take ownership of the property in June.

Tzaneteas and his business partner, Costa Elles, own Eat It Two Entertainment, which operates a number of restaurants and bars: Opa Greek Taverna, The Argyle Bar and Grill, and Mosaic Social Dining, all on Argyle Street. And opening on May 6, a new bar called G Lounge in the spot once occupied by Seven Wine Bar and Restaurant on Grafton Street.

The G stands for Grafton, he says.

On Tuesday, I wrote about the Tzaneteas and Elles’ plan to build a new apartment building at 1572 Barrington St., formerly known as the St. Mary’s Young Men’s Total Abstinence and Benevolent Society Hall, and more recently, the Halifax home of the National Film Board of Canada, until the building was destroyed by fire in 1991.

However, Tzaneteas says the project is much larger than first thought. Now, $15 million will be spent to create an 88,000-square-foot, 52-unit apartment complex, with 18,000 square feet of retail space on the ground floor.

And it will involve two historic buildings, not just one.

The plan now includes the Farquhar Building at 1558 Barrington St., at the corner with Blowers Street, he says, which is currently known for the Venus Pizza shop.

Both the NFB building and the Farquhar building will be linked by building around the Brander Morris Building at 1566 Barrington St., which is owned by Halifax landlord and developer Louis Reznick, who has expressed concern about his neighbour’s development plans.

While Reznick has complained that Tzaneteas and Elles may have been getting too much of the heritage funding, provided as an incentive for maintaining the historic character of Barrington Street, Tzaneteas says he’s not receiving any more than any other property owner on the street.

"We’re talking about $100,000 maximum for each one (of the buildings), for the restoration of the facade. The rest of the money is in tax credits, which means the taxpayers are not out any money at all. It’s money that the city is not currently collecting."

In total, Tzaneteas says he will receive about $500,000 in grants and tax credits and the forgiving of a $175,000 loan from the city, which dates back to 1991 and was used to pay for steel beams erected to support the facade of the burned-out building.

Tzaneteas says there was always an agreement between the city and the previous owner to forgive that $175,000 when the property redeveloped. So when he and his partner acquired the property about five years ago that agreement came with the deal.

"We’re talking about a development that will be very positive for the downtown. We’re talking about infrastructure that already exists. It’s already policed . . . streets are cleaned, it’s already snowplowed; I could go on and on about the benefits of development in the downtown."

Tzaneteas says the plans for the building have been completed and he has applied for a pre-development permit from the city. If things go as planned, the earliest construction will begin is October.

( rtaylor@herald.ca)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1224  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2010, 11:56 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
This development just keeps getting better and better. $15 million should build quite a significant complex. Having 18,000 square feet of retail is another plus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1225  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2010, 12:18 PM
beyeas beyeas is offline
Fizzix geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South End, Hali
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Allnovascotia is reporting that TAO is moving to the Freemasons' Hall on Barrington from Bayers Lake.

Is anything in the old Junk and Foibles spot?

Barrington has a fair amount of momentum right now. If this continues, maybe it'll be a viable street again. It kind of needs everything to come together at more or less the same time so that there's enough going on to make it a worthwhile destination. Hopefully we'll see work begin on the Sam the Record Man buildings and NFB and more new retail tenants.

Not sure what the Keith Building's status is.
Gotta say, the idea of a business moving FROM Bayers to Barrington makes me smile. And TAO is exactly the sort of small business who I think could do quick well in the downtown/southend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1226  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2010, 6:49 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by beyeas View Post
Gotta say, the idea of a business moving FROM Bayers to Barrington makes me smile. And TAO is exactly the sort of small business who I think could do quick well in the downtown/southend.
That is awesome news! Spring Garden has always remained strong and Quinpool has been iffy, but still holding on okay. Gottingen and Barrington have been on life support or given the perverbial "He's dead Jim" from doctor McCoy (sorry, I met Leonard Nimoy in Vulcan on the weekend, I couldn't help it).

Now all we need to go (after getting the businesses there) is get some more residential density into downtown to promote people to walk around and explore the businesses there and they should do well!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1227  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2010, 8:37 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I wonder if the building on Blowers next to the Farquhar Building will be included in the redevelopment?

The cost breakdown for NFB looks pretty reasonable. It's mostly tax breaks, except for a small amount of money for facade improvements, something that directly benefits the public. I'm not sure failing to recover $175,000 spent in the mid-90s to stabilize the facade counts as "funding" - it seems like this was a bit of a pipe dream back then, and maybe something necessary to get it funded through council. Whether or not it was a good decision is beside the point now.

Barrington was bad back in the 90s but a couple of years ago it was doing relatively well, and it was generally on the upswing since about 2000. I think a lot of the recent fall backward has been somewhat artificial since many of the vacancies are due to redevelopment or buildings changing hands. It's not a depressed street, it's a fairly attractive street but one where people were holding off on investment because of the promise of future funding. There are still people willing to spend a lot of money there, which is a good sign.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1228  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2010, 10:43 AM
kph06's Avatar
kph06 kph06 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,025
Interesting interview from The Coast with Louis Reznick about Barrington Street. Source: The Coast

Coast exclusive: interview with Louis Reznick
Major Barrington Street owner lays out plans for the Roy, Sam the Record Man and Ginger’s Tavern buildings, and discusses his vision for downtown Halifax.
Posted by Carsten Knox on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:16 PM

As Coast special issues editor and Shoptalk reporter Carsten Knox was preparing for this week’s Shoplocal issue, which will concentrate on Barrington Street, he caught up with property baron Louis Reznick, who owns the Roy Building, the Morris Tea building, the former Sam the Record Man and Ginger’s Tavern buildings, and the buildings housing Freak Lunchbox and Attica. Reznick granted Knox this exclusive interview.

Q. What is your vision for Barrington Street?

A. Well, it’s not a vision, really. It’s a belief that the current trend will continue. The current trend is that the retailers of the past will continue to exit. We would hope that they stay, but I think that the downtown, as in most major cities, is undergoing a huge change.

What you see in other cities is more people moving and living downtown. I believe that will happen in Halifax. The reason it hasn’t happened so far is there’s nowhere for them to live. The new planning strategy, the new MPS [Municipal Planning Strategy], calls for residential downtown. The planners had anticipated that happening, you had the Twisted Sisters approved, I think there was one or two around the Keith’s Brewery approved. You had two or three buildings approved for people to start moving downtown, and they probably would have had they been built. You keep on blaming planners and you keep on blaming the city, but it’s really developers are to blame. They’ve knocked down buildings and proposed developments and not gone on to do them. Without people you don’t have the wherewithal to have the new types of businesses, back to the vision. I envision people coming downtown.


Today’s entertainment is going out for dinner, looking at books, looking at magazines, travel agencies, more service types businesses and mercantile, retail type stores. If you’re going to have retail, they’re the type of stores that people want to spend time in. More for home furnishings, maybe lifestyle type store, maybe even car dealerships, Vespa dealerships, bicycle shops, sporting shops, those kinds of things. Shoe stores, clothing stores, I don’t believe…listen, I would love for those stores to come down to Barrington Street, I’d be the first to want to rent them space. I just don’t believe that’s in the cards. If you go shopping for retail items, if you want a pair of shoes, you want to go to a place where they have four or five shoe stores. You’re not going to get that on Barrington Street anymore, the rents are too high.
And that’s another thing, you have stores that are leaving, because their business model doesn’t work on Barrington Street anymore, like a Carsand Mosher. It’s clear. So they leave and they demand a high, high price for their building, as they should... but they leave a store that’s a mess. It’s got a leaky roof, it’s got windows with seals that are broken, they are terrible buildings. The city has gone forward with grants and tax incentives to do this, and yet it’s hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix those stores, plus the cost of the building itself. So you can’t then go ahead and renovate the building and rent it to a store that’s going to sell greeting cards. They’re just not going to make enough money to pay that rent. So, you’re going to have to have more creative-type stores that are able to make a living and pay the rent and attract other people to Barrington Street. A perfect example is Freak Lunchbox: It’s doing well with tourists and the people who work downtown, it’s a destination. People will come down and bring the kids. And then they tried to do the Peepshow Girly Boutique. They’re imaginative, creative entrepreneurs, but they found it difficult to make a go of it. I think they had a good go, I think they were doing rather well, maybe not up to their expectations. But they did do business there. I think the problem is you need other retailers to come downtown to buy a pair of jeans and then go somewhere else to buy a hair band, or who knows what else.

So, I think there’s not a vision so much as a hope that businesses will come downtown. You have offices downtown, there are places that are needed for those working people to use. And when you have residential so you have the same amount of people down there during the day as you do at night, then businesses can survive. Businesses don’t survive on 9-5 anymore. And transportation is great on Barrington Street. If the convention centre comes along, hopefully, you’ve got the Citadel up above and the water down below, [Barrington Street is] centre ice, right? There’s no question it will continue. Is it having a bump in the road? Most certainly. Not because of people like me, not because of individual store owners, it’s just a change. It’s sort of in a midlife crisis, but not of its own accord. It needs a residential base to move forward in this era. Otherwise, the price of gas, the lack of parking, which isn’t special to Halifax, you want people living in Halifax who can walk and ride their bicycles to these stores, which will come once you have people who will shop in them. But you can’t have stores come and hope that people will just show up at their doorstep.

In the meantime there are a lot of people who would like to work downtown. There are a lot of stores that will survive in the present state with the amount of foot traffic on Barrington Street. The cultural side of things, the arts are downtown, the museums are downtown, NSCAD, the waterfront. It’s not like nothing is happening.

It’s not only the residential developers who haven’t put their best foot forward. You’ve got little shopkeepers who are doing their best to keep their store tidy and whatever, but there are some who haven’t done anything to their business in a long, long time. Sitting on their property, which is their right, they run their businesses and watch their real estate appreciate, but they’re not really changing their businesses. There’s a lot of things that in a perfect world could happen quicker. You’ve got the library that’s going to be built in the next few years on Spring Garden. The cultural hub is and always will be downtown. People will come. The problem is we don’t want to rely on tourists, we want people living downtown. By we, I mean everybody: the planners that plan for it, the city needs it.

The city, for all its good intentions, they have landscape and street furniture plans for Barrington, which should have been done. Make the streetscape a little more presentable, maybe some green and benches. There are other things that can be done and are in the cards. Unfortunately they have priorities for the money… they take from the downtown but don’t want to put back. All the tax that comes out of the downtown is enormous, and what is it they put back, a few dollars in grants? Their grant money is really our grant money. We do a renovation and the next thing that happens our taxes go up tremendously, and they get even more taxes than what they give us in grants. That’s a vicious circle for downtown developers and entrepreneurs.

Q. What are your plans for the Roy building? You submitted reconstruction plans for the building that could go either commercial office space or residential, but lately we’ve heard that you’ve decided on a residential building. Also, we’ve had conflicting reports about the present tenants in the building---some say they’re being evicted, but others, new renters, tell us they’ve been promised a year in the Roy building.

A. I wouldn’t say anybody’s been guaranteed to be there a year. I don’t do the rentals, but I doubt very much. I won’t say factually, but I certainly hope it won’t be a year. It will be an office building. We’ll leave the residential on Barrington to Medjuck [editor’s note: Frank Medjuck has applied to rebuild the old Eaton’s department store (present day Discovery Centre) building as a 20-storey apartment building.]

You’ve got to realize, the new plan calls for a maximum height of six storeys. Which won’t allow for a lot of the buildings to be redeveloped to six storeys given the very nature of the buildings. You can look at the one being planned for the NFB space. Even if they do the planned development and even if it works out the way they’re proposing it, that entails Barrington Street and some space over on top of Argyle buildings. I think that calls for 40 or 50 units. That’s a huge piece for Barrington Street. There is nothing where you can get big buildings on Barrington Street. To do a little apartment with four or five suites in it, that’s fine, but that’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about condo buildings, 200-suiters. Like the Keith’s property or the Twisted Sisters. That’s what you need. You need affordable downtown development, not a few apartments here and there on top of a storefront. That’s good but it isn’t going to solve the need. You need good density to support park infrastructure, maybe a couple schools, NSCAD, which would gobble up 100 or 200 lower cost units. Louis Lawen [developer of the Trillium building on Spring Garden Road] doing buildings as far as I understand… he rents them up as soon as they’re built. The desire is there and the need for big residential.

The Roy could be a good spot for residential, the problem being it’s just too expensive. I don’t think the numbers work for residential. The market is there. I would love to do a residential building, if the means were there, if an affordable piece of land was there. And I could do it. I’m not a residential guy, anyway. I’ve done it; it’s just not something I’m into. We like building, owning and managing our properties. With residential, you sell them and you’re done. I’m not a cookie-cutter type of guy. We’re busy with what we’re doing. You’ve got a bunch of good residential developers in town. Hopefully those opportunities will come up. Not to say if a good deal came up I wouldn’t do it!

We have a great plan with The Roy. That building will fit into the conservation district that’s now been legislated into the HRM. We have a great plan looking forward to the office building. Yes, it’s taller that what the new plans call for and that’s why it was grandfathered into the old municipal planning strategy. If it were to be passed we would build it right away. Just think of another 100,000 square feet of office space, bringing more people standing at bus stops during the day. At night, what would go into the base of that tower, there are six floors. It will be a structure that to all appearances would be like The Roy. We’re planning health clubs in there. All these workers downtown, don’t you think they want a gym to go to at night? Or a good yoga place with showers and proper facilities? Places where you can lounge and dine or just dessert, read something or hang around, like an Indigo Books. The gym won’t come without a bookstore, the bookstore won’t come without a coffee shop, but if I have that social structure, which we have called for with some venue space, maybe some galleries in it. There’s your cultural heritage in so far as usage is concerned. Heritage isn’t just a vision of an old building sitting there, heritage is cultural also. How about people just wanting to come stay on Barrington Street? The guy who leaves work at 5 o’clock, is he in a rush to get home? He might stick around for a couple hours if he’s got a place to go. It’s an important and integral part to the puzzle. Just because it’s not going to be residential and just because it’s not going to be an old, broken-down building doesn’t mean it doesn’t fit onto the street. There’s some real historic merit to having certain usages on that street that can’t be there because you don’t have the space for it. The old buildings can’t accommodate the types of buildings that people need today to do the things people need on Barrington and downtown.

Q. What about the Sam the Record Man and Ginger’s Tavern buildings?

A. We have lots of interest. Going back to the Roy, we have great hope that a lot of our tenants will stay with us. We haven’t closed yet [on the Carsand Mosher Building], we’ve contracted to buy it, which has 5,000 square feet of office space there. Sam’s is going to have another 15,000 square feet of office space. First dibs will go to our existing tenants. With Sam’s we are quite confident that as the space is finished it will be filled.

Q. Will tenants’ rent go up?

A. We’ll work it out. Renovations are a moving target. It’s quite, quite expensive. The expected increase for the most part would be common area costs, the cost of maintaining the space, taxes, but having said that, costs that we’re eating on a building like The Roy. You can eat off the floors, the building is immaculate. Outside, the brick is balding, the windows aren’t being replaced. There aren’t two windows that look the same. And it’s not what we’ve done, we bought it in anticipation of renovating it or having to do something major to it. As it turns out, it was too major to do anything, which is why we went for redevelopment. But if you’re looking at paying more, we try and keep within a range. The market can only bear so much. We’re not going to be attracting the Stewart McKelvey law firms into our buildings. So the partnerships we create with our tenants, we know the kinds of rent they can afford and we try to build to accommodate for them. Well try to keep them in line.

Q. What about your other downtown properties?

A. The Morris Tea Building---it’s a heritage building. We’ve been working on it for a year. It’ll be ready this fall. We do have tenants for it. We’ve done 14 projects, unbeknownst to a lot of people. We finished one on Gottingen last year. We just keep motoring along. I think our tenants, for the most part, are happy. We carry a lot on our shoulders for a lot of things that other people are doing. I think we’re doing a really good job, and we’re trying our best, that’s for sure. We encourage everyone to take pride in the street. If we have an opportunity come up and it works, that’s our business. Our business is owning and managing real estate. To do that you have to have tenants, and those tenants we consider our partners. And we’ve got a tremendous bunch of tenants. I can almost call them friends. I can almost walk into buildings and know most of them. And I’m not there, so my staff of course knows them all. And it’s great. We’ve built up a great relationship. I love the creativity, there’s a great undercurrent in Halifax. In the 10 years I’ve been there, more of the college grads are staying. You can definitely feel the youth, and that vibe. I just enjoy it. It’s got a great cultural slant to it, and a warmth. A small town feel, big town assets.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1229  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2010, 6:53 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,004
A very strange article. I don't know if its the editing or Reznick himself. His thoughts are all over the place and seem to not always make sense. And I don't know if he really even answered any of the questions. And then it stated that Louis Lowen was constructing the Trillium. Not true. Very strange indeed. I can see why it wasn't printed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1230  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2010, 8:11 PM
DigitalNinja DigitalNinja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 964
From what I read of the Coast... The majority of their articles are biased, writing style sucks, or the editing sucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1231  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2010, 8:24 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
The Discovery Centre is also not in the old Eaton's building, it's in the old Zeller's building.

I think there are some good points in there about costs and the trade-offs that developers have to evaluate. It does sound a bit scattered but that's normal if you let somebody talk at length after a very open-ended question.

I agree that it's not a very well-written article, and yeah, the quality of writing in The Coast is for the most part pretty poor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1232  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2010, 10:17 PM
terrynorthend terrynorthend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The Discovery Centre is also not in the old Eaton's building, it's in the old Zeller's building.
And I think the proposal is down to 16 stories now, not 20.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1233  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2010, 10:23 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrynorthend View Post
And I think the proposal is down to 16 stories now, not 20.
Yep. As I mentioned in that project thread, I was not so thrilled with it initially but I am looking forward to seeing revised renderings.

Reznick has a good point about how putting a few dozen apartments here or there is not going to help Barrington. The street needs thousands of new residents nearby to turn it into a busy, viable shopping district, something that most people seem to want it to be. It's very true that simply renovating storefronts is not going to do it - you need the local economy to serve and right now it's not there for Barrington Street. Gottingen has the same structural problem which is rapidly being solved, not through window dressing but by bringing in lots of new people and new money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1234  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 6:24 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Yep. As I mentioned in that project thread, I was not so thrilled with it initially but I am looking forward to seeing revised renderings.

Reznick has a good point about how putting a few dozen apartments here or there is not going to help Barrington. The street needs thousands of new residents nearby to turn it into a busy, viable shopping district, something that most people seem to want it to be. It's very true that simply renovating storefronts is not going to do it - you need the local economy to serve and right now it's not there for Barrington Street. Gottingen has the same structural problem which is rapidly being solved, not through window dressing but by bringing in lots of new people and new money.
Hopefully Halifax residents will accept this - that having a vibrant city means allowing higher density in order to justify high land prices downtown. Otherwise major developments will be forced to locate in the suburbs. If you look at Toronto, most of the condos going up in the downtown core are in the 30 - 50 storey range. In Halifax this might translate to 10 - 20 floors (this is purely a subjective view). However, I realize that Barrington Street is worth preserving (hopefully it will be feasible for development at low building height and density). I think that building heights should have been allowed to be higher in other downtown areas - then the additional property tax could have been used to subsidize Barrington Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1235  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 12:45 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
According to the allnovascotia.com, Dalhousie University is planning to build a new $30 -$35 million dollar residence for about 300 students. It should be complete by September 2012 and be on LeMarchant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1236  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 12:47 PM
beyeas beyeas is offline
Fizzix geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South End, Hali
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
According to the allnovascotia.com, Dalhousie University is planning to build a new $30 -$35 million dollar residence for about 300 students. It should be complete by September 2012 and be on LeMarchant.
Hmm... I wonder where on LeMarchant? I can't think of any empty lots, so maybe they are taking down some of the "homes" that they own and had converted to office space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1237  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 1:36 PM
hoser111's Avatar
hoser111 hoser111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 341
I caught the tail end of a news snippet the other night that was talking about Dal and mentioned a $30M price tag that also included a new sports facility to replace Dalplex....perhaps this is part of the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1238  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 1:51 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoser111 View Post
I caught the tail end of a news snippet the other night that was talking about Dal and mentioned a $30M price tag that also included a new sports facility to replace Dalplex....perhaps this is part of the same.
It is described in more detail in this report (http://campusplan.dal.ca/Files/Report_Sept_2009.pdf) on page 24 (of 206 pages). It will be 6 floors of 30,000 square feet per floor with the first 2 floors being offices and student services.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1239  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 2:34 PM
beyeas beyeas is offline
Fizzix geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South End, Hali
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
It is described in more detail in this report (http://campusplan.dal.ca/Files/Report_Sept_2009.pdf) on page 24 (of 206 pages). It will be 6 floors of 30,000 square feet per floor with the first 2 floors being offices and student services.
Ahhh ok.

This is where it is going:
http://www.bing.com/maps/?v=2&cp=rf5...42&lvl=2&sty=b
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1240  
Old Posted May 2, 2010, 3:47 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,802
Anybody have any picture updates or phototours that they can upload??

I'm out of province for the next 6 months and am dying for some updates on the Trillium, NSP, Vic, etc
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:44 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.