Quote:
Originally Posted by Haliguy
Well, you can also make the case that if we don't get climate change under control there may not be any food to service people anyway. The fact people can't out of their car to get food always seemed lazy to me.
|
This discussion seems a little sanctimonious, but getting past that, perhaps the government should just shut down all fast food restaurants, as that stuff isn't healthy for anybody to eat anyhow. Solves the drive-thru problem, and frees-up space for more residential. Maybe there are more things that are wasteful and unnecessary that the government can shut down.
Where should the line be drawn?
And how hard is it to make coffee at home and take it with you (unless you're riding a bicycle, I suppose)?
How about all of the waste caused by rapidly changing technology or fashion? How many devices are tossed because we need to rush out to get the latest greatest (on the day of the iphone 15 launch)? How many clothes are tossed because they are no longer in style? How many appliances end up in the landfill or getting recycled because they now only last 7 - 10 years instead of 20 - 25 as they used to? How many devices go in the garbage because they are made to not be serviceable?
Climate change can and should get you looking at everything 'we' (i.e. the planet's population) do, and TBH, should start with somehow curtailing the massive growth rate of the population itself. The more people on the planet trying to live 'the good life', the further into the climate hole we will fall. It's interesting that nobody seems to get that.