HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2021, 11:50 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Couple more pieces of information: the developer (Tim Ralston) previously developed the Riverscape, on the former Terminal One South, just north of the Fremont Bridge. The architects for the project are GBD.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 2:45 AM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
...I do find it strange that there are so few opportunities to have a meal or drink a glass of wine facing the river.
The river is a tough spot for restaurants or retail.

I used to love going to McCall's back in the late 90s. Remember McCall's Waterfront Cafe, between the Salmon St Springs fountain and the Hawthorn bridge? If I'm not mistaken, that place went through multiple owners, constantly changing because nobody could figure out how to make it work.

At first glance, it would seem like the river is a great spot for a restaurant, but in reality, it's not close enough to businesses or shopping, so unless the weather was amazing and it wasn't a work hour... the place was always dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 8:01 AM
CorbinWarrick CorbinWarrick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2oh1 View Post
The river is a tough spot for restaurants or retail.

I used to love going to McCall's back in the late 90s. Remember McCall's Waterfront Cafe, between the Salmon St Springs fountain and the Hawthorn bridge? If I'm not mistaken, that place went through multiple owners, constantly changing because nobody could figure out how to make it work.

At first glance, it would seem like the river is a great spot for a restaurant, but in reality, it's not close enough to businesses or shopping, so unless the weather was amazing and it wasn't a work hour... the place was always dead.
Look at Vancouver Washington’s new waterfront that’s how you do it. Hopefully the new Riverplace development does this
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 8:27 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbinWarrick View Post
What does our waterfront even offer? It’s so bland. Just concrete and grass. Yea we can have a few events on it in the summer but other than that what does it offer?

Like Macc said you hardly can even find anything there to do like eating and enjoying a glass of wine facing the river. I keep going back to Vancouver Washington because they did it so well.

At this point, it is what it is, all we can do now is hope riverplace new development is a homerun with this type of stuff
A space to walk and relax, especially on a nice day, it's a good place to get out of the urban context of downtown and enjoy the river, the views, and the space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 9:39 AM
CorbinWarrick CorbinWarrick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife View Post
A space to walk and relax, especially on a nice day, it's a good place to get out of the urban context of downtown and enjoy the river, the views, and the space.
I guess but it’s a lazy uncreative space
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 4:16 PM
pdxsg34 pdxsg34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbinWarrick View Post
I guess but it’s a lazy uncreative space
We get it, you've made your points clear
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 7:03 PM
CorbinWarrick CorbinWarrick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxsg34 View Post
We get it, you've made your points clear
It’s all good though we have a chance to hit a home run with the new riverplace development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 10:37 PM
Leo Leo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbinWarrick View Post
What does our waterfront even offer? It’s so bland. Just concrete and grass. Yea we can have a few events on it in the summer but other than that what does it offer?

Like Macc said you hardly can even find anything there to do like eating and enjoying a glass of wine facing the river. I keep going back to Vancouver Washington because they did it so well.

At this point, it is what it is, all we can do now is hope riverplace new development is a homerun with this type of stuff
Like I said, people do use the waterfront park, even when there are no events, and regardless of whether you think it is bland or not. People do like bland things - they paint walls white, go see the ocean, eat rice. Not everything has to be this:


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 7:04 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbinWarrick View Post
I guess but it’s a lazy uncreative space
It's a park. It does what parks do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 7:21 PM
DMH DMH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Portland (part-time); warm foreign countries (part-time)
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbinWarrick View Post
Look at Vancouver Washington’s new waterfront that’s how you do it. Hopefully the new Riverplace development does this
The ambitious proposal to redevelop part of Riverplace does not even reach the Willamette River embankment. The site is west of S. River Drive. The peaceful, labyrinthine South Waterfront Park lies between the proposed redevelopment site and the river. Wining and dining on the riverfront will need to happen elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 9:36 PM
CorbinWarrick CorbinWarrick is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMH View Post
The ambitious proposal to redevelop part of Riverplace does not even reach the Willamette River embankment. The site is west of S. River Drive. The peaceful, labyrinthine South Waterfront Park lies between the proposed redevelopment site and the river. Wining and dining on the riverfront will need to happen elsewhere.
Ahh damn just saw the redevelopment map again yea your right.. But I guess the stairs they want to design look nice
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2022, 9:22 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
Not much left of the old Mills buildings, hopefully they can find a developer to preserve what's left ASAP.

__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2022, 4:21 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 487
Centennial Mills

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2022, 2:30 AM
jb111120 jb111120 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 75
The link says 'see attached drawings.' How do I access those?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2022, 3:04 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
There’s no way to see everything that was submitted other than through a public records request. There will be a Pre-Application Conference notice that will go out in the next few weeks or so though.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2022, 3:33 AM
jb111120 jb111120 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 75
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2022, 11:44 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
On Prosper Portland's agenda this Wednesday:

Quote:
Action Item: Authorizing the Terms of a Disposition and Development Agreement to Convey Approximately 4.4 Acres of Prosper Portland-Owned Property in the River District Tax Increment Finance District

Report 22-34
Resolution 7470
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2022, 4:48 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,517
[$] https://www.oregonlive.com/business/...-property.html

Quote:
Prosper Portland lowers its price in sale of decaying Centennial Mills property
Published: Dec. 13, 2022, 8:00 a.m.
By Kristine de Leon | The Oregonian/OregonLive

Prosper Portland commissioners are set to approve the sale of the 4.4-acre Centennial Mills property in Northwest Portland for $8.25 million — nearly $5 million less than it had initially planned.

Portland’s economic development agency plans to unload the waterfront former flour mill to Oregon-based developer MLR Ventures LLC for a private redevelopment. Prosper Portland previously negotiated a sale price of $13 million, a deal approved by the agency’s commissioners in November 2021. Now, though, it’s asking commissioners to cut the price by $4.75 million.

The agency says that’s in part because the developer has agreed to take on work that Prosper Portland would otherwise have paid for under the original agreement.

The new agreement also puts MLR Ventures responsible for the removal of roughly 750 wharf pilings located on adjacent land that’s currently leased from the Oregon Division of State Lands. Under the previous agreement, Prosper Portland was obligated to do the removal, which was estimated to cost about $1.5 million.

...

Prosper Portland said at this point it knows little of MLR Ventures’ plan for the site. The agency said the developer has indicated the plan could include a 17-story tower. It expects construction would begin within 10 years of closing on the sale.

...

The developer is not required to preserve the historic flour mill on the property, a stipulation that the city had maintained during negotiations with past developers. The developer will have to build a greenway path along the length of the property and meet the city’s inclusionary housing requirements with onsite affordable housing, if MLR Ventures decides to develop housing on the site.

...
(full article)
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2022, 4:49 PM
uncommon.name's Avatar
uncommon.name uncommon.name is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 470
Nevermind - Mark beat me to it lol
__________________
Passion for Landscape and Architectural photography. Check out my flickr

Last edited by uncommon.name; Dec 13, 2022 at 4:50 PM. Reason: Duplicate article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2022, 11:48 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Quote:
Three-building development planned for Centennial Mills as sale looms



Portland economic development officials are preparing to sell the riverfront Centennial Mills property to a developer who plans to turn it into three mixed-use buildings.

Prosper Portland's Board of Commissioners on Wednesday will consider a disposition and development agreement at a discounted purchase price of $8.25 million to MRL Ventures, falling from an earlier expected price of $13 million.

But in terms of the actual revenue to Prosper, the earlier proposal had it slated at around $11.5 million. That would fall to $9.75 million, or about $1.75 million less, under the new terms, agency records show.

Part of the price cut comes down to the private developer taking on work Prosper would have paid for in its earlier agreement, according to the Oregonian, which earlier reported on the Wednesday board proposal. Neither Prosper nor an MLR representative responded to requests from the Business Journal for comment.

The plan is to turn 1362 N.W. Naito Parkway into three mixed-use multifamily residential and retail buildings. Project officials plan to take the entire site through the design review process with one building fully designed, then take the other two buildings through the process separately, according to Dec. 1 records the Business Journal requested from the city.
...continues at the Portland Business Journal ($).
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.