HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #461  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2022, 12:15 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 360, St. Edwards
Posts: 12,383
Texas Facilities Commission Capitol Complex Phase II

Quote:
HOK is designing the second phase of the new Texas Facilities Commission Capitol Complex in downtown Austin. The project is reimagining the Capitol Complex while improving operational efficiencies for state agencies and consolidating leased space.

HOK’s design includes two new state office buildings (a 360,000-sq.-ft., 10-story building and a 165,000-sq.-ft. five-story building) as well as an extension of the pedestrian mall and surface and underground parking for 2,550 vehicles.

The workspace in the new office buildings will be modern, efficient and flexible. Floor-to-ceiling windows will flood the space with daylight, supporting the health and wellness of occupants while embodying the welcoming spirit of Texans.

The buildings will incorporate the latest security and protective measures while prioritizing interaction with the extended pedestrian mall.

As the gateway into the Capitol Complex, the pedestrian mall will include lush landscaping and green space for public gatherings, tourists, community festivals and events.

The design of the buildings and pedestrian mall will complement the neighboring historically significant buildings and civic spaces.

The project will be complete in 2025.


__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #462  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2022, 2:01 AM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,365
I'm glad this phase has no new above-ground parking, but the height is a bit disappointing and 2.5k underground spots seems like serious overkill (unless the state wants to replace its garages on Trinity...) At least the new buildings look quite nice, and more pedestrian space is good news.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #463  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2022, 5:22 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,477
Quote:
Floor-to-ceiling windows will flood the space with daylight, supporting the health and wellness of occupants while embodying the welcoming spirit of Texans.
God there is nothing more annoying than architect BS speak lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #464  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2022, 7:00 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
God there is nothing more annoying than architect BS speak lol.
The only thing working for them in this is that since they're building for the State, they didn't include anything about keeping Austin weird.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #465  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2022, 9:56 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Almost every state employee I know here in Austin (admittedly I only know a few) is WFH almost every work day. I wonder whether the state really needs all the new square footage that is about to come on line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #466  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2022, 10:11 PM
Atom_Mirny Atom_Mirny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 35
My wife has had 3 different state jobs since 2020. Of those groups today; one is 100% WFH, one goes in to the office once a week and the last goes in twice a week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #467  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2022, 4:54 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
Almost every state employee I know here in Austin (admittedly I only know a few) is WFH almost every work day. I wonder whether the state really needs all the new square footage that is about to come on line.
Upgraded modern space that consolidates in-person services and accommodates co-working space and work-from-home infrastructure so that they can, for instance, take offline some of the crappy architecture both in the CC and throughout the city and multiple of their parking garages is a big plus. I hope the state continues with the current master plan.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #468  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2022, 8:34 PM
Maximusx1's Avatar
Maximusx1 Maximusx1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
Been awhile since I was in Kindergarten, but I do not count 10 stories on this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #469  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2022, 11:28 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Upgraded modern space that consolidates in-person services and accommodates co-working space and work-from-home infrastructure so that they can, for instance, take offline some of the crappy architecture both in the CC and throughout the city and multiple of their parking garages is a big plus. I hope the state continues with the current master plan.
Part of the vision for these new buildings was that they should replace leased office space around the city, but, as for the rest, I'm not so sure that's exactly what the state planners had in mind. They expected these buildings (and the massive new garage space) to be fully occupied with state workers. I don't have a horse in this race. I am simply pointing out that because of WFH, even with office consolidation, there will soon be an oversupply of state offices in Austin, one that will likely mirror the oversupply in the pipeline for commercial office space in the city.

Last edited by austlar1; Nov 11, 2022 at 12:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #470  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2022, 1:08 AM
Atom_Mirny Atom_Mirny is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 35
The state is being more generous with WFH as a way to compete with private sector employers. Most people who work with my wife work there because of the WFH policy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #471  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2022, 7:47 PM
myBrain myBrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 691
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #472  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 5:36 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
I'm blown away by how well this turned out. We have a state mall now; a place to peaceably assemble. I'm impressed.


courtesy of ecafsub on reddit
__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #473  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 7:00 AM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,208
Minor FYI.... 16th-17th street is still closed off. 17- MLK is open.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #474  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 1:52 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,194
Is it just my OCD, or does the mall slant in relation to the capitol?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #475  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 2:07 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by IluvATX View Post
Is it just my OCD, or does the mall slant in relation to the capitol?
The whole city slants in relation to the capitol. It sits on top of a hill. Think how much MLK slopes from Lavaca to Trinity. The only way it could have been perfectly level would be to eliminate all cross streets and have stairs either side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #476  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 2:36 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
The whole city slants in relation to the capitol. It sits on top of a hill. Think how much MLK slopes from Lavaca to Trinity. The only way it could have been perfectly level would be to eliminate all cross streets and have stairs either side.
I think I would’ve preferred that scenario.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #477  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 7:43 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Something something joke about Austin leaning left.
__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #478  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 9:16 PM
valhalla valhalla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by IluvATX View Post
I think I would’ve preferred that scenario.
whats weird is they dug everything up when building the underground parking garage so they intentionally put the slant back lol. A level mall with a slight retaining wall on one side or the other would have made more sense
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #479  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 10:03 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by valhalla View Post
whats weird is they dug everything up when building the underground parking garage so they intentionally put the slant back lol. A level mall with a slight retaining wall on one side or the other would have made more sense
I think the guiding principle here was to keep ground level entry for all buildings as best as possible. Although there would be a certain visual appeal of a perfect vantage, that would be undercut by the buildings on one side of this vantage being cut off from the sidewalks adjacent to the green by a retaining wall, and it would thus not be symmetrical either because of differing sidewalk geometries on either side.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #480  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2022, 11:13 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syndic View Post
I'm blown away by how well this turned out. We have a state mall now; a place to peaceably assemble. I'm impressed.


courtesy of ecafsub on reddit
What this view needs is a wall of skyscrapers with colorful lights behind the capitol.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:20 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.