HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburbs


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 11:18 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2020, 1:59 AM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,613
Is it the norm for LPAT proceedings to move along that briskly?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2020, 2:10 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Is it the norm for LPAT proceedings to move along that briskly?
They appealed in October 2019 because Council did not make a decision within the prescribed timeline. The second CMC is in August - still early in the process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2020, 6:05 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown View Post
You're right, this stretch of Innes is destined to be Merivale part deux.

However, the only multi-unit building in the area is the retirement residence next door, and now you want to build a Campeau/William's Court-style multi-building Kanata complex..in Orleans?

Woah woah woah, lets pump the brakes here. We didn't build these curly cue-suburban traffic jams for large buildings! Who will make all the easy money building suburban-sprawl dwellings if Lepine sucks all the air out of the room building these towers?
Merivale is surrounded by mid rise apartment buildings and they are still building them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 10:53 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 633
LPAT Ruling: "The Tribunal Orders the appeal is dismissed"

https://lauradudas.ca/lepine-decision-january-8-2021/

I'm ambivalent to this, hopefully Lepine doesn't give up on the site.

As for this getting rejected, something tells me if this was the OMB rules instead of LPAT it would not have been.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2022, 7:41 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,338
270 Lamarche Ave | up to 25m | 6\7\7f | Proposed

Lepine has submitted a Site Plan Control application to construct three mid-rise apartment buildings ranging from 4 to 7 storeys in height and containing 283 dwelling units, ground-floor accessory retail space in one building, and a two-level underground garage and surface parking area to accommodate 386 spaces at 270 Lamarche Avenue.

The development is fully integrated featuring a two-level underground parking garage containing 354 spaces common to all three buildings and a centrally located surface visitor parking area accommodating 32 spaces accessible from the local street. The apartment building fronting Lamarche Avenue (Building/Pavilion C) is to contain approximately 280 square metres of accessory commercial and retail space on the ground floor. All service functions are to be from the local street. The development plan features a landscape buffer strip along the site’s southern and western yards ranging from 9.0 to 20.0 metres in width that separates the three buildings from the abutting low-rise residential properties. The form of the proposed buildings is multi-tiered from five to seven storeys beyond the noted yards to provide a transition in building mass from the neighbouring low-rise residential character.

Architect: NEUF Architects


Development application:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applica...1-0232/details


Location:




Siteplan:






Renderings:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2022, 9:39 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,662
This 'Lepinechitecture' is getting out of control. Look at those balconies! A little slice of New Orleans on Innes Road? I'm surprised NEUF would be into something that ornate.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2022, 3:23 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Wasn't there a Lepine proposal here that was rejected a year or so ago?

EDIT: this guy:

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=239718

rocketphish, could you merge them? Thank you!

EDIT 2: same overall development, but two different proposals. Don't know if merging is warranted or not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2022, 4:18 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Wasn't there a Lepine proposal here that was rejected a year or so ago?

EDIT: this guy:

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=239718

rocketphish, could you merge them? Thank you!

EDIT 2: same overall development, but two different proposals. Don't know if merging is warranted or not.
Good idea. Done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2022, 4:25 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Good idea. Done.
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2022, 6:13 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,364
I'm beginning to think we should give up on the Cumberland Transitway concept and plan for an elevated rail line along Innes instead. This would accelerate redevelopment of those big box power centres with their massive parking lots into dense TOD.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2022, 1:31 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitchissippi View Post
I'm beginning to think we should give up on the Cumberland Transitway concept and plan for an elevated rail line along Innes instead. This would accelerate redevelopment of those big box power centres with their massive parking lots into dense TOD.
Wondering the same as well. Much of the future Cumberland Transitway corridor has already been developed into low density sfh and townhomes. Innes has the potential to be an urban tree lined boulevard, with bike lanes wide sidewalks and mid-rises with ground floor retail... in 50+ years...
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburbs
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.