HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2061  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2023, 1:40 AM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,563
Fascinating article about a high tech greenhouse built in Dauphin.

https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bu...or-all-seasons


"Growing for all seasons"

New 10-acre greenhouse in Dauphin set produce tomatoes year-round By:

Gabrielle Piché Posted: 6:09 PM CDT Friday, Jul. 28, 2023


Fresh Manitoba-grown tomatoes in local stores — in February — might soon be a possibility.

Sure, the seedlings are from British Columbia. And much of the roughly $40-million greenhouse’s equipment comes from Europe, largely the Netherlands.

The tomatoes, however — the roughly 10 million pounds of tomatoes expected to climb vines in a state-of-the-art greenhouse every 47 weeks — are a product of Dauphin.

“It’s been a long haul, and we’re so looking forward to those plants coming in, and for our first shipment of tomatoes heading out the door,” said Maria Deschauer, managing director of Vermillion Growers.

The site’s ground-breaking ceremony happened in 2019. Nearly four years later, on Thursday, the crew celebrated the grand opening of their first-of-its-kind greenhouse in Manitoba.

As of Tuesday, Vermillion Growers had just a few test pots in its 10-acre greenhouse. The first tomato seedlings are scheduled to arrive Sept. 4 (already approximately one foot tall each). Deschauer expects the first round of tomatoes to be shipped out in November.

Lucky and Maria Deschauer, a brother and sister duo, are two of three co-founders of Vermillion Growers.

During each 10-week maturing phase, the tomatoes will be handled by Dauphin locals — largely Ukrainian immigrants — and high-tech automation that recycles water for irrigation and redistributes carbon dioxide.

“‘Why Dauphin?’… is the question we’re always asked as a team,” said Cormac Foster, Vermillion Growers’ product engineer. “It’s a great, centralized location.”

Vermillion Growers has a goal of transporting tomatoes from vine to store within 24 hours. All of its tomatoes are pre-bought by Red Sun Farms, a greenhouse vegetables company that will distribute Vermillion Growers’ products to stores, Deschauer said.

The tomatoes will go to grocery chains in Winnipeg, Thunder Bay, Regina, Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton, those who worked on Vermillion Growers outlined.

“The need is quite huge in Canada,” Deschauer said. “(There’s) no concern about distributing it.”

Last year, Canada imported $425.9 million worth of tomatoes, or 197,895,929 kilograms, Statistics Canada spokeswoman Melissa Gammage wrote in an email.

“We just wanted to bring year-round production of vegetables to Manitoba,” Deschauer stated.

As of Tuesday, Vermillion Growers had just a few test pots in its 10-acre greenhouse.

She and her brother Lucky moved to Dauphin more than a decade ago. They built multi-unit homes in the city, making themselves familiar to locals.

Lucky’s background is in building. He’d never erected a commercial greenhouse before, but his fascination with the sites formed in childhood, his sister said. She recalled him building a greenhouse in their Altona backyard from scrap windows he’d scavenged from an elementary school.

Deschauer is versed in property development and management.

The siblings embarked on building a greenhouse in Dauphin — also called the City of Sunshine, which bodes well for such a venture — with local property developer Mark Kohan, who’s now Vermillion Growers’ chief financial officer. They began greenhouse research more than five years ago.

“The research was huge,” Deschauer said. “Most of us didn’t quite have a vision for what this kind of greenhouse facility… looked like.”

First, the crew visited a greenhouse in Otterburne. Then, Ontario, and then the Netherlands.

Kohan called the Netherlands “the birthplace of greenhouses.”

“The research was huge. Most of us didn’t quite have a vision for what this kind of greenhouse facility… looked like.” – Maria Deschauer

The trio spent years researching. They hired a European consultant to conduct a feasibility study, they said. Meantime, they were self-funding.

The feasibility study gave them the confidence to continue.

The next step: raise money through private investment. Local investors, including from Dauphin, “jumped on board” using the province’s small business venture capital tax credit, which refunds investors up to 45 per cent of their investment via a tax credit, Deschauer said.

Vermillion Growers raised about $3.5 million through the tax credit program. About 50 per cent of the project’s funding comes through bank financing, while the latter half is from founder and private investment, Deschauer said.

In 2020, the provincial government announced a tax rebate of up to $4.2 million for the project.

The tomato greenhouse is Phase 1. It consumes roughly 12 acres: 10.8 acres of greenhouse and just over an acre for water treatment and packing.

“Our vision is to go from 10 acres of growing space to 70 acres, all under glass,” Deschauer said.

Patrick Jolicoeur, with Morgan, said Vermillion Growers envisions a second greenhouse on 40 acres south of the first facility.

They have the space, surrounding the new build.

Vermillion Growers hired Gakon Netafim, a Netherlands-based greenhouse manufacturing giant, to supply the tomato greenhouse’s technology; irrigation technology company Stolze was also employed. Local business Level Industries, formerly called The Greenhouse Co., built the site.

Level Industries president Patrick Jolicoeur called the European companies “leading innovators in the greenhouse industry.”

Dauphin’s tomato greenhouse is built to collect rainwater, snowmelt and internal condensation for irrigation use. Such water is directed to an on-site treatment plant before being used on crops.

Water not used by plants during watering time will be recycled for future use. Reused water should save 50 per cent of the greenhouse’s water use, said Ricky Elz, a project manager with Gakon Netafim.

The greenhouse’s temperature will hover between 18 C to 25 C during growing time. The facility is designed to distribute carbon dioxide; its glass and screens will be used for insulation and trapping sun energy.

“There’s more sun hours in Dauphin than many places, which lowers the amount of artificial light we need to grow the produce,” Kohan said.

Dauphin Mayor David Bosiak called the greenhouse “awe-inspiring.”

“My gut says ‘Finally, (it’s opening), because it’s been such a long process for them,” Bosiak said.

The facility is designed to distribute carbon dioxide; its glass and screens will be used for insulation and trapping sun energy.

He wasn’t on council when the project was first greenlit. Still, he saw the greenhouse’s delays in real-time: supply chain backlogs held up parts, prices fluctuated and rose. Some equipment was meant to come from Russia; once it invaded Ukraine, “we were scrambling, looking for another source,” Deschauer said.

Dauphin residents’ reactions to the proposed greenhouse oscillated between optimism and skepticism, Mayor Bosiak noted.

The community had heard major projects were coming before — a beef-producing facility, a hemp factory — but they never came to fruition.

“Once the glass started to go up, and people in the community saw the size and the scope of this facility, I think the level of excitement rose dramatically,” Bosiak said.

He hopes Vermillion Growers will have a “trickle-down” effect. Dauphin is ready for new businesses, he said.

However, the city may have to involve Manitoba Hydro if the next phase of Vermillion Growers begins, to ensure there’s enough resources.

“There is a big demand in North America for fresh produced (goods)… locally, just to keep sustainability.”
–Ricky Elz

Vermillion Growers envisions a second greenhouse on 40 acres south of the first facility, said Jolicoeur.

Peppers and cucumbers will likely come from the second site.

“There is a big demand in North America for fresh produced (goods)… locally, just to keep sustainability,” said Elz from Gakon Netafim.

North America is the European company’s largest market, he added. Gakon Netafim equips many Ontario greenhouses. It’s recently gotten interest from Quebec, Alberta, British Columbia and Dauphin.

Elz believes more greenhouses like Vermillion Growers are in Canada’s future. The pandemic intensified demand, he added.

Vermillion Growers will employ roughly 30 people. Dauphin’s Co-op will be a recipient of the locally grown tomatoes, Deschauer said.

gabrielle.piche@winnipegfreepress.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2062  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2023, 12:23 AM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,626
CBC mentioned that the PCs promised “$6.7 million for a feasibility study for new rail line or pipeline to Hudson Bay.” I assume this is for the Port Nelson proposal.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...urry-1.6927018
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2063  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2023, 2:51 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,626
Finally, Bart Kives does a deep dive into the Port Nelson story. Sounds like the hydrology of the Nelson River will be a big impediment to the development of the port. Also, there will be pretty strong opposition from backers of Churchill and environmentalists. I think the project will face a steep uphill battle.

Manitoba considers building 2nd port on Hudson Bay, sidelining Port of Churchill

NeeStaNan project would allow potash, petroleum products from across Prairies to be shipped through Arctic

Bartley Kives · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2023 7:24 PM CDT | Last Updated: August 4

Manitoba is exploring the idea of building a second deepwater port on Hudson Bay as part of a plan to ship potash from Saskatchewan and petroleum products from Alberta through the Arctic Ocean.

The NeeStaNan project, which could also involve a rail line or pipeline to carry bitumen or natural gas, would relegate the existing deepwater facility at the Port of Churchill to a regional supply hub, Manitoba Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Doyle Piwniuk said Friday in an interview.

[...]

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...-bay-1.6928302
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2064  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2023, 2:54 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
What has changed since the first go at establishing Port Nelson? Why is Churchill suddenly inadequate? Are we just repeating history here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2065  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2023, 4:32 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,626
^all good questions. The backers of the proposed NeeStaNan route (who are mainly from Alberta and Sask) believe that flows on the Nelson are better regulated by Hydro, hence the port will be easier to building this time around. However, the Hydrologist quoted in the article thinks MB Hydro actually made matters worse on the Nelson by diverting flows from the Churchill River into the Nelson, increasing silt and destabilizing the banks.

The argument seems to be: Churchill is inadequate for the dimensions of modern cargo ships -- it's too small. The location of the Churchill port up the Churchill river means ice conditions are worse at the existing port than in the open waters of Hudson Bay. The Port Nelson location right at the mouth of the bay, not upriver, would be better able to operate in ice conditions year round.

I think there is also some blind faith that new technologies will succeed this time around, where the old methods from a century ago failed.

Weird that Tom Jackson is some kind of "strategic advisor" to this group.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2066  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2023, 7:00 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
the gold mine trying to open in lynn lake updated their feasibility study
https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/...on-upside.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2067  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2023, 9:14 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Developers announce $20-M hotel project for Flin Flon

Quote:
JP Shearer, a Tim Hortons franchisee in Winnipeg, along with some partners, plan to build a Ramada by Wyndham hotel and conference centre on the site of the old Flin Flon hotel.

That hotel, across the street from city hall, has been vacant for many years and was scheduled to have a meeting with the wrecking ball this past spring.

Developers are planning to renovate the structure and add a new building onto the back.

“We believe the bones of the building make for a great platform for us to create (a new building),” Shearer said. “People are excited about the news.”

Although there are no renderings yet available as to how the new structure might look, the $20-million development is to include a conference centre, fitness room, pool, restaurant and lounge.
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bu...-for-flin-flon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2068  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2023, 10:19 PM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,760
Local quarry operators are donating 1.175 million to restore Stonewall's kilns.

https://stonewallteulontribune.ca/sp...t.aspx#page=12

It will cost $6 million to fully restore them. I think it's so expensive because they are completely dismantling the kilns to their base and reconstructing them. It's not just a quick patch. You can see in the picture of the article I posted that one of the kilns has been completely torn down, more or less, in the background.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2069  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2023, 7:19 PM
anthonyk anthonyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: SE Manitoba
Posts: 248
Anyone here have some extra cash? Major opportunity here.

https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/2...reet-steinbach

Edit to add: Lot is empty, previous building burned down last year
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2070  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 1:38 PM
3de14eec6a 3de14eec6a is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyk View Post
Anyone here have some extra cash? Major opportunity here.

https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/2...reet-steinbach

Edit to add: Lot is empty, previous building burned down last year
Right next to the feed elevator. The most urban of city fixtures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2071  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2023, 4:30 PM
anthonyk anthonyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: SE Manitoba
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3de14eec6a View Post
Right next to the feed elevator. The most urban of city fixtures.
I was hoping nobody would notice

But in all seriousness, I want to see that elevator gone, it's noisy and stinks up the surrounding block. Love the smell of feed in the morning.

Though I do not think it is closing down anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2072  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 3:00 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
ooo
lots hard work but finaly

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2073  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2023, 2:42 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
Manitoba Hydro dams caused decades of harm to Mathias Colomb Cree Nation (pukatawagan), lawsuit alleges
Damages inflicted by 2 Laurie River hydro dams 'happen every day,' lawyer alleges

Ozten Shebahkeget · CBC News · Posted: Dec 06, 2023 7:53 PM CST | Last Updated: December 6

A northern Manitoba First Nation is suing the province and Manitoba Hydro over two dams it says have been damaging their lands and violating their treaty rights for more than 50 years.

Mathias Colomb Cree Nation says the two Laurie River dams, which have been owned and operated by the province since 1970, have taken away its ability to use, enjoy or exercise treaty rights on its traditional and reserve lands as well as unoccupied Crown lands that it is entitled to.

The First Nation wants the revenues that the province and Hydro earned from the two dams, as well as $100 million in general damages and $10 million in punitive and aggravated damages, according to the statement of claim filed at the Manitoba Court of King's Bench on Nov. 29.

The province and Hydro have been wrongly enriched from the profits of the two dams without honouring their Crown obligations to Mathias Colomb and the First Nation's treaty rights, the suit claims.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...ydro-1.7051455
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2074  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2023, 7:07 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
Manitoba Hydro dams caused decades of harm to Mathias Colomb Cree Nation (pukatawagan), lawsuit alleges
Damages inflicted by 2 Laurie River hydro dams 'happen every day,' lawyer alleges

Ozten Shebahkeget · CBC News · Posted: Dec 06, 2023 7:53 PM CST | Last Updated: December 6

A northern Manitoba First Nation is suing the province and Manitoba Hydro over two dams it says have been damaging their lands and violating their treaty rights for more than 50 years.

Mathias Colomb Cree Nation says the two Laurie River dams, which have been owned and operated by the province since 1970, have taken away its ability to use, enjoy or exercise treaty rights on its traditional and reserve lands as well as unoccupied Crown lands that it is entitled to.

The First Nation wants the revenues that the province and Hydro earned from the two dams, as well as $100 million in general damages and $10 million in punitive and aggravated damages, according to the statement of claim filed at the Manitoba Court of King's Bench on Nov. 29.

The province and Hydro have been wrongly enriched from the profits of the two dams without honouring their Crown obligations to Mathias Colomb and the First Nation's treaty rights, the suit claims.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...ydro-1.7051455
Jesus Christ. All revenues from the two dams AND $110M? You know a judge is going to say yes to this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2075  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2023, 7:44 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,791
I've been there. Those dams are ancient technology and so tiny in electrical gen capacity (5 mW each IIRC). They're originally form the mine out there and hydro took them over. I'm sure AJ knows more about them.

Edit I should just read the article:
Manitoba Hydro's website says the two Laurie River dams went up and running in 1952 and 1958, respectively, to support the Sherritt Gordon mining operations near Lynn Lake — a town that was developed by the mining company 60 kilometres south of the stations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2076  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2023, 1:00 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
sherritt did a trade in 70 for more capacity to feed fox and got free power for the farly mine

ive actualy read the agreement few years back it expired in 2000 realy interest


the whole town is quite facinating was financed by the us gov
reading my tittle for my house has signiture of the president at the time

back when sherritt owned it my grandfather flew the line weekly inspecting it rare anyone does that anymore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2077  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2023, 1:08 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Jesus Christ. All revenues from the two dams AND $110M? You know a judge is going to say yes to this.
south indian got nowhere with theirs

puks grasping at straws with the alamos project

bunch of money being spemt on those damns finaly this year as well
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2078  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2024, 7:15 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,791
February 16, 2024
MANITOBA GOVERNMENT ANNOUNCES VIVIAN SAND PROPOSAL WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD

– – –
Serious Environmental Concerns Outweigh Uncertain Economic Benefit: Kinew

The Manitoba government has decided to not issue an environmental licence for the Vivian sand extraction project in the Rural Municipality of Springfield, Premier Wab Kinew and Environment and Climate Change Minister Tracy Schmidt announced today.

“Our government will always put the health and safety of Manitobans first, and this includes ensuring communities have safe, clean drinking water,” said Kinew. “After taking the time and doing our due diligence, our government has come to the decision that the risks of this proposal outweigh any potential benefits.”

The decision made by Schmidt was based on the information and data provided by experts including the report done by the Clean Environment Commission (CEC) as well as consultation with impacted communities and First Nations, noted Kinew. The CEC report identified a number of serious environmental concerns about this project, which would have extracted sand through aquifers that provide drinking water to 100,000 Manitobans, said the premier.

“We have a responsibility to ensure we are not endangering Manitobans’ drinking water,” said Schmidt. “This proposal failed to adequately consider long-term impacts including potential aquifer collapse. That’s why we made the decision to not issue a license for the Vivian sand extraction project.”

The CEC also heard from hundreds of Manitobans voicing their opposition to this project including the community of Springfield, local leaders, scientists and environmental advocacy groups, noted the minister.

https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/?archive=&item=62000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2079  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2024, 7:17 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
February 16, 2024
MANITOBA GOVERNMENT ANNOUNCES VIVIAN SAND PROPOSAL WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD

– – –
Serious Environmental Concerns Outweigh Uncertain Economic Benefit: Kinew

The Manitoba government has decided to not issue an environmental licence for the Vivian sand extraction project in the Rural Municipality of Springfield, Premier Wab Kinew and Environment and Climate Change Minister Tracy Schmidt announced today.

“Our government will always put the health and safety of Manitobans first, and this includes ensuring communities have safe, clean drinking water,” said Kinew. “After taking the time and doing our due diligence, our government has come to the decision that the risks of this proposal outweigh any potential benefits.”

The decision made by Schmidt was based on the information and data provided by experts including the report done by the Clean Environment Commission (CEC) as well as consultation with impacted communities and First Nations, noted Kinew. The CEC report identified a number of serious environmental concerns about this project, which would have extracted sand through aquifers that provide drinking water to 100,000 Manitobans, said the premier.

“We have a responsibility to ensure we are not endangering Manitobans’ drinking water,” said Schmidt. “This proposal failed to adequately consider long-term impacts including potential aquifer collapse. That’s why we made the decision to not issue a license for the Vivian sand extraction project.”

The CEC also heard from hundreds of Manitobans voicing their opposition to this project including the community of Springfield, local leaders, scientists and environmental advocacy groups, noted the minister.

https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/?archive=&item=62000
Good. It wasn't worth the risk of destroying the water supply for SE MB and the Northern USA over lining the pockets of some Albertans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2080  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2024, 7:34 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Good. It wasn't worth the risk of destroying the water supply for SE MB and the Northern USA over lining the pockets of some Albertans.
I've been thinking about the history of this proposed project. I remember it was first announced with big, big, BIG potential for the province, and I was quite enthused with the idea. Money's going to flow in to our coffers, no more "Mr. Have-Not", etc. etc. etc. It almost seemed too good to be true; finally Manitoba had a resource that would make it rich, end there's lots of it. Then it was reported that there were concerns about water quality for, maybe, a few hundred people. Complainers who couldn't see the "big picture" I thought. Then the company started to throw around some threats about the consequences if the project wasn't green lighted. Weird. Why play hardball if the proposal was so good? THEN the election, and the attempt by the outgoing government to sneak in the approval while in caretaker mode. The more I heard about the project, the fishier it smelled. Now that it hasn't been approved, I feel we dodged a bullet. FactaNV made a good point. the profits most likely would have ended up in the pockets of the Alberta company running the operation, and any mess left behind would have been ours.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.