HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > General Photography


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 2:19 PM
ItsConanOBrien ItsConanOBrien is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 2,972
Nikon D50 with 18-55 and 70-300. Hoping to get a 50 f/1.8 soon!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 4:04 PM
Robert Pence's Avatar
Robert Pence Robert Pence is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 4,309
Here are a couple. I have a bunch that I don't use much, or at all, any more. I haven't shot much medium format (120 roll film) recently, as the local custom lab that used to do first-rate E-6 processing went out of business and I'd have to send it to Chicago.

Mamiya 7 - 6x7cm - the only lens I can afford is the 65mm that came with it, which is just about right for most urban photography. I bought the camera used:


Cleveland Center Street Swing Bridge, Detroit-Superior High-Level Viaduct in background. Shot 2003 w/Mamiya 7 on Fuji Provia 100F film:


Rolleiflexes, both strictly manual with no built-in metering or gadgets. The one on the left is a f/3.5 built in 1951, that my aunt gave me. It was the first pro-quality camera that I used, when she loaned it to me in 1962 when I was at Indiana University.

The one on the right is a f/2.8 built in 1955 that I bought lightly-used in 1967 for $270. It's one of the few utilitarian things I can think of that has increased in value.



Cleveland Terminal Tower entrance, 1978, shot with Rolleiflex f/3.5, probably on Kodacolor 100 film:


My favorite medium-format color transparency film is Fuji Provia 100F. Fine grain, strong but not-excessive contrast, saturated colors, and sharp as a tack. It scans beautifully. For color negative film, it's Fuji Reala 100. Excellent dynamic range, pleasing colors, fine grain, scans just as beautifully.
__________________
Getting thrown out of railroad stations since 1979!

Better than ever and always growing: [url=http://www.robertpence.com][b]My Photography Web Site[/b][/url]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 4:30 PM
Kingofthehill's Avatar
Kingofthehill Kingofthehill is offline
International
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,052
Canon 40D

17-40mm f/4L
85mm f/1.8
70-200mm f/4L

I'm looking into selling my 70-200mm and 17-40mm and getting a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS or 16-35mm f/2.8L II.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 9:28 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
An HP Photosmart 318, 2.3 mega pixels. It got it as a gift from a woman in Minnesota.

I had a 1.3 mega pixel Samsung Digimax S101 but I dropped it in January 2007 and it doesn't work anymore because the battery case is broken.

My grandfather and a few of my Flickr contacts use Pentax, so I think I'll be going with that when I get a better (ie. real) camera.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 10:23 PM
initiald's Avatar
initiald initiald is offline
Oak City
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 4,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsConanOBrien View Post
Nikon D50 with 18-55 and 70-300. Hoping to get a 50 f/1.8 soon!
Will the 50mm autofocus with the D50 and D60? I have to manually focus it with the D40.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 4:31 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
An HP Photosmart 318, 2.3 mega pixels. It got it as a gift from a woman in Minnesota.

I had a 1.3 mega pixel Samsung Digimax S101 but I dropped it in January 2007 and it doesn't work anymore because the battery case is broken.

My grandfather and a few of my Flickr contacts use Pentax, so I think I'll be going with that when I get a better (ie. real) camera.
keep ur fingers cross my friend
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 4:33 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob_1412 View Post
Rolleiflexes, both strictly manual with no built-in metering or gadgets. The one on the left is a f/3.5 built in 1951, that my aunt gave me. It was the first pro-quality camera that I used, when she loaned it to me in 1962 when I was at Indiana University.

The one on the right is a f/2.8 built in 1955 that I bought lightly-used in 1967 for $270. It's one of the few utilitarian things I can think of that has increased in value.

aww nice rolleis

mines only a 3.5

u got the lens covers and case still?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 12:35 PM
Robert Pence's Avatar
Robert Pence Robert Pence is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 4,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
aww nice rolleis

mines only a 3.5

u got the lens covers and case still?
Yep! I have the leather cases and original lens covers for both cameras, and accessories for the 3.5 -- close-up lenses and a bunch of filters including the rotating polarizer, although the glass has come de-laminated in it. The filters and close-up lenses all fit in a couple of nice little leather cases with compartments in them.

There's a depth-of-field preview gadget, too. You mount it like a filter on the viewfinder lens, and it has an aperture that you can set to match the one on the taking lens so that you can check out the depth of field in the viewfinder. I have the original leather strap for the 3.5, but it's so old and weak that I don't use it.

Here's a photo my aunt took in Chicago Union Station in the early 1950s when the 3.5 was new:
__________________
Getting thrown out of railroad stations since 1979!

Better than ever and always growing: [url=http://www.robertpence.com][b]My Photography Web Site[/b][/url]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2009, 2:15 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Anyone here own an ol' Film SLR and use it regularily?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2009, 3:45 AM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Penticton
Posts: 3,757
I have a circa 1969 Asahi Pentax Spotmatic and selection of 6 lenses that I inherited from my dad. Still works fine, but I don't use it much as it was sitting in a box for at least 20 years and the body needs a serious cleaning before it will take any shots that _don't_ look like they were taken through a dirty windshield. I'll take it in to a shop some day...

Other cameras I have are a Nikon Coolpic and a Nikon D40 with 18-55mm and 55-200mm lenses.
__________________
Support the mob or mysteriously disappear...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2009, 1:19 PM
MayDay's Avatar
MayDay MayDay is offline
Member of SSP since 1997
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 7,117


Just two lenses for now, the Canon EF-S 55-250mm and Sigma 18-50mm but I'm pretty happy with them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2009, 6:33 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,153
Sony DSCH-3 or something like that


I have Nikon Film SLR but i never use it anymore - still have some film that needs developing
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted May 21, 2009, 5:37 AM
dktshb's Avatar
dktshb dktshb is offline
Environmental Sabotage
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco/ Los Angeles/ Tahoe
Posts: 5,054
Another Canon Rebel XSi here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2009, 7:32 AM
mSeattle's Avatar
mSeattle mSeattle is offline
Socialism 4 Extreme Rich?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: here
Posts: 10,073
My Olympus E-500 is sick (broken prongs in the card slot).
Hope to get a replacement SLR soon.

Currently using Samsung S1050 and Canon sx10 is
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2009, 9:36 AM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by edmontonenthusiast View Post
Anyone here own an ol' Film SLR and use it regularily?
Not regularly anymore. I do have a circa 1988 Minolta X700. I really did like that camera. It served me well. There's some evidence of its use in here.

I also use a Canon SD1100 IS when I'm lazy and want to travel light. Evidence of its use is here and here.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2009, 1:45 PM
MJPhilly's Avatar
MJPhilly MJPhilly is offline
SkyscraperSunset.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,174
I use a Canon 350D (Digital Rebel XT)

Lenses:
Sigma 18-200 mm F3.5-6.3
Canon 10-22 mm F3.5-4.5
Canon 50 mm F1.8
Canon 70-200 mm F2.8L IS
Canon 2x-II extender

Flash:
Canon Speedlite 430EX

In fact, I don't use it lately, and it's sad! I need to get back to shoooting more.
__________________
SkyscraperSunset.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2009, 5:31 PM
Sherman Cahal's Avatar
Sherman Cahal Sherman Cahal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 308
Nikon D3
Nikon N80

Sigma APO 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D
Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 AI (MF)
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG (macro)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2009, 5:53 PM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes View Post
Not regularly anymore. I do have a circa 1988 Minolta X700. I really did like that camera. It served me well. There's some evidence of its use in here.

I also use a Canon SD1100 IS when I'm lazy and want to travel light. Evidence of its use is here and here.
The film cams have interested me, but I don't know why. Many people find them appealing, but what is so great about them over Digital?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2009, 11:45 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
Nikon D300
Nikon 70-200 f/2.8
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2009, 9:14 AM
arbeiter's Avatar
arbeiter arbeiter is offline
passion for patterns
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,336
__________________
you should know that I'm womanly wise
my website/blog. or, my flickr site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > General Photography
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.