Study steers clear of suggestion by Penbrook officials
Traffic solution sits at red light
Monday, September 20, 2004
BY MARY KLAUS
Of The Patriot-News
No one seems to dispute the fact that little Penbrook has big traffic problems.
What is in dispute is how to fix those problems.
Penbrook -- which measures half a square mile and has nearly 2,800 residents -- has a dwindling business district that some blame on the borough's bumper-to-bumper traffic and lack of parking.
Walnut Street, Penbrook's main thoroughfare, lies in the middle of the 21/2-mile stretch between the state Capitol and Progress Avenue. That route gets 46,730 vehicles a day, said Diane Myers-Krug, transportation planner for the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission.
Two traffic studies involving Walnut Street are planned.
The first, a $1.3 million preliminary engineering study of the Walnut Street and Progress Avenue intersection in Susquehanna Twp., is a local initiative between the township and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, said James Szymborski, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission executive director.
The Tri-County Regional Planning Commission decides which midstate road projects are built. Szymborski said Susquehanna Twp. will pay $600,000 for the study and Dauphin County will pay $700,000.
The second study is a $100,000 Walnut Street-Route 22 corridor study including Harrisburg, Penbrook, Susquehanna Twp. and Lower Paxton Twp.
Szymborski said this study will be funded by an $80,000 federal grant, a $10,000 state Department of Economic Development grant and $2,500 from each of the four municipalities.
All municipalities except Harrisburg have come up with their $2,500. Dan Leppo, Harrisburg Department of Building & Housing Development deputy director for planning, said, "No money has been budgeted for it. I'm searching for money for the city's share."
Some Penbrook residents believe Penbrook should be included in the Susquehanna Twp. intersection study. Some residents say they feel "blindsided" that the Harrisburg Area Transportation Study did not agree or accept Penbrook's suggested solution.
James M. Armbruster, Penbrook Planning Commission chairman, said Penbrook's option involves making Herr Street in the borough one way. The option also calls for diverting westbound traffic from Walnut Street onto Herr Street, decreasing Walnut Street from four lanes to three with one westbound and two eastbound, and replacing parking on Walnut Street with parking in other areas.
Walnut Street is four lanes wide, with parking on alternate sides of the street.
In June, Jacquelyn Patton, president of the Susquehanna Twp. Board of Commissioners, wrote to Szymborski that the township engineer would include evaluation of Penbrook's option in the Susquehanna Twp. intersection study.
Harrisburg Mayor Stephen R. Reed said he favors including the Penbrook alternative in the Walnut Street corridor study. Szymborski agreed.
"The two studies are linked," he said. "But we believe the best place for Penbrook's alternative is in the entire corridor study not the intersection study. The two studies can be conducted concurrently."
Borough resident Dr. Scott Leedy told Borough Council that's not acceptable.
"We were told lies," Leedy said, referring to Patton's letter. He said, "Susquehanna Twp. officials even came to our township and saw we were willing to spend the money to have that included in the study."
Gary Myers, Susquehanna Twp. manager, said the intersection "has been failing for a while. We need to reconstruct it.
"The study, which HATS authorized, will take 18 months," Myers said. "After we choose an option, we will be four to five years away from construction. There will be plenty of time for input, including from Penbrook."
State Rep. Mark McNaughton, R-Dauphin, who attended the HATS meeting, prefers Penbrook in the Walnut Street corridor study "because the intersection study is of limited scope." He said that both studies later can be combined "in a master plan."
MARY KLAUS: 255-8113 or
mklaus@patriot-news.com