HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2011, 2:42 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
I just read in the allnovascotia.com that 80,000 people tune into EastlinkTV each week to watch the HRM Council proceedings. It is good to see that so many people take an interest in local politics. It must be one of the most popular shows in HRM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2011, 3:06 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Mayor, most councillors plan to re-offer
What shape next HRM government will take is yet to be determined in wake of URB call

The mayor and most Halifax regional councillors are planning to run for re-election next year, council members said Thursday.

But where councillors will run in October 2012 and which of their colleagues they may end up competing against are questions that remain unanswered.

The Chronicle Herald contacted all 23 councillors — 19 replied — and asked if they are intending to re-offer next year. Mayor Peter Kelly has repeatedly said it is his intention to seek another four-year term.

Most councillors who answered The Herald’s email survey said they are planning to run in 2012.

Coun. Bob Harvey (Lower Sackville) and Coun. Jerry Blumenthal (Halifax North End) won’t be re-offering.

The full story at the Chronicle Herald.

My two cents: Glad to see Jerry has decided to throw in the towel. Let the north end developments commence following the election!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2011, 7:26 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I was hoping McCluskey would also announce her retirement.

There's no guarantee of improvement but 23 -> 16 with Blumenthal gone is a good start!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2011, 9:20 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I was hoping McCluskey would also announce her retirement.

There's no guarantee of improvement but 23 -> 16 with Blumenthal gone is a good start!
Depending on how Dartmouth gets divided up, McCluskey may end up running against a number of her colleagues. Although frankly, I'd rather her than Barkhouse. At least McCluskey seems to have been reasonable when it has come to the Dartmouth viewplane exercise. Barkhouse - she might as well just write down her no vote on a piece of paper, fax it in and skip the public hearing. She's rarely been supportive of development.

It will also be interesting to see how the Halifax Peninsula gets divided up, because you could see one district where Watts, Sloane and Uteck end up having to run against each other. That could be quite interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2011, 9:44 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I'd say that McCluskey is mediocre when it comes to development issues. From what I have seen she follows the common and horrible "folk knowledge" school of decision making. For example, during the United Gulf sessions I recall her saying that she was almost blown over by the Maritime Centre and so tall buildings cause wind and that was that -- so much for studies done by qualified engineers!

McCluskey's worst quality as a regional councillor is her pro-Dartmouth parochialism. It is fine to like your district but she takes it to the point where it is impractical and poisonous to debate. Putting the new central library in Dartmouth would have been awful, for example, because it would have been much less convenient for the average user.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 8:03 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Boundary change process begins...

The boundary review process has begun. There are several scenarios which you can have input on.

Visit here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 8:16 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Thanks for posting this. At first glance I prefer Scenario 1, and I think that it is a better setup for the core than what we have currently. It would result in a North End and a South End + Downtown district, with the West End and Fairview merged into a third central district.

I dislike how right now the old North End and downtown are combined while "North of North" is its own separate district. My impression is that Dawn Sloane has closer ties to her North End constituents and that the South End/downtown/Spring Garden are more aligned. Blumenthal has the "Novalea" attitude and refused to allow the Hydrostone strip to be associated with the Gottingen/Agricola business district. People living North of North should be very interested in improving Gottingen!

I would actually like a special "downtown" district not based on population but unfortunately that would not be allowed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 8:38 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
I agree; I like scenario 1. There is a survey with the link too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 10:25 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,355
Scenario 1 definitely.

I suggested they move the boundary on Kearney Lake Road to better reflect neighbourhoods. Basically include all of the area west of Hwy 102 in one distict and move the boundary east of Hwy 102 to keep neighbourhoods intact.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 11:11 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
PS - this totally seems like one of those "illusion of choice" type surveys where afterward they can say "we did a survey! the people have spoken!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 11:11 PM
planarchy's Avatar
planarchy planarchy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 481
Only took a quick look, but neither seem like they will do much to strengthen the vote of the urban core. Option 1 even splits downtown Dartmouth into 3 parts - this seems ridiculous!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2011, 3:26 PM
beyeas beyeas is offline
Fizzix geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South End, Hali
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
I agree; I like scenario 1. There is a survey with the link too.
Another great reason to support scenario 1 is that Tim Bosquet supports scenario 2. I am taking the George Costanza approach to this and decide that whatever Bosquet thinks, I will do the opposite :-)

Admittedly though, I don't really think either necessarily improves urban representation all that much. Having said that, I think that there is no reasonable way to do that with the existing municipality anyway, unless downtown development issues were left purely to a local sub-committee made up of only urban councillors, and the only things that went to a vote of full council were by-laws and issues that have a budgetary impact etc that actually affect the entire region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2011, 5:10 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by beyeas View Post
Admittedly though, I don't really think either necessarily improves urban representation all that much. Having said that, I think that there is no reasonable way to do that with the existing municipality anyway, unless downtown development issues were left purely to a local sub-committee made up of only urban councillors, and the only things that went to a vote of full council were by-laws and issues that have a budgetary impact etc that actually affect the entire region.
This used to be the case with the Peninsula Community Council and it was even worse than regional council. The PCC only has 4 members and a tie vote means an application is denied, so 2 councillors could lock down the entire system and prevent proposals from even going to public hearing (funny how we tend to hear about how wonderful public consultation is only when it's convenient!). This is what happened to the original 27 storey brewery tower proposal in 2003 or so.

Basically if your council is made up of horrible members it doesn't matter if there are 4 of them or 23.

Fundamentally the problem with urban representation is that council seats are based on population and there are not many people living on the peninsula. That isn't going to be solved by fiddling with district boundaries.

My hope is that the larger districts will be a net win because they will improve the quality of candidates somewhat. Better suburban councillors could theoretically even help the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2011, 3:48 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,355
Looks like a new candiidate will announce his running for mayor tomorrow afternoon.

Tom Martin is a retired police officer who was an assistant in Shiela Fougere's mayoral race in 2008. He lives in Elmsdale (note not in HRM) and is currently a farmer. He worked for Halifax Regional Police for thirty years
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2011, 10:58 AM
Wishblade's Avatar
Wishblade Wishblade is offline
You talkin' to me?
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
Looks like a new candiidate will announce his running for mayor tomorrow afternoon.

Tom Martin is a retired police officer who was an assistant in Shiela Fougere's mayoral race in 2008. He lives in Elmsdale (note not in HRM) and is currently a farmer. He worked for Halifax Regional Police for thirty years

Great just what we need, A farmer from Elmsdale running the show
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2011, 12:20 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,004
This guys good. I'll vouch for him. I worked on Sheila's campaign with him.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.