HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 2:59 PM
Dr.Z Dr.Z is offline
From the Planning Paradox
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I just checked and Orleans and Barrhaven are in the urban area, but Kanata (and all of the rural areas all around the city) is not.

I agree that it makes no sense. Both Orleans and Barrhaven are also separated by non-urbanized land from the central area, but the space for Kanata is "just enough"...
Forget the "population centre" (replaces "large urban") geography. Its an obscure measurement and the reporter somehow came across it and thought it was a proxy for the City of Ottawa. I can't believe though no one looked at the 735,000 figure and thought, yup that sounds right.

The main geographies are CMA, CMA (ON part/QC part), Census Division/Subdivision. Stick with those and you'll be on the same playing field as everyone else.

What's interesting is that the 2015 estimate for Ottawa (City) based on 2011 Census is higher than the unadjusted 2016 Census.
__________________
"What about the children?! Won't somebody please think of the children!?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.