HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2021, 6:40 PM
PHLJD13 PHLJD13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 148
Even more hand-wringing about the demolition of the buildings on this parcel.

https://hiddencityphila.org/2021/10/...ation-process/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2021, 7:45 PM
PHL10's Avatar
PHL10 PHL10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLJD13 View Post
Even more hand-wringing about the demolition of the buildings on this parcel.

https://hiddencityphila.org/2021/10/...ation-process/
I think the bigger problem is that the preservation needs to be proactive, not reactive. There's no reason that at least in the core of Center City that all the prominent buildings that meet the criteria are declared historic. It's tough to wait for a building owner to come up with a proposal and then scramble to try to certify a property.

So as much as political pressure on the historic commission may be questionable, so is trying to certify structures only after a development plan to presented to the city.
__________________
I've been living under a rock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2021, 8:02 PM
skyhigh07 skyhigh07 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 987
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLJD13 View Post
Even more hand-wringing about the demolition of the buildings on this parcel.

https://hiddencityphila.org/2021/10/...ation-process/
I don’t think that was the point of the article. The buildings have long since been demolished. If there are ethics violations coming from the Mayor’s Office in regards to historic preservation, that certainly needs to be addressed. The city unfortunately has a long history of corruption - anything that sheds light on it shouldn’t be minimized or swept under the rug in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2021, 8:27 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,637
While I don't think that the buildings that were demolished to make way for this project should have been on the register, I agree that the Historical Commission needs to be looked at. There are a surprising number of buildings that really should be nominated that aren't.

I would even incredibly begrudgingly admit that the Robinson Building should probably be on there.

But surprise surprise, Kenney is a shitbag.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2021, 1:52 PM
Redddog Redddog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
While I don't think that the buildings that were demolished to make way for this project should have been on the register, I agree that the Historical Commission needs to be looked at. There are a surprising number of buildings that really should be nominated that aren't.

I would even incredibly begrudgingly admit that the Robinson Building should probably be on there.

But surprise surprise, Kenney is a shitbag.
The Robinson building is a tough one. It's certainly interesting and different. But that doesn't change the fact that it's ugly as sh$t.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2021, 2:03 PM
PHL10's Avatar
PHL10 PHL10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redddog View Post
The Robinson building is a tough one. It's certainly interesting and different. But that doesn't change the fact that it's ugly as sh$t.
More importantly, functionally, it's a poor building. What good is a 5-story attached building with no windows?
__________________
I've been living under a rock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2021, 3:36 AM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHL10 View Post
More importantly, functionally, it's a poor building. What good is a 5-story attached building with no windows?
Yea I feel like I'm generally one of the more preservationist minded members of this forum, but I'm definitely of the opinion that ultimate goal of historic preservation is to make the city a better place to live. Diverse and interesting architecture is valuable to those who live here, but only to a point. Urban functionality is in the end, of greater importance. Generally there is no real distinction between pushing for good urban principles and historic preservation, but every once in a while you have these outliers, buildings that are architecturally important but which are a drag on their surroundings. The Robinson building and the South Broad health clinic both come to mind. At the end of the day I want to live in a city, not a museum.

Overall though, I think buildings that warrant historic protection not receiving any protection is 100 times more of an issue than unworthy buildings receiving protection is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2021, 6:22 PM
Insoluble Insoluble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 655
Walked by this during my lunch today. It looks like they're doing something here to shore up the buildings adjacent to this. I'm just glad to see something happening at this site finally, it's been dead for months.

20211014_131915 (photo by me)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 7:37 PM
TK2001's Avatar
TK2001 TK2001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Not your business
Posts: 2,493
Possibly stucco work?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2021, 8:02 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
At least something is happening! Good sign hopefully
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2021, 7:14 PM
nemesisinphilly nemesisinphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 181
Building permit issued today

Does this mean the appeal has been exhausted:

https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=359665022
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2021, 7:18 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemesisinphilly View Post
Does this mean the appeal has been exhausted:

https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=359665022
Sounds like it.

Also sounds like this will have 32 residential floors, and 2 mech floors. Making this a 34 story building.

It might just barely scrape 400'.


Actually, looking back at the OG CDR submission, this seems to still be the original plans! We're still getting a 400+er!

https://www.phila.gov/media/20200805...CZ-Reduced.pdf
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 2:19 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
Boom! Love to see it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 3:39 AM
arkitect13 arkitect13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 388
I think much like the arthaus, this will/should have a profound impact on the skyline from the east, south, and driving south on i-95. I really hope this looks as good when finished as it does in renderings. Hopefully it has a lighting package for those, idk what to call them, concrete fins? on the top
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 7:05 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
Permits Issued For Tower At 204 South 12th Street





Read/view more here:
https://phillyyimby.com/2021/11/perm...uare-west.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2021, 7:02 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
You gotta be f***ing me

Height Reduction Confirmed For Residential High-Rise Planned At 204 South 12th Street



Quote:
Last month, YIMBY reported that construction permits were issued for the residential high-rise proposed at 204 South 12th Street in Midtown Village, Center City. We noted that while the floor count remained the same at 32, the unit count for the rental property was reduced from 448 to 378. Now, in a statement provided to YIMBY, BLT Architects, the architect of record for the project, has announced that the currently planned height for the building registers at 366 feet above ground. This represents a 79-foot decrease from the originally stated height of 445 feet.

At the moment, we are unable to confirm any further details regarding the updated design. However, it is unlikely that the building will undergo a significant change of the overall aesthetic, since the project retains the same design and development team, with Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners as the design architect and Midwood Investment & Development as the developer.
Read/view more here:
https://phillyyimby.com/2021/12/heig...nter-city.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2021, 9:23 PM
PHLtoNYC PHLtoNYC is offline
Chris
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,977
Boo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2021, 12:32 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2021, 10:42 PM
cardeza cardeza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,381
those pictures show the same situation that has been present at that site for the last 3 months or more. No real construction. Hopefully that changes soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2021, 11:25 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,040
shame about the height chop, although 79ft isn't the end of the world. Also RIP Richard Rogers. This will be one of the last projects of his era at Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners.
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.