HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 12:33 PM
Halifax's Avatar
Halifax Halifax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 219
I don't see any problem with the 25, but the way things are going - I would be happy with the 20. It would bring some urbanity to the area and would be quite visible from the Dartmouth side being on a higher elevation. Not a huge fan of the color choices but still a nice building!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 1:08 PM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,227
I am VERY skeptical of those renderings. There's no way you can have that much glass wall and meet energy code requirements. I suspect that if this gets built it'll be much less "light and airy".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 2:42 PM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,130
The problem with 20, from an aesthetic perspective, is that the building is designed to be closer to 30 storeys. It looks okay at 25, but at 20 it'd be, well, stubby and much less graceful looking.

I think the original proposed height was fine for the location, but in the interests of pragmatism I'd like to see the Centre Plan finalized and all of this debate end. I'd rather see the project move forward on that assumption, and redesigned appropriately.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2018, 7:10 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
The problem with 20, from an aesthetic perspective, is that the building is designed to be closer to 30 storeys. It looks okay at 25, but at 20 it'd be, well, stubby and much less graceful looking.

Stubby and sawed off is now called "The Halifax School of Architecture".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 2:01 AM
lawsond lawsond is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
Stubby and sawed off is now called "The Halifax School of Architecture".
Sadly, you are correct. The skyline now looks smaller and duller than it did before the new slabs went up. It’s all context. When they built the hulking “bow”in Calgary it made the whole skyline shrink because of its width. Ah well. At least we have our fantastic library and that wonderful new Argyle St.
__________________
lawsond
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2018, 11:47 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,479
Just appears to be another case of typical modern uninspired architecture. You could make it 40 floors and it still would be 'meh'. You can only do so much to a glass box to try to make it not look like every other glass box, so... "meh".

On another note, I find it slightly humourous how the reflections on the renderings are done in a way to make it appear 'light and airy' - like you can almost look through the building, when in fact it it is just concrete and steel with relatively featureless glass and cladding, like every other new building out there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2018, 12:02 AM
ILoveHalifax ILoveHalifax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Palm Beach Gardens FL
Posts: 1,059
I quite like the willow leaves on the glass and much better than the leaves on the library glass
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2018, 2:02 AM
mleblanc mleblanc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveHalifax View Post
I quite like the willow leaves on the glass and much better than the leaves on the library glass
Library glass also looked much better in renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2018, 1:28 PM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
I read an article saying residents feel 25 stories is unreasonable for the location. 25 stories . If not a MAJOR commercial strip in the heart of the city, then where? And 25 stories is really not that high. That said I believe the centre plan sets the limit there to 20?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2018, 3:03 PM
bluenoser's Avatar
bluenoser bluenoser is offline
hi
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 624
We are the Skyscraper Condemnation Affiliate.
God save Tudor houses, antique tables, and billiards.

Last edited by bluenoser; Jan 15, 2018 at 3:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 5:03 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
The public hearing was last night. Every wingnut NIMBY came out of the woodwork. People were crying, sobbing, singing... it was simply ridiculous. It was so bad that the Haivens, who led off the proceedings, came across as somewhat reasonable in comparison. What a waste of time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 6:26 PM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
The public hearing was last night. Every wingnut NIMBY came out of the woodwork. People were crying, sobbing, singing... it was simply ridiculous. It was so bad that the Haivens, who led off the proceedings, came across as somewhat reasonable in comparison. What a waste of time.
Except for the part where Larry Haiven quoted Martin Luther King: ""If you stick a knife in my back nine inches and pull it out six inches, there's no progress.” To be clear, MLK was talking about civil rights and racial justice. Haiven was talking about five storeys on a building he doesn't like. (To give a sense of the delusional grandiosity in the man's thinking.)

Anyway, council voted 16-1 today (Lorelei Nicoll voting against) to defer the matter until March, pending a staff report on density bonusing. Which means they've basically decided they're open to 25 storeys, if Armco sweetens the pot vis-a-vis public benefits. I believe the main thing they'd be looking for us more affordable-housing units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 7:14 PM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
I find it incredibly offensive that people would use MLKs words to express their feeling about a freekin’ apartment build they don’t like. Yup... building heights and fighter for the right not to be murdered for being black... totally the same thing. These NIMBYs disgust me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2018, 10:08 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeo View Post
I find it incredibly offensive that people would use MLKs words to express their feeling about a freekin’ apartment build they don’t like. Yup... building heights and fighter for the right not to be murdered for being black... totally the same thing. These NIMBYs disgust me.
I share your view
__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 1:48 AM
TheNovaScotian's Avatar
TheNovaScotian TheNovaScotian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
The public hearing was last night. Every wingnut NIMBY came out of the woodwork. People were crying, sobbing, singing... it was simply ridiculous. It was so bad that the Haivens, who led off the proceedings, came across as somewhat reasonable in comparison. What a waste of time.
The crying mother was a bit much they rushed her so she could explain how Vancouver was ruined by tall buildings and we should only allow 5 story as the maximum for all buildings quoting a Netflix documentary.

Listening to all the old self righteous blue hairs call anyone who supported the development stupid and quotes like "I don't think that man has a grade school education." riled me up and took everything in my power not to point out the stupidity of their own positions.

Another quotable line of the night was Councillor Lindell Smith grasping at straws and asking "Do shadows make it more difficult to make ice on the Oval?"

I have to say the developer has worked well with what was asked by the city. The affordable housing units are in-line with the Centre Plan, they are receptive of burying the utilities, and have a built in bus shelter.

I began to wonder about the fabled Centre Plan and applied the same logic people seem to be using. I don't want any buildings being approved until RP-60 is passed and all homes will need to have a flying car port or they don't get an occupancy permit. Cold fusion reactors in every home too. Staff will someday be preparing RP-60 so we should pause the city exactly where it is until we pass that mythical plan. I know the Centre Plan is closer to completion but until it is voted on and passed into law, each are just as applicable when talking about right now.
Sorry for the rant just still stewing after last night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 1:52 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
^^^ Good rant, no need to apologize!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 3:56 AM
Colin May Colin May is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,487
The usual NDP crowd of well off pensioners then moved on to Timmies today.

The score last night : Old Farts 0 Younger folks 1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 11:24 AM
ILoveHalifax ILoveHalifax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Palm Beach Gardens FL
Posts: 1,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin May View Post
The usual NDP crowd of well off pensioners then moved on to Timmies today.

The score last night : Old Farts 0 Younger folks 1
ENOUGH blaming OLD FARTS. I am almost 71 and far more supportive of development and tall buildings than many of the younger folks on this forum. Please be more respectful with your BROAD BRUSH
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 1:17 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin May View Post
The usual NDP crowd of well off pensioners then moved on to Timmies today.

The score last night : Old Farts 0 Younger folks 1

I think that despite his usual bloviating about it being TOO TALL, his "but Centre Plan!" BS, and pandering to the likes of the Haivens and their moneyed south-end ilk, "No Waye" Mason is going to lose this one, based upon the discussions I read about at Council on Wednesday.

It would be far more useful for an elected member to focus on maximizing the street-level public benefits instead of demonizing height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2018, 2:03 PM
yal yal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveHalifax View Post
ENOUGH blaming OLD FARTS. I am almost 71 and far more supportive of development and tall buildings than many of the younger folks on this forum. Please be more respectful with your BROAD BRUSH
You can be an exception but it doesn't change the fact that it is the old people making fool of themselves in public hearings and holding this city hostage with their nimbyism.

EDIT: Would like to add "mostly old people"

Last edited by yal; Jan 18, 2018 at 2:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.