Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB
Perhaps adding a longer, dedicated acceleration lane and ramp metering would help solve the issue?
Adding a third lane from West Hawk/Falcon Lake to Winnipeg for seasonal cottage traffic doesn't sound viable.
Another alternative would be to lower the speed east of the merge points and force through traffic into a single lane. That would create gaps to allow the traffic to merge into the existing flow. Or perhaps temporary traffic lights to control the flow and allow traffic to merge in. Both options could be limited in operation to peak volume times and would have minimal expense to implement.
|
Okay I have to be frank here. This is why Manitoba infrastructure sucks.
(1) In Ontario, we have built divided freeways(!) for cottage traffic (well, mixed with long haul commercial traffic), in the sparsely populated central and northeastern parts of the province. If Ontario, which typically has a hard time justifying such expenditure, can do it, I honestly can’t see why Manitoba isn’t able to twin the remainder of TCH.
(2)&(3) A super-2 is still a freeway. A speed limit of 100 kph appropriate, and there must be absolutely no stop lights (like, actually). What you’re describing seems to be an issue of capacity (I’ll let engineers on SSP weigh in), which can only be addressed by increasing roadway capacity, i.e. twinning here.
Edit: I just see your new comment. How do you merge traffic into single lane when each direction only gets 1 lane to begin with?
Ps: Sorry I have to be harsh as I see it necessary to discourage this line of thinking.