HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4381  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 2:15 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,028
CP would have worked much better if cabs and rideshare were exempt. It should only apply to privately owned vehicles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4382  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 2:28 AM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,039
Congestion pricing: How do people get to Hochul’s favorite Midtown diners? Mainly by foot and transit

By Ben Brachfeld
Posted on June 10, 2024




We spoke to 25 customers across the three diners and asked them how they arrived: 21 of them got there on foot or by mass transit, while only three drove a car and one took a cab.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/congest...iners-transit/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4383  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 11:29 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 31,207
There are rumors there might be some compromise brewing, where Hochul might try and save face.

There might still be CP, but it will start at a lower rate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4384  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 2:12 PM
dchan's Avatar
dchan dchan is online now
No grabbing my banana!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 10021
Posts: 2,844
Really, people from NJ are actually going (never mind driving) to these three mediocre midtown diners when they can go to the awesome Tops Diner in East Newark?

Video Link


Seriously, do yourselves a favor and go to Tops Diner sometime. I had the best chicken and waffles there that I ever had.

Or if Tops is packed, go to another NJ diner. NJ is known for diners, most of which are probably better than these mediocre Midtown diners and definitely significantly less expensive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
There are rumors there might be some compromise brewing, where Hochul might try and save face.

There might still be CP, but it will start at a lower rate.
Not surprised, considering the complete brouhaha that her office has been facing. CP advocates are totally pissed, and the MTA is pissed.

Hochul is in a position of "stupid or liar". She's either a complete idiot, or she's lying through her teeth with BS reasoning.

My main concern is one that I've known since I did my research project 15+ years ago. To wean drivers away from driving, you need very good to excellent quality transportation alternatives. And this is one area where I can't fault drivers here. Where are our excellent transportation alternatives?

I certainly don't trust the MTA much of the time. The MTA has stolen way too much of our valuable time through constant delays, whether through normal operations, scheduled maintenance, or unforeseen circumstances. As I have written many times, I won't evade fares, but I will definitely avoid using the MTA if I can help it.

And if CP goes through again, will the MTA significantly increase good quality (fast with no unexplained BS slowdowns) weekend and mid-day service to provide an "very good transportation alternative" to travelers priced out from driving? Let's see.

Likewise, will we see better bike and e-mobility infrastructure to provide another good transportation alternative? Will bike and e-mobility users have routes that don't conflict with speeding crazy drivers? Will they have the ability to park somewhere without worrying that their bike or e-vehicle will be stolen?
__________________
I take the high road because it's the only route on my GPS nowadays. #selfsatisfied

Last edited by dchan; Jun 11, 2024 at 2:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4385  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 3:26 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post
My main concern is one that I've known since I did my research project 15+ years ago. To wean drivers away from driving, you need very good to excellent quality transportation alternatives. And this is one area where I can't fault drivers here. Where are our excellent transportation alternatives?

I certainly don't trust the MTA much of the time. The MTA has stolen way too much of our valuable time through constant delays, whether through normal operations, scheduled maintenance, or unforeseen circumstances. As I have written many times, I won't evade fares, but I will definitely avoid using the MTA if I can help it.

And if CP goes through again, will the MTA significantly increase good quality (fast with no unexplained BS slowdowns) weekend and mid-day service to provide an "very good transportation alternative" to travelers priced out from driving? Let's see.
While I mostly agree, this part seems like a bit of a stretch. The idea that one of the cities with the most extensive transit systems in the world that already manages to provide the around half the transit trips in the entire country and the majority of trips in the city still can't support congestion pricing because it isn't perfect. Well driving isn't perfect either as there's a constant possibility of unexpected slow downs from things like accidents, construction etc. Yet transit had to be held to such a high standard that it's immune? Well that's just not realistic.

But fortunately, CP doesn't need wean most drivers away from their cars because congestion, when not exasperated by other factors, is caused by excess road usage that exceeds capacity not by an appropriate number of vehicles using the capacity available. And that excess usage can be a fairly small percentage of the total. So for CP to work well it only needs to dissuade a small percentage of drivers, or dissuade a larger percentage of drivers a small percentage of the time. In fact, if it pushed all or most drivers out of their cars it wouldn't make any money because there'd be no one to pay the charge or not enough people to counteract the administration costs. So one of the biggest benefits of CP would be lost.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4386  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 4:24 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
Congestion pricing: How do people get to Hochul’s favorite Midtown diners? Mainly by foot and transit

By Ben Brachfeld
Posted on June 10, 2024




We spoke to 25 customers across the three diners and asked them how they arrived: 21 of them got there on foot or by mass transit, while only three drove a car and one took a cab.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/congest...iners-transit/
Most business owners in urban areas have super wrong ideas about how their customers actually arrive at their places. Those same owners will also typically drive to their business in their personal vehicles so they see everything through that lens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4387  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 6:15 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
CP would have worked much better if cabs and rideshare were exempt. It should only apply to privately owned vehicles.
Cabs and rideshares would only be charged once per day, so they would likely make money from the surcharge if they enter the zone multiple times per day. I do think they should've exempted private bus operators, but not because it would be an unaffordable charge. It just gave opponents of the CP plan another angle to attack it, while the revenue from private bus services would be minimal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4388  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 1:06 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Cabs and rideshares would only be charged once per day, so they would likely make money from the surcharge if they enter the zone multiple times per day. I do think they should've exempted private bus operators, but not because it would be an unaffordable charge. It just gave opponents of the CP plan another angle to attack it, while the revenue from private bus services would be minimal.
in part this is where there is room for a compromise -- i would hope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4389  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 1:09 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post
Really, people from NJ are actually going (never mind driving) to these three mediocre midtown diners when they can go to the awesome Tops Diner in East Newark?

Video Link


Seriously, do yourselves a favor and go to Tops Diner sometime. I had the best chicken and waffles there that I ever had.

Or if Tops is packed, go to another NJ diner. NJ is known for diners, most of which are probably better than these mediocre Midtown diners and definitely significantly less expensive.

i looked at the menu here and not to mention, but the breakfast dishes are literally half the price of ps. eat something before you come in!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4390  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2024, 1:54 PM
dchan's Avatar
dchan dchan is online now
No grabbing my banana!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 10021
Posts: 2,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
i looked at the menu here and not to mention, but the breakfast dishes are literally half the price of ps. eat something before you come in!
Well, not quite half, but Tops is definitely several dollars cheaper and probably better (I haven't been to Pershing Square to eat yet, nor do I have any interest in overpriced diner food).

Actually, I did manage to find a plum free parking spot one block south of Pershing Square on a Friday night during the December holiday season. It was a little past 7pm, and the spots on Park Av along the viaduct had just switched from commercial-only to free for all. I was the only car there. So maybe I'm the driver that Governor Hochul is talking about.
__________________
I take the high road because it's the only route on my GPS nowadays. #selfsatisfied
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4391  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 1:09 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
i looked at the menu here and not to mention, but the breakfast dishes are literally half the price of ps. eat something before you come in!
They switched owners during the pandemic and demolished their old 1920s trolley car diner for a new diner...and 3x the prices..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4392  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 3:26 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 31,207
So the Biden administration formally signed off on congestion pricing today.

The only person standing in the way of a June 30 start is Kathy Hochul.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4393  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2024, 11:03 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post
Well, not quite half, but Tops is definitely several dollars cheaper and probably better (I haven't been to Pershing Square to eat yet, nor do I have any interest in overpriced diner food).

Actually, I did manage to find a plum free parking spot one block south of Pershing Square on a Friday night during the December holiday season. It was a little past 7pm, and the spots on Park Av along the viaduct had just switched from commercial-only to free for all. I was the only car there. So maybe I'm the driver that Governor Hochul is talking about.
i saw the egg dishes on the menu there were $15 and the amny said $30 for ps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4394  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2024, 11:05 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,039
speaking of — food for lawsuits if she don’t sign off —




Congestion pricing: Feds give final approval, seem to counter Hochul’s economic reasoning for pausing Manhattan tolls

By Ben BrachfeldPosted on June 16, 2024


The Federal Highway Administration’s final approval for the MTA’s now-shelved congestion pricing program gave plaudits to the tolling scheme which Gov. Kathy Hochul scuttled for the sake of easing economic costs to drivers.

On the contrary, the approval decision on June 14 seemed to indicate that congestion pricing would provide significant economic benefits, including “travel-time savings and travel-time reliability improvements, as well as reduced vehicle operating costs.” 


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/congest...nhattan-tolls/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4395  
Old Posted Yesterday, 12:26 PM
dchan's Avatar
dchan dchan is online now
No grabbing my banana!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 10021
Posts: 2,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
i saw the egg dishes on the menu there were $15 and the amny said $30 for ps.
The PSC online menu says it's $19 for eggs with bacon, home fries, and toast. The same dish is $15.50 at Tops Diner. So PSC is certainly expensive, but not $30 for eggs and meat expensive.
__________________
I take the high road because it's the only route on my GPS nowadays. #selfsatisfied
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4396  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:14 PM
Gantz Gantz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
While I mostly agree, this part seems like a bit of a stretch. The idea that one of the cities with the most extensive transit systems in the world that already manages to provide the around half the transit trips in the entire country and the majority of trips in the city still can't support congestion pricing because it isn't perfect. Well driving isn't perfect either as there's a constant possibility of unexpected slow downs from things like accidents, construction etc. Yet transit had to be held to such a high standard that it's immune? Well that's just not realistic.

But fortunately, CP doesn't need wean most drivers away from their cars because congestion, when not exasperated by other factors, is caused by excess road usage that exceeds capacity not by an appropriate number of vehicles using the capacity available. And that excess usage can be a fairly small percentage of the total. So for CP to work well it only needs to dissuade a small percentage of drivers, or dissuade a larger percentage of drivers a small percentage of the time. In fact, if it pushed all or most drivers out of their cars it wouldn't make any money because there'd be no one to pay the charge or not enough people to counteract the administration costs. So one of the biggest benefits of CP would be lost.
CP has nothing to do with actual road congestion. If it did, they wouldn't have it during the night or weekends. Its just used to get extra tax revenue.
If they wanted to seriously tackle congestion, they would instead make necessary infrastructure improvements to divert flows of traffic away (for example, not funnel Long Island commuters into NYC every time they want to drive to mainland US), improve mass transit to make people choose it instead of a car, or to fix actual congestion issues in Manhattan itself - #1 issue is the double parking from delivery vehicles/trucks, not the actual number of cars on the road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4397  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:41 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
CP has nothing to do with actual road congestion. If it did, they wouldn't have it during the night or weekends. Its just used to get extra tax revenue.
If they wanted to seriously tackle congestion, they would instead make necessary infrastructure improvements to divert flows of traffic away (for example, not funnel Long Island commuters into NYC every time they want to drive to mainland US), improve mass transit to make people choose it instead of a car, or to fix actual congestion issues in Manhattan itself - #1 issue is the double parking from delivery vehicles/trucks, not the actual number of cars on the road.
That's actually a common myth that you can prevent congestion using transit or traffic flow changes in major cities. in reality, there is simply too much demand to handle meaning that there's congestion regardless of how much or little transit there is or how much or little road capacity there is. So there's congestion in both Tokyo and LA, Paris and Houston, Moscow and Toronto. And there can be congestion at practically any time in such large and dense cities. But you're right in that it isn't only about congestion since raising funds for infrastructure improvements is also an important goal. And investing the time, money, and political will in setting up such a program is expensive so it doesn't make sense to leave huge amounts of potential revenue on the table. But to claim that because it has another important goal besides congestion that it has "nothing to do with congestion" just just plain false. Whether or not a particular implementation of CP is done in a way that one likes or agrees with has no bearing on the underlying concept which is sound.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4398  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:56 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,039
watch out automated bus camera ticketing is starting —



Automated ticketing of drivers blocking MTA bus stops begins this week

Drivers who block bus stops will soon be ticketed under a new program using cameras mounted to the front of MTA buses, transit officials announced on Monday.

The initiative expands an existing pilot program that used cameras on 600 MTA buses to automatically ticket drivers who illegally block bus lanes on 14 routes. Now, the technology will be updated to ticket drivers blocking any bus stop — not just ones with dedicated bus lanes.

More than 1,000 buses total on 32 routes will be outfitted with the cameras by the end of the year, according to the MTA. For the next 60 days, drivers caught parking or double parking at bus stops will receive warnings, transit officials officials said at a press conference in Washington Heights.

more:
https://gothamist.com/news/automated...gins-this-week
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4399  
Old Posted Yesterday, 9:03 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
CP has nothing to do with actual road congestion. If it did, they wouldn't have it during the night or weekends. Its just used to get extra tax revenue.
If they wanted to seriously tackle congestion, they would instead make necessary infrastructure improvements to divert flows of traffic away (for example, not funnel Long Island commuters into NYC every time they want to drive to mainland US), improve mass transit to make people choose it instead of a car, or to fix actual congestion issues in Manhattan itself - #1 issue is the double parking from delivery vehicles/trucks, not the actual number of cars on the road.
How would Long Islanders ever avoid NYC when commuting to destinations beyond? Or do you mean Manhattan? There are bypasses for Long Island drivers to get to NJ, Westchester and CT, without going through Manhattan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4400  
Old Posted Yesterday, 9:31 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,541
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.