HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 7:43 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Barrington Street Fades

From The Coast - http://www.thecoast.ca/Articles-i-20...eet_fades.html

Barrington Street fades

Halifax's downtown retail core used to be Barrington Street. But businesses are closing at an alarming rate, leaving papered-over windows, an abandoned street-scape and a sense of despair.

by Lindsay McCarney




Read Carsten Knox's companion piece on the history of Barrington Street here.
It's the first Wednesday morning in April and a white truck is parked on Barrington. The truck itself is pretty unremarkable---until a couple of men emerge from the storefront it's parked beside carrying boxes stuffed with plastic shelving units. Then the vehicle's purpose becomes clear. Just four days before, the retail space the men are leaving was still home to The Book Room. The movers place their boxes into the truck without ceremony. No one stops to play a bugle, or give a speech and neither of them look very sorrowful. The job they're completing is probably just one task in a day chock full of them. The woman standing in the store's doorway watching them has her hands on her hips. Maybe she doesn't like the way the moving job is going, maybe she's sad, maybe that's just how she stands. After a moment she goes back into the empty storefront, locking the door behind her. The sign above the door still reads "Canada's oldest bookstore." It, too, will soon be gone.

While talks are apparently in the works, a new tenant for the space has yet to be found.

Across the street and a few doors down, the Freemasons' building boasts its own new void. The storefront that for 12 years was home to vintage boutique Junk & Foibles (a 29-year-veteran of the downtown core) has hand-cut orange construction paper letters taped up in its window. "So Long," they read. They're accompanied by a smattering of red hearts. It makes me wonder whether the staff planned the display ahead of time, or whether the words were an afterthought---letters cut on a whim and taped in the window on the way out the door. Whatever their history, by the following Sunday the letters have been taken down. Only the paper hearts are left.



The store closures are the two latest on a street that's gradually beginning to look more and more left behind. Up the street, at 1656 Barrington, the old Sam the Record Man space, vacant since its abrupt closure last February, is heartbreakingly devoid of CDs. While all signs indicate the building was recently sold, a new owner for the space hasn't been announced. (The sale of the building to a local developer was scheduled to finalize March 31. Dan Sangster, of realtor JJ Barnicke Atlantic Limited which handled the sale, is unable to confirm whetherthe sale went through, but the "For Sale" sign in the window was taken down early this month.)

Meanwhile, across the way, the former Dooly's space in the Roy Building has been vacant for about a year and the Starfish Properties paper in the building's ground-level windows taunts us with its cute starfish-shaped blotches and lack of concrete information about what the company's plans for the space might be.

Unsurprisingly, all these empty spaces and papered-over windows evoke unease about Barrington's current health as a street. They certainly look like cause for concern. Which, of course, raises the question that Haligonians have been asking for decades---ever since the 1960s, when the street, once a focal point for city activity and commerce, began to slip in popularity as mall culture sprung up in the suburbs and businesses slowly began trickling away: Is Barrington in trouble?


Store owner Jeremy Smith doesn't think it is. "There are no issues with Barrington," he says. "I think it's just the natural turnaround of the street."

Granted, Smith, along with his wife, Erin, owns popular candy store Freak Lunchbox (opened in 2001) and the nearby Peepshow Girly Boutique (opened in 2005), two of Barrington's most successful businesses. But that's just the point, he says. "I think my businesses should be an indication that there's nothing to fear on Barrington."

Neither shop has seen any decline in business, even with the spate of Barrington store closures in the last year, Smith adds. In fact, "Freak is actually a little busier."



Most of the people I speak with agree with at least one of Smith's points. His stores---particularly Freak Lunchbox---are working. "They're the coolest candy store in Halifax," says Junk & Foibles owner Sarah Dunsworth. Since her business is one of the street's recent closures, Dunsworth is more disappointed than Smith about Barrington and its failure to be a unique and livelybusiness district. But she says Freak Lunchbox is "one of the things that's been helpful for Barrington.

"Everybody wants to walk downhere---stroll down Barrington to get toFreak Lunchbox."

Opinion-wise, Smith has yet another surprise up his sleeve. He thinks the empty Dooly's space in the Roy Building is positive for the street. "In combination with the Sam the Record Man [closure], it kind of hurts public perception. But I think the opportunity to let a big retailer in there---is a good thing," he says.

Of course, Smith has an inkling of the magic that could soon be happening behind those starfish-bespeckled window papers in the Roy Building. His landlord for the Peepshow Girly Boutique is Starfish Properties director (and Roy Building owner)Louis Reznick.

Historically, Reznick and his company have been kind to Barrington. They take care of their buildings. Reznick is responsible for a hefty renovation to the building that houses Peepshow and the Atlantic branch of Telefilm Canada. The outside of the building was shined up and Gyprock walls inside were stripped away. The project was helmed by David Garrett, a local architect whose name tends to pop up when the subject of Barrington revitalization is being discussed. (In 1998, Garrett was one of the key consultants for a report compiled for the municipality, province and Downtown Halifax Business Commission, entitled Downtown Barrington: A Strategy for the Rejuvenation of Barrington Street Halifax.)

"[Reznick] really looks after his buildings and really spends the money that is needed, that's required," says Suzanne Saul, co-owner of contemporary furniture store Attica Furnishings, another of Barrington's more recent business success stories and housed in another Starfish property. The store, which moved to Barrington from Granville the summer before last, expanded thispast December.

Attica, and the building that it is in (1566 Barrington), are often mentioned when people ask what's currently working about Barrington Street. They're cited as proof the street's not all empty storefronts and neglected facades. But back in 1998, when the Garrett report was released, the building wasn't impressing Garrett and his research team. "At present, the building is unoccupied and in a deteriorating state," says the report. "Some of its upper windows are open to the elements."

The building's new life is the result of another Starfish Properties-commissioned renovation, aimed at preparing the space for then-tenant UpCountry. Among the improvements made during the project was a restoration of the building's originalfrontage. Brickwork was chipped back toreveal the fancy pillars that now flank Attica's entrance.

By all accounts, the Roy Building's on its way to a similar rejuvenation. Moreover, the ground level of the building wasn't vacated by a failing business actively fleeing Barrington. Reznick chose not to let Dooly's renew its lease because he wanted to renovate and find a different kind of tenant for the building. That's Smith's assessment of the situation: "He'll let [a property] sit empty until the end of time until he finds the right tenant." That's also what Downtown Halifax Business Commission executive director Paul MacKinnon says is going on---that the Roy Building's being prepped for a "massive renovation." Local representatives of Starfish chose not to be interviewed and Reznick, based in Toronto, prefers not to be interviewed by phone.

"He purchased the building with plans in mind," says MacKinnon about Reznick's Roy Building acquisition. "It could go to a single tenant, which would be very impressive. It could be broken up---I think he's looking at a number of different options." However, as far as MacKinnon knows, Starfish is looking to put retail in the building's ground floor.

All this, of course, is the same information that those familiar with the project provided when approached by The Coast's Shoptalk column last July, and it's unclear whether much progress has been made with the property since. Moreover, shoppers ambling up Barrington don't see any indication of the building's potentially exciting future. They see an empty building and blue window-papers. Some of the drunker amblers even see a convenient place to relieve themselves. Impatient urinators have been known to drop trou in the Roy Building's doorway.

The delay in the announcement of plans for the space---and a similar lack of information about the Sam the Record Man storefront's future---have contributed to public worry about the street, MacKinnon concedes. "The regular customer is just going to see the boarded-up windows," he says. "There's no reason why they would know some of the story behind it."

Part of the hold-up with the process could be the same thing that's delaying many other promised refurbishments on the street, including the restoration of the fire-ravaged former National Film Board building (beside Attica). Building owners are waiting to see what happens with the infamous Barrington Street Historic District plan which, if approved in its current state, will provide tax credits and grants to Barrington owners who restore their buildings in accordance with certain preservation guidelines.

HRM heritage planner Bill Plaskett, one of the members of the historic district steering committee, says as far as he knows, the Roy Building renovations are one of several upgrades to the street "poised to take place" when and if the historic district plan is approved by council. Similarly, David Garrett, who says he "likely will be involved" with Roy Building renovations when they begin, adds that a start date for the project has to be decided, but that Reznick "hopes it will be in the very near future, particularly if the Barrington Street heritage district is approved and the incentives for redevelopment are included in that plan."

Like Barrington's decline, the plan to designate Barrington a historic district is one of those subjects people have been discussing for ages. "People have been talking about itfor 15 years or more," says Plaskett. "And the conditions have never been quite right to get the level of buy-in that's been needed."

The "financial incentive" part of the four-part Barrington Street Historic District plan was approved in principle by council last month. The plan, now tied in with the overarching HRM by Design downtown plan, is currently the subject of public consultation and could be adopted by council as early as July. It's the closest that all the talk about a historic district has come to being made concrete, and both Plaskett and MacKinnon are optimistic the plan will go through.

If it does, the renewed private and public reinvestment in Barrington that follows should go a long way toward quieting pesky concerns about the street being in trouble. Projects long in stasis, such as the old NFB site's redevelopment, will finally start happening. The former NFB building was struck by fire in 1991 and its front was restored by the former city of Halifax in 1997, but its interior has remained untouched since. Chris Tzaneteas, one of the property's owners, says he and co-owner Costa Elles plan to turn the property into a "mixed commercial and residential" development. They're just waiting to see what kind of grants and tax credits will be available to help finance the costly refurbishment.

The general consensus among Barrington shopowners is that municipal investment in the street is long overdue. The street's not living up to its potential and most say dedicated municipal or provincial interest in the street would improve the situation. "Tonnes of people have tonnes of great ideas. Maybe the city should listen to us, instead of wasting all their time thinking about cats," says Dunsworth.

Saul says: "We have a lot of representation from council outside of the city core---and I don't think they understand the needs of the downtown." And the notion that the street has experienced some decline in the last year isn't entirely an illusion. Dunsworth cites a recent drop in business at Junk & Foibles as a major reason her family decided to close the Barrington mainstay (the Freemasons' building was also sold). John Doull, owner of used-book treasure-trove John W. Doull Bookseller, a much-loved store on the street, says his own business has been dropping steadily since the year 2000. "I can't say I've seen it worse," says Doull, about the street's current condition, adding, "If people still want to have this kind of business here, they have to support it."

That said, many think the street is in a better position than it has been in the past. "Well, you know, it's funny: When we moved into Barrington Street it was empty," says Shelley Taylor, owner of Venus Envy, who moved her store to the street from Inglisnine years ago. "And so, what I've seen is a real improvement of Barrington Street." She, too, cites Attica's move and the presence of Freak Lunchbox as factors improving the street's health.

What remains to be seen is whether the street's relative prosperity will continue; whether Barrington will attract and court more of the unique businesses that appear to have kept it afloat; whether all the high-minded plans for the street will at last stop being theoretical pipedreams; whetherwe'll ever see that skating rink built inGrand Parade.

Sure, talking about reviving Barrington is inspiring. But wouldn't it be fun to finallydo it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 7:53 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I think there's some truth to the talk of the street being in limbo because some renovation incentives may be created sometime soon. Incentives would be great but they need to be fast-tracked: there's no excuse for them taking this long.

I guess ultimately the problem is that HRM council generally doesn't care about the downtown, but it's frustrating how in a way their half-hearted attempts to appear to be doing something actually worsen the situation by adding uncertainty to the equation. Ironically, the street would probably be more active today if there were no talk of heritage incentives or HRM by Design and developers had to just go forward with their own funding.

For Barrington to really become a good street tons of things need to happen and many problems need to be addressed:

-the hole at George Street must be filled with something
-the Roy Building needs to be overhauled and needs a ground floor tenant
-the NFB building needs to be somehow fixed
-the Green Lantern building is in rough shape
-the former Eaton's building needs a retail tenant, not office on the ground floor
-the street needs general improvements to the pavement, lighting, bus stops, and street furniture.
-the Grand Parade needs serious work.
-the Maritime Centre's ground floor needs some kind of work
-the whole Northern end of the street is a mess.
-a bunch of other buildings need (at least) cosmetic work.
-fundamentally there's the issue that about 15,000 more people should live within about a 15 minute walk.

Pretty sad for what's really just a stretch of 5 or 6 blocks...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 1:13 PM
Haliguy's Avatar
Haliguy Haliguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I think there's some truth to the talk of the street being in limbo because some renovation incentives may be created sometime soon. Incentives would be great but they need to be fast-tracked: there's no excuse for them taking this long.

I guess ultimately the problem is that HRM council generally doesn't care about the downtown, but it's frustrating how in a way their half-hearted attempts to appear to be doing something actually worsen the situation by adding uncertainty to the equation. Ironically, the street would probably be more active today if there were no talk of heritage incentives or HRM by Design and developers had to just go forward with their own funding.

For Barrington to really become a good street tons of things need to happen and many problems need to be addressed:

-the hole at George Street must be filled with something
-the Roy Building needs to be overhauled and needs a ground floor tenant
-the NFB building needs to be somehow fixed
-the Green Lantern building is in rough shape
-the former Eaton's building needs a retail tenant, not office on the ground floor
-the street needs general improvements to the pavement, lighting, bus stops, and street furniture.
-the Grand Parade needs serious work.
-the Maritime Centre's ground floor needs some kind of work
-the whole Northern end of the street is a mess.
-a bunch of other buildings need (at least) cosmetic work.
-fundamentally there's the issue that about 15,000 more people should live within about a 15 minute walk.

Pretty sad for what's really just a stretch of 5 or 6 blocks...

At the HRM BY Design open house the other night they did mention there is going to be 6 million allocated towards street scape improvements for both Barrington and Spring Garden Rd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 4:37 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haliguy View Post
At the HRM BY Design open house the other night they did mention there is going to be 6 million allocated towards street scape improvements for both Barrington and Spring Garden Rd.
Unfortunately that is like putting lipstick on a pig.

The street is suffering from a lot of things as someone123 pointed out and those won't help, any more than similar things did in the 1980s.

I drove along that stretch of Barrington today and tried looking at the buildings less critically. I failed. A lot of those buildings that are deemed historic simply are not very good buildings, and the one that came along later are in many cases even worse. From street level you tend not to see the upper floors and the street level facades are in many cases simply awful. I do not have much hope that the things laid out for it in HBD will do any good and the street will remain largely dead. You need to give developers some flexibility to do something with those buildings other than simply expect them to restore them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 4:38 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Haliguy, what was the feeling at the open house the other night? I have not seen any press reports on public reaction there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 6:06 PM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
You need to give developers some flexibility to do something with those buildings other than simply expect them to restore them.
Isn't the lack of rules partly what created the ugly street level facades in the first place? People take historic buildings and slap corrugated metal on them or paint them neon purple. The street level of most of the buildings on Barrington is just horrible. You can have awesome, modern, renovated, well-maintained and financially successful historic buildings that maintain their facades. There is no need to do anything radical at street level. One example off the top of my head would be the Regent Street Apple Store in London. Restore the historic facade, modernize the interior, add a great retailer and bam! Of course, you need people living in the area as well... and I'm all for the idea of building on to historic buildings if need be. But the historic facades should remain historic... otherwise... why are we saving them?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 6:09 PM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
Haliguy, what was the feeling at the open house the other night? I have not seen any press reports on public reaction there.
I was there. There was no feeling. People filed in... looked at the boards... Andy gave his powerpoint... and then everyone left. There was no open mic Q&A. Which is just as well. Those things can get silly. And the Heritage Trust was handing out protest flyers to everyone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 7:08 PM
Haliguy's Avatar
Haliguy Haliguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,298
Yeah thats about it. It was hard to get a feeling of how things went. As Takeo was saying the Heritage Trust were handing out flyers why the HRM by Design is bad for Halifax. I actually went over to their both to see what they were saying and ended up getting in a big argument with them. I should have known better. They seem to have some sort of superiority complex or something and they seem to be delusion in that they think they are in the majority
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 8:17 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeo View Post
Isn't the lack of rules partly what created the ugly street level facades in the first place? People take historic buildings and slap corrugated metal on them or paint them neon purple. The street level of most of the buildings on Barrington is just horrible.
No argument with that last point. I am talking, though, about the extremely restrictive rules being proposed in HBD for Barrington that will limit anything new other than restoration. I continue to say that while some of the buildings on Barrington are of enough merit to justify restoration, others are just old and uninteresting and we would be better off taking them down and replacing them with something better. That will now never happen.

Quote:
You can have awesome, modern, renovated, well-maintained and financially successful historic buildings that maintain their facades. There is no need to do anything radical at street level. One example off the top of my head would be the Regent Street Apple Store in London. Restore the historic facade, modernize the interior, add a great retailer and bam! Of course, you need people living in the area as well... and I'm all for the idea of building on to historic buildings if need be. But the historic facades should remain historic... otherwise... why are we saving them?
If the buildings on Barrington were of that quality and size of course you would be correct. Most are not that big and none are of that level of design. So what we have and will continue to have are a bunch of 3-storey walk-ups that are no more than 25 feet wide that are not big enough to economically justify restoration but that also cannot be built up or out to make them bigger nor ever taken out for replacement. Result: continuation of the dead zone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 8:48 PM
hfx_chris hfx_chris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haliguy View Post
Yeah thats about it. It was hard to get a feeling of how things went. As Takeo was saying the Heritage Trust were handing out flyers why the HRM by Design is bad for Halifax. I actually went over to their both to see what they were saying and ended up getting in a big argument with them. I should have known better. They seem to have some sort of superiority complex or something and they seem to be delusion in that they think they are in the majority
Well then it's time somebody formed a group to visibly oppose these regressive activists at meetings and open houses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 9:05 PM
Haliguy's Avatar
Haliguy Haliguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfx_chris View Post
Well then it's time somebody formed a group to visibly oppose these regressive activists at meetings and open houses.
There is...the Urban Development group with Fusion.

http://www.fusionhalifax.ca/en/home/default.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 9:42 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
The Barrington Street heritage plan doesn't seem very realistic to me. For one thing, they talk about the street in abstract terms as if it is Old Montreal or something when in reality they're only talking about four blocks or so of heritage buildings that are pretty easy to enumerate, which makes it even more sad to think of how long this process has gone on.

I'd prefer to see better criteria for historic buildings that are then used to identify properties that would then be subject to both stronger development restrictions and subsidy.

The blanket approach of trying to recreate the street circa 1950 is really naive with buildings like the Maritime Centre, TD, CIBC, and Scotia Square. Given the mixed scale of the street they should be going for major new buildings, not a 1950s "main street" feel.

As far as the architectural quality of buildings on Barrington goes, one thing to keep in mind is that many of the buildings have had ornamentation removed and are just generally in a terrible condition relative to when they were built. A lot of them can be restored to a state that's not really obvious based on the way they looked when they were at their worst.

Unfortunately the city likes to pat itself on the back for being historic but it's done perhaps the worst job in Canada of preserving what it originally had. The buildings that survive have more to do with the volume of original period buildings than with active heritage preservation. What's left is probably less than half of what existed originally. Even just in recent years there was a 4 storey brick building on Granville that was neglected and then demolished while the Heritage Trust spent its money and time fighting new development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 10:52 PM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
If the buildings on Barrington were of that quality and size of course you would be correct. Most are not that big and none are of that level of design. So what we have and will continue to have are a bunch of 3-storey walk-ups that are no more than 25 feet wide that are not big enough to economically justify restoration but that also cannot be built up or out to make them bigger nor ever taken out for replacement. Result: continuation of the dead zone.
Well... I'd have to agree with you there. Our buildings are not nearly as impressive as what you see on Regent Street. The comparison was not really fair. I was simply trying to illustrate a point. And I believe the plan for the Roy building, which does have alot of frontage, is to restore and modernize and get some great retail in the ground floor. There are some nice buildings that are worth saving and not every building on the street is protected. Although most are. I'd love to see Carsands, CD Plus and the old Theater Entrance blown up first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 11:02 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeo View Post
Well... I'd have to agree with you there. Our buildings are not nearly as impressive as what you see on Regent Street. The comparison was not really fair. I was simply trying to illustrate a point. And I believe the plan for the Roy building, which does have alot of frontage, is to restore and modernize and get some great retail in the ground floor. There are some nice buildings that are worth saving and not every building on the street is protected. Although most are. I'd love to see Carsands, CD Plus and the old Theater Entrance blown up first.

I don't have anything against the Carsand building and wouldn't mind if it stayed. But much of the rest of that block could go away tomorrow and I wouldn't shed a tear. Take Star Anise, Sievert's, the Paramount entrance, and a couple of others adjacent out and replace it with something appropriate and you're off to a good start. Down the street, take the sandwich place on the corner of Prince, and Foreign Affair next to it, knock them both down, and start anew. Take the whole friggin stretch from CD Plus to the NFB including the Khyber (sorry 123) and blow it all up. I love the idea of taking the Zellers building and putting as tall a tower on top as you can. Convince the province to give up the main floor of the Johnston Bldg and open it up to retail.

Damn, that's better than anything HBD has come up with. We ought to have a design competition on here for this...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 11:03 PM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Even just in recent years there was a 4 storey brick building on Granville that was neglected and then demolished while the Heritage Trust spent its money and time fighting new development.
Right... behind the TD Tower. I love how we demolish historic buildings and then put up a fence so we can admire the hole in the ground. Meanwhile, "Heritage" Trust was spending a small fortune trying to stop promising new development on a vacant lot on an ugly run down block where a decrepit parking garage used to stand. You know, I would be all for the Heritage Trust if they actually focused on saving our heritage buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2008, 12:18 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I think part of the problem with the Paramount etc. stretch is that it's under a viewplane. New buildings on the site would have to be somewhat shorter than the MetroPark in behind, which is only maybe the equivalent of 6-7 storeys?

There was once a proposal for a loft building across Blowers from Carsand behind that little corner brick building but it never materialized. The hideous MetroPark and MEC developments didn't really do that block any favours visually.

I'm not particularly attached to the Khyber and NFB, but it seems like a waste to tear them down. It would be interesting to somehow preserve the facades and rebuild them elsewhere in the city. They'd go well on Gottingen if it weren't so bombed-out, for example. CD Plus obviously can go. A nice lowrise building with a roofline similar to the five storey Tramway Building on the corner of Sackville would be great for that stretch.

Barrington is not Regent Street but we shouldn't shortchange it either. The six storey Wright Building from the 1890s is pretty impressive for example - large ground floor windows going up to a second floor, vaulted entrance with metal detailing, interesting upper floors. I suspect the building that had the Mud Room would also be really nice if it were cleaned up. The same thing goes for Zeller's and the Roy Building, again from the 1890s and pretty impressive for its age.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2008, 12:31 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Here's Zeller's and the Keith/Green Lantern Building, which has an attractive facade but needs an overhaul. To the right of course are some buildings that are just not up to par:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2008, 12:58 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
That photo is a good example of Barrington's current problems. I had forgotten that the Green Lantern building had Travelcuts, Pogue Fado and one other forgettable storefronts at street level. While the upper stories of the building have some merit, the street level is very bad and shows absolutely nothing of interest. In that case, it's probably been that way since the 1950s or 60s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2008, 2:25 AM
Takeo Takeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
That photo is a good example of Barrington's current problems. I had forgotten that the Green Lantern building had Travelcuts, Pogue Fado and one other forgettable storefronts at street level. While the upper stories of the building have some merit, the street level is very bad and shows absolutely nothing of interest. In that case, it's probably been that way since the 1950s or 60s.
Exactly. If you look up... you will see some very nice old buildings on Barrington.

Last edited by Takeo; Apr 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2008, 2:34 PM
Haliguy's Avatar
Haliguy Haliguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The Barrington Street heritage plan doesn't seem very realistic to me. For one thing, they talk about the street in abstract terms as if it is Old Montreal or something when in reality they're only talking about four blocks or so of heritage buildings that are pretty easy to enumerate, which makes it even more sad to think of how long this process has gone on.

I'd prefer to see better criteria for historic buildings that are then used to identify properties that would then be subject to both stronger development restrictions and subsidy.

The blanket approach of trying to recreate the street circa 1950 is really naive with buildings like the Maritime Centre, TD, CIBC, and Scotia Square. Given the mixed scale of the street they should be going for major new buildings, not a 1950s "main street" feel.

As far as the architectural quality of buildings on Barrington goes, one thing to keep in mind is that many of the buildings have had ornamentation removed and are just generally in a terrible condition relative to when they were built. A lot of them can be restored to a state that's not really obvious based on the way they looked when they were at their worst.

Unfortunately the city likes to pat itself on the back for being historic but it's done perhaps the worst job in Canada of preserving what it originally had. The buildings that survive have more to do with the volume of original period buildings than with active heritage preservation. What's left is probably less than half of what existed originally. Even just in recent years there was a 4 storey brick building on Granville that was neglected and then demolished while the Heritage Trust spent its money and time fighting new development.

Its funny, when I had that argument with the Heritage Trust folk the other night I told them they weren't doing a very good job protecting heritage buildings and they said that wasn't their job. They said their job was to promote heritage not protect buildings. I just laughed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.