Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyyy
There is nothing inappropriate about this development and residents are well aware that this is zoned R3 and that this day would be coming - especially after the Irving's moved. The only major concern regarding this development is traffic flow via Camelot. The preference would be to not open this into Camelot at all, but rather have traffic flow out to Harrisville. Some may see this as "selfish" however if you have a home in the area you can hardly blame residents for being concerned. With the amount of units to be constructed, it will likely add 3x the vehicle traffic versus what is there today, and this will greatly change the overall feel of the neighbourhood. This is a major issue, especially if you have small children who walk, bike and play within the area. Moncton has a terrible track record at protecting the overall character of its residential areas and they need to do a better job of this.
|
Thanks for your input. It sounds like you live in the neighbourhood.
This is somewhat of an existential question for urban planning professionals (and enthusiasts) - what exactly is the best plan for suburban street networks???
Urban theory suggests the most efficient way for a city to grow is by simply extending the downtown street grid into to suburban hinterland as far as topography will allow. By doing so, you promote walkability, bicycle usage and efficient traffic flow, with vehicles able to travel from point to point directly rather than having to be diverted to collectors even for a short drive within a neighbourhood. This helps to alleviate congestion on the collector routes. A simple grid system also allows for an efficient public transit system to be developed. This all makes perfect sense.
On the other hand, an urban grid road network does raise concerns regarding safety for children in the neighbourhood, and would also make neighbourhoods more noisy and less peaceful. I can appreciate this since I live on a short cul de sac myself, and it's so quiet, its almost like living in the country. As such, I can see both sides of the argument.
Personally, I think the proper course is the middle ground. I
do think there is a place for an interconnected street grid at the neighbourhood level to promote easy traffic flow without burdening the main commuter routes with unnecessary local traffic. At the same time, cul de sacs are not an evil concept, and, as long as they are short, should be able to coexist within an effective grid system.
I also think that traffic calming on the neighbourhood street grid is very important. This can be accomplished by narrowing the streets, allowing on street parking, and allowing gentle curves in the roadway (this promotes driver alertness, and increases visual interest).
I think suburban monoculture is to be abhorred, and that small commercial nodes should exist in every neighbourhood, containing essential services like convenience stores, hairdressers, small professional offices and the like. This would also promote walkability, active transport, and discourage car use. Why does anyone need to hop into a car and drive a couple of km to pick up a litre of milk or some eggs?
There is a middle ground out there.