HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


1000M in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #761  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2017, 2:58 AM
Domer2019 Domer2019 is offline
Biased in a good way?
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockfordSoxFan View Post
I can't pinpoint what they did to make this a more cohesive looking building, but that model looks fantastic.
I feel like how backlit the model is and perhaps not being true to the final materials affect the presentation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #762  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 12:19 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,132
The rectangular to oval transition needs to align with either neighboring building roof. That would help eliminate the jaringness of it. It just looks random the way it is.
What if needs is to extend the bottom section 5-6 stories and give the two story balcony a view north. Change the cantaliever slope to match.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #763  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 1:49 AM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
The rectangular to oval transition needs to align with either neighboring building roof. That would help eliminate the jaringness of it. It just looks random the way it is.
What if needs is to extend the bottom section 5-6 stories and give the two story balcony a view north. Change the cantaliever slope to match.
Context isn't the issue. The issue is two pieces that don't match or complement each other. The contrast between angular and rounded forms looks arbitrary. The two strong vertical elements on the base that end at the transition don't help either. The only continuity is the horizontal banding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #764  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 4:03 AM
donnie's Avatar
donnie donnie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc5680 View Post
Context isn't the issue. The issue is two pieces that don't match or complement each other. The contrast between angular and rounded forms looks arbitrary. The two strong vertical elements on the base that end at the transition don't help either. The only continuity is the horizontal banding.
I agree, round out the base or square out the rest of the 80%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #765  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 12:58 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,132
I agree it'd be best if there was no form transition at all. But if there is going to be one, it'd look better if it was contextual.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #766  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 1:22 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
some of the vertical lines are more pronounced including the one toward the middle that runs all the way up
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #767  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 3:12 PM
Khantilever Khantilever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 314
Model looks great! But I wonder how much of that is just because the setback is less pronounced from an elevated vantage point. The absence of those ugly green screens or trees on the deck in the earlier renders helps too.

Anyway, the design is growing on me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #768  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 8:58 PM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,553
It's growing on me. The model is very nice. The curves will look great in the sun.
__________________
If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth. -Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #769  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 12:39 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,571
The border between the boxy cantilevered base and the curvy tower above seems less harsh when looking at the model, as compared to the renderings. Hopefully it turns out looking like that once its built.

Otherwise, I will third the sentiment that the towers design is growing on me. Probably due to familiarity, since I see a rendering of it several times a week while browsing SSP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #770  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 3:56 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by intrepidDesign View Post
Because a vast majority of us believe that the life and soul of our city depends on variety, both socially and socioeconomically. Homogeny is the anthills of a thriving city. You hate this socialist crap, well guess, what, I love it and feel there needs to be a whole shit load more of it. Lucky for all of us, the city is well inoculated to a short-sighted, privilege grudge, mentality like yours. Keep that crap in the meth belt thank you.
There is LOTS of affordable housing in Chicago.

Presumably the affordable units are rental units and not condo units, though. The latter would make no sense.

And I also think that this looks like two different buildings. I like the cantilevered concept, and don't think the base should be curved, but if the top is then there needs to be a better transition. Perhaps leaving the east and north facades boxy and having the south (in a gradual transition) and west facades curve.
__________________
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." - Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #771  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 5:43 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
This Forbes article had another rendering which I don't think we have seen yet:

Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #772  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 6:15 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
From the article:
Quote:
"Construction for 1000M is slated to begin in late 2018 with a target completion date of 2021"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #773  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 6:37 PM
Bonsai Tree's Avatar
Bonsai Tree Bonsai Tree is offline
Small but Mighty
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 343
I saw a commercial for 1000M last night. I knew they were marketing really hard, but commercials? Really? I don't even think Vista had commercials.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #774  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 6:56 PM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Late 2018? I had thought it was supposed to start in early 2018. This project feels like it will never start...
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #775  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 8:20 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,571
Hopefully it wont miss out on the current real estate market cycle...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #776  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 9:29 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is offline
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hinsdale / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
I saw a commercial for 1000M last night. I knew they were marketing really hard, but commercials? Really? I don't even think Vista had commercials.
The wanda vista doesn't need a commercial for how big it is. 1000 S Michigan is not really on the average person's radar so they need to get the word out.
__________________
1. 9 DeKalb Ave - Brooklyn, NYC - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. American Radiator Building - New York City - Hood, Godley, and Fouilhoux - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #777  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 9:39 PM
Domer2019 Domer2019 is offline
Biased in a good way?
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 264
And to think they were originally trying to fill 1000' worth of units. I'd like to think tepid sales are because of the awkward design, but probably not...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #778  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 9:42 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domer2019 View Post
And to think they were originally trying to fill 1000' worth of units. I'd like to think tepid sales are because of the awkward design, but probably not...
Your average condo buyer isn't going to care all that much about the building's exterior appearance. Their priorities are a well designed unit, that the lobby and public spaces look nice, the location works for them, and that they feel that they get a good bang for their buck. As long as the exterior isn't outrageously ugly, its more of an afterthought. Clearly, those of us on this site would probably rank architectural merit a bit higher on our list.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #779  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 9:53 PM
Domer2019 Domer2019 is offline
Biased in a good way?
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
Your average condo buyer isn't going to care all that much about the building's exterior appearance. Their priorities are a well designed unit, that the lobby and public spaces look nice, the location works for them, and that they feel that they get a good bang for their buck. As long as the exterior isn't outrageously ugly, its more of an afterthought. Clearly, those of us on this site would probably rank architectural merit a bit higher on our list.
I think all of this really just speaks to the difference between LSE and the South Loop, despite its hype.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #780  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 9:55 PM
TimeAgain TimeAgain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire View Post
Late 2018? I had thought it was supposed to start in early 2018. This project feels like it will never start...
The last predictions before this had it at late 2018 start.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.