HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 7:49 PM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
THIS is how you get truly affordable market-rate housing in an expensive city

How do you get truly affordable market-rate housing in an expensive city, without subsidy? Micros! I mean real ones, like 70-200 sf, often with kitchen and sometimes even bathroom down the hall.

In other words, like the SROs of yesteryear, or the dorms and small hotel rooms of today.

Seattle is days away from finally allowing micros down to 70 sf, pending the mayor's signature on what the council passed unanimously on Tuesday. This follows state legislation where any apartment zone that allows apartments of six+ units must also allow congregate housing like I describe (the 70 sf figure is because any bedroom has to be at least that size) and count each bedroom as 1/4 of a unit in density calculations. Other cities will follow statewide.

What do other cities allow? Similar? I assume at least college dorms are allowed to be tiny, but what about units in private developments?

We allowed similar units in a brief period a decade ago via a loophole that saw each "cluster" as one unit. Before the loophole was closed we got 3,600 units in short order, often under the "Apodment" brand. These filled up quickly, yet today Apodments start around $800 with sizes down to 103 sf.

Lately, the smallest Seattle allows is 220 sf (SEDUs, or small efficiency dwelling units), but even that is more often 280+ sf due to the required multiple sinks and the geometries involved. We get tons of those and they're somewhat affordable but cost hundreds more.

Puget Sound Business Journal
Apodment
Legislation as passed Council
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 7:57 PM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
Let me add a few points.

A 100 sf bedroom in a congregate building isn't for everyone. But how many people would rather have that than two roommates, mom's basement, a 90-minute commute with a car they can't afford, or a homeless shelter?

Typically it's singles too of course.

Also consider that in a great city (not that Seattle is great yet), much of the street life is due to the neighborhood being part of your home, so you don't have to have your own copy of everything. This is why Paris has a coffee shop culture for a notable example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 8:24 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39,234
What's to stop these things from turning into the SRO's of the past? The rents are just low enough for the riff-raff to be able to afford them which could eventually turn off their target market (upwardly mobile GenZ'ers) from wanting to live there. It's one thing to live in a sketchy apartment building but you don't have to share bathroom and kitchen areas with your neighbors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 9:20 PM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
The main issue with old SROs was that they weren't up to modern fire codes. These are.

I'm sure shared kitchens can get messy, but if you wash the shared stuff before using it or keep a few items of your own (plate/silverware/pan) you'll be fine. Roommates in a normal apartment wouldn't be much different except here the bedroom locks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2024, 9:33 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,185
Portland has a few buildings like this. I dunno, 200 sq ft is probably my bare minimum. Ive got a psycho cat and collection of bikes so that'll be my retirement pad. Id be more excited if these could be garden cottages or little apartments like that.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 12:43 AM
Wigs's Avatar
Wigs Wigs is online now
Great White Norf
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 12,128
In the future Robot Arms apartments will satisfy all humanoid needs.

I'm sorry I can't take 70sqft seriously. You should have to live in one for a year for making that suggestion

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 12:53 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,492
^ Yeah, 70 SF (8'x9') is a little too close to a prison cell for my sensibilities.

I guess it's better than sleeping on the street, but maybe our society needs to reorder itself a bit if a person who puts in a solid 40 hours of work a week (doing whatever) can only obtain 70 SF to call their own.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Sep 27, 2024 at 1:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 1:54 AM
lio45 lio45 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 43,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
The main issue with old SROs was that they weren't up to modern fire codes. These are.

I'm sure shared kitchens can get messy, but if you wash the shared stuff before using it or keep a few items of your own (plate/silverware/pan) you'll be fine. Roommates in a normal apartment wouldn't be much different except here the bedroom locks.
Good SROs don’t have shared kitchens. Each room has running water and a sink, a fridge-freezer (at least a small one), and means of cooking (at least a 2-burner “hot plate”). The only shared things are bathrooms (toilets + showers) and the laundry area. Tenants’ dirty dishes do not impact anyone else :p

The idea of SRO isn’t the same as roommates in an apartment that was not designed for roommates. The “units” in a SRO building are more autonomous than that.
__________________
Suburbia is the worst capital sin / La soberbia es considerado el original y más serio de los pecados capitales
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 2:34 AM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
70 sf is only the law, not necessarily what gets built. In any case, why shouldn't people have even cheaper options? If they can't afford 100 sf, they deserve an underpass? (My guess is that size isn't common though I don't have stats.)

SROs came in a variety of sizes and types, some without plumbing. For example the Blues Brothers and Coming to America had SRO units without bathrooms or kitchens. Maybe kitchens were rare...the assumption might have been that residents would eat the landlord's food (at rooming houses) or the greasy spoons often associated with cheap apartments in older pop culture.

Dorm rooms down to 100 sf have historically houses TWO students, with bathroom down the hall and often no kitchen at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 2:38 AM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39,234
The shared bathroom though.

Waiting to take a shower but Bob in unit 5 down the hall ate street tacos and Voodoo donuts last night after a night out drinking Jell-O shots, Dos Equis and White Claws has been turning the bathroom into a level 3 biohazard for the past 25 minutes. Hard pass....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 2:39 AM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
Chat GPT says SROs of the early 1900s typically did not have bathrooms or kitchens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 2:51 AM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,629
I think there's a high correlation between the disappearance of SROs and homelessness in our core cities. I'm all for them.

I can make nearly any space work...I'm pretty creative...but to me an ideal space would be an L shaped situation where even it it was one room, it would create the sense of two different spaces. You could tuck your bed in one zone and your living space in another. Add a private bathroom and a very small built in kitchenette with a small refrigerator, sink, and microwave, and I'd be quite content.


Cooking proper meals could be done in a shared kitchen. You could probably do this comfortably in about 240 square feet per room.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 2:52 AM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
PS, most micros will include bathrooms of their own. The brand I linked says they all have bathrooms and kitchenettes.

I've stayed in hotels and hostels like this, though not for very long. Some had bathrooms down the hall, and others were just tiny rooms or bunks in shared rooms. One was four months but it was over 200 sf.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 3:14 AM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39,234
I think these things would work for someone starting out in a new city and don't have a lot of possessions and will spend most of their time away from home; a doctor working on their internship and residency but can't see how this setting would be ideal for more than a year. I stayed in an ADU in the Bay Area that was around 250 s/f and I started to get squirrely after a few months and spent most of my free time out and about exploring the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 3:16 AM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
Here's a plan set for a building in early 2014 when our loopholes existed. It has 49 units on six floors (183-215 sf, not counting the lofts on the top floor(s)), three kitchens, two stairs, and no elevator. No parking but these never have any. The kitchenette has the one sink, not the bathroom, except in the larger units.

I suspect the solution in 2024+ will be similar, though I don't know the rules for elevators.

https://web.seattle.gov/dpd/edms/GetDocument?id=2014758
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 3:21 AM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39,234
^ "sleeping unit" sounds so dystopian.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 3:27 AM
TWAK's Avatar
TWAK TWAK is online now
Resu Deretsiger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: unincorporated Lake County, CA
Posts: 16,034
Truly affordable? Manufactured homes.
Are those allowed in cities?
__________________
#RuralUrbanist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 3:37 AM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,100
Land and hookups mean those would be expensive in an expensive city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 7:54 PM
dchan's Avatar
dchan dchan is offline
No grabbing my banana!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 10021
Posts: 2,847
As we can see from the posts here, even an urban-leaning online forum is decided American (or Canadian) in sensibility. That is, the living area becomes the "everything space" for the occupant.
__________________
I take the high road because it's the only route on my GPS nowadays. #selfsatisfied
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2024, 8:25 PM
Wigs's Avatar
Wigs Wigs is online now
Great White Norf
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 12,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post

Dorm rooms down to 100 sf have historically houses TWO students, with bathroom down the hall and often no kitchen at all.
That's not what they typically build anymore, since the past 25 years in most of North America anyway. Dorms now are typically 2-4 bedroom units with 1 bathroom and a kitchen area.

You're no longer sharing a bathroom/shower area with the entire floor. And have an actual fridge and stove.

My point: many college/uni students aren't living like students of yore, and this is on campus housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:13 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.