HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #43201  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2018, 5:08 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,204
If the MCC ever closes, we can do this to it
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43202  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 4:37 PM
SteelMonkey SteelMonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 345
Looks like they are trying 1 more time

https://blockclubchicago.org/2018/10...ag-mile-again/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43203  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 4:42 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
boo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43204  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 6:37 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelMonkey View Post
Looks like they are trying 1 more time

https://blockclubchicago.org/2018/10...ag-mile-again/
Under no circumstance should these buildings be demolished until (at the very least) all approvals are granted and funding is secured to build whatever is to replace them. And that whatever has to be something goddamn fucking amazing for it to be worth the loss.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43205  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 7:24 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle View Post
Under no circumstance should these buildings be demolished until (at the very least) all approvals are granted and funding is secured to build whatever is to replace them. And that whatever has to be something goddamn fucking amazing for it to be worth the loss.
Well, that would be a problem given that gorilla-man Reilly blocked any attempt for a highrise on this lot.

So if we can't built a highrise here, then we may as well landmark the existing structures.

The developers who are planning to demo these buildings are actually being smart--demolish what's here to get a vacant lot. That vacant lot becomes an eyesore which eventually makes highrise development here more palatable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43206  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 8:29 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,293
No highrise should go there. Ever. It’s not like Chicago is running out of land to build towers on. Expand density out of the core and save heritage buildings.

I know some folks may not agree with my opinion, but I don’t think the development potential of ALL property in the core is unlimited. By that I mean most of all orange and red rated buildings should be preserved. Most of these are very large important buildings but just a handful are even older residential structures. I don’t think preservation of those few is unreasonable.

Last edited by Rizzo; Oct 30, 2018 at 8:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43207  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 8:44 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Noooo. it's guys like this that make the whole industry look so unscrupulous. A city attorney should look into their finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43208  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 9:29 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rizzo View Post
No highrise should go there. Ever. It’s not like Chicago is running out of land to build towers on. Expand density out of the core and save heritage buildings.

I know some folks may not agree with my opinion, but I don’t think the development potential of ALL property in the core is unlimited. By that I mean most of all orange and red rated buildings should be preserved. Most of these are very large important buildings but just a handful are even older residential structures. I don’t think preservation of those few is unreasonable.
I think most here would agree with you in particular about the near north side in River North/Streeter/Gold Coast regarding turn of the century low-rise buildings. I know that the River North historic district failed a few years ago and it kind of blows my mind how or why it did.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43209  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 11:02 PM
ChickeNES's Avatar
ChickeNES ChickeNES is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
The developers who are planning to demo these buildings are actually being smart--demolish what's here to get a vacant lot. That vacant lot becomes an eyesore which eventually makes highrise development here more palatable.
Sounds good to me. If enough people bitch at Reilly (or vote him out) maybe something will actually get approved here. I don't find the current buildings all that remarkable, landmarking them just because they are old is asinine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43210  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 11:44 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
How would one go about running for Alderman? Just wondering
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43211  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 1:45 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,900
New zoning application for the renovation and re-establishment of Uptown Theatre. 5800 person total occupancy:

https://chicago.legistar.com/Legisla...vanced&Search=






Quote:
The following signs may be re-established, as shown on the attached Marquee Elevations (2 Sheets), Canopy Elevations, Signage Elevations (2 Sheets), and Signage Area Summary subject to the approval of the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, and the area of such signs shall be excluded for purposes of calculating the total sign area permitted on the Property:

a. The vertical projecting blade sign comprised of individual letters mounted to a steel frame structure, reading "UPTOWN," may be re-established.

b. The single-face rooftop sign comprised of individual letters mounted to a steel frame structure, reading "UPTOWN THEATRE," may be re-established with sponsorship name/logo.

c. The rooftop sign facing west, formerly painted letters mounted to a water tank, may be re-established in the form of individual letters or a sign panel mounted to a steel frame structure, which may be externally illuminated, reading "UPTOWN" or "UPTOWN THEATRE," and including sponsorship name/logo.

d. The projecting marquee, including sponsorship name/logo "sunburst," at the Broadway entrance may be re-established.

e. The projecting marquee, including sponsorship name/logo "sunburst," at the Lawrence entrance may be re-established.

f. The framed signs and transom window signs at the Broadway entrance may be reestablished.

g. The transom window signs and framed signs at the Lawrence entrance may be reestablished.

h. The Magnolia entry canopy, which may include illuminated static signage atop the canopy, and transom window signs.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing

Last edited by marothisu; Oct 31, 2018 at 1:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43212  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 2:35 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,457
Now that's bannana worthy. Really hoping to see that Marquee and sign lit up!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43213  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 2:48 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,495
Sad to see all the terra cotta getting ripped out and replaced with GFRC, especially when replacement terra-cotta pieces are easier to get now than any point since the 1940s. But everything else is awesome, need to get this thing movin!
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43214  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 3:24 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,900
How long is the renovation supposed to take? Of course - huge theater. It's pretty crazy when you compare it to some other stuff not even in Chicago. This thing will have 5800 person occupancy. Radio City Music Hall in NYC is just over 6000 people. Chicago Theater is 3600 people while Auditorium Theater is nearly 3900 people. Dolby Theater in LA (where the Oscars are held) is 3400 people. Microsoft Theater in LA (where the Emmy's are held) is 7100 people. Shrine Auditorium in LA which has held the Grammys, American Music Awards, and the ending scene to the newest A Star is Born is 6300 people.

So basically this thing in size is going to rival Radio City Music Hall in NYC and Shrine Auditorium in LA in terms of size. Think about that for a minute. Very curious as to the type of programming they're going to get for this. Of course, Aragon is big too at 5000 people.

Uptown Theater - 5800 people
Aragon - 5000 people
Riviera - 2500 people

A little south:
Metro - 1100 people
The Vic - 1000 people
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43215  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 3:30 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rizzo View Post
No highrise should go there. Ever. It’s not like Chicago is running out of land to build towers on. Expand density out of the core and save heritage buildings.

I know some folks may not agree with my opinion, but I don’t think the development potential of ALL property in the core is unlimited. By that I mean most of all orange and red rated buildings should be preserved. Most of these are very large important buildings but just a handful are even older residential structures. I don’t think preservation of those few is unreasonable.
Fully agreed. We've lost enough of our architectural heritage. Plenty of brownfield sites and abandoned industrial land immediately adjacent to the core to develop on. Immediately designate the few historic lowrises and rowhouses in River North as landmarks so this sort of unscrupulous behavior gets nipped in the bud.

Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
New zoning application for the renovation and re-establishment of Uptown Theatre. 5800 person total occupancy:

https://chicago.legistar.com/Legisla...vanced&Search=

F*ucking yes! Awesome! I want renovation to start ASAP so I can slap myself and prove that this isn't a pipe dream
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43216  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 3:54 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,013
Uptown news
So awesome
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43217  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 3:59 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Uptown news
So awesome
Right around the Lawrence stop will be able to handle up to 3 different concert sets and over 13,000 people on a given night. It's already great for this, but if they pull off renovation, who's taking bets on this area of Uptown gentrifying even more?
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43218  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 4:09 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickeNES View Post
Sounds good to me. If enough people bitch at Reilly (or vote him out) maybe something will actually get approved here. I don't find the current buildings all that remarkable, landmarking them just because they are old is asinine.
They’re part of the historical survey. A limited collection of contributing buildings to Chicago’s architectural identity. How is that asinine?

In more positive news, Happy to hear about the Uptown
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43219  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 12:25 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
How long is the renovation supposed to take? Of course - huge theater. It's pretty crazy when you compare it to some other stuff not even in Chicago. This thing will have 5800 person occupancy. Radio City Music Hall in NYC is just over 6000 people. Chicago Theater is 3600 people while Auditorium Theater is nearly 3900 people. Dolby Theater in LA (where the Oscars are held) is 3400 people. Microsoft Theater in LA (where the Emmy's are held) is 7100 people. Shrine Auditorium in LA which has held the Grammys, American Music Awards, and the ending scene to the newest A Star is Born is 6300 people.

So basically this thing in size is going to rival Radio City Music Hall in NYC and Shrine Auditorium in LA in terms of size. Think about that for a minute. Very curious as to the type of programming they're going to get for this. Of course, Aragon is big too at 5000 people.

Uptown Theater - 5800 people
Aragon - 5000 people
Riviera - 2500 people

A little south:
Metro - 1100 people
The Vic - 1000 people
I'm personally hopeful that the renovated Uptown steals some business from the Aragon which is my very least favorite venue in the city. The acoustics suck, its perpetually one million degrees inside, and exiting is a nightmare. I skip shows I would otherwise go it if that's where they are playing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43220  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 1:14 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Sad to see all the terra cotta getting ripped out and replaced with GFRC, especially when replacement terra-cotta pieces are easier to get now than any point since the 1940s. But everything else is awesome, need to get this thing movin!
Wait is this just as-needed (as in, a piece here and there), or are they taking it all down. I would certainly hope they're preserving what they can....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.