Quote:
Originally Posted by Near North Resident
That's the 70's Loop Historical district
no, not the 1870's, the 1970's
|
Lets not pretend that that 70's loop historical district (as you call it) is not directly across from a prison. I don't know of too many developers willing to take on the challenge of developing a property right next to a prison - especially when there are so many lots available without that massive downside.
Moreover, call it 70's for the sake of argument (although that's questionable as some look a bit older than that), but again, for the sake of argument, we can say 70's. Still, that 1970's development can potentially be very nice with sprucing up. And in large part due to its location it provides VARIETY - again, something that should never be lost on Chicago.
I was just in Miami a few months ago on business. No knock on Miami but everything in its downtown was either new and/or monochromatic. The streetscape bored me to tears. Losing our old stock (1950's, 60', 70's included) should be done with great thought and careful planning - and in some (if not most) instances, avoided entirely.
Of course most everything is contingent on exactly what is proposed to take the place of something... the age/historical significance of what is being replaced... can the historical structure be moved... is a facendectomy (sic) possible... etc, etc.
.