HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2016, 1:51 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
The Docks [3071 Riverside Dr] | Bayview School Site Redevelopment | U/C

3071 Riverside Drive - Former Bayview School

The Ottawa Carleton District School Board (OCDSB) declared the former Bayview School at 3071 Riverside Drive in River Ward as surplus in 2007. On 28 November 2007, Council directed staff to negotiate acquisition and provide Council with a redevelopment plan and funding recommendation. Due diligence of the site revealed underground contamination, and negotiations during the sale of the property resulted in an agreement that the OCDSB would remediate the site. In addition, the City provided $435,000 towards the demolition of the existing school building on the site. The City acquired the 4 hectares (10 ac.) property from the OCDSB for a negotiated purchase price of $8,090,000 in October 2008 (ACS2007-BTS-RPM-0042). The acquisition was in part intended to preserve green space consisting of an existing sports field, with the intent to sell the remainder of the property for mixed density development in support of the objectives of the Official Plan and to offset the acquisition cost for the property. On 9 February 2011, Council approved the acquisition of an adjacent 0.30 hectare (0.64 ac.) parcel of land that would provide improved access to the development area of the site and increase its overall value for resale (ACS2011-CMR-REP-0009). Acquisition of the additional parcel was completed on 15 March 2011 for $475,000.

The overall cost to acquire the two parcels of land and fund the demolition work was $9,000,000.

From the Report to Finance and Economic Development Committee and Council, January 28, 2014
http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/view....s&fileid=99972
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2016, 1:51 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
City seeks interest for development of former Bayview school site
‘I want this done right’: Coun. Brockington

By Erin McCracken
Ottawa South News, Feb 17, 2016


An invitation has been issued to gauge potential interest in a vacant parcel of land where the Bayview Public School once stood.

The city, which owns the property at 3071 Riverside Dr. in the Riverside Park community, is now – through its Ottawa Community Lands Development Corporation – seeking expressions of interest from developers and builders who may have ideas for the future development of the site.

“It’s just an opportunity to see what folks are thinking,” said River Coun. Riley Brockington.

“The corporation, which is at arms-length from the city, (is) charged with the responsibility of, at the end of the day, marketing this property for development (and) is in a very preliminary fashion announcing to the development community that the city is prepared to market, dispose (and) sell this property.”

The request for expressions of interest, issued on Feb. 10, is “a non-binding, non-mandatory initiative,” said Brockington, which is designed to determine what developers may have in mind for the parcel of land, but in keeping with guidelines established by the city with help from local residents.

“It’s still zoned institutional for a school, but (developers) were informed that there was a community concept plan that was developed, that’s been approved by council,” said Brockington.

Residents living in proximity to the vacant lot were invited to submit their wishlists for the site during former River Coun. Maria McRae’s tenure, and then by Brockington after he was elected.

He received 80 submissions from residents last fall.

“We are firm on it’s going to be low and medium density, residential,” he said, adding building heights would be capped at six storeys and the lot is serviceable.

According to the request for interest document, the city first purchased the land from the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board in 2011 with the goal of preserving 0.8 hectares of green space at the site and to either “maintain or replace” the former Bayview school's sports field at the southwest corner of the lot.

The corporation, in its document, also states the site will have to be rezoned from institutional to accommodate future development.

Letting potential interested parties know in advance there is a concept plan in place is important so they are not misled about what can be built there.

“Put all the cards on the table – what are your ideas for this?” Brockington said.

The maximum area to be developed is 4.3 hectares.

The property’s entrance and egress points have also been flagged by the city, and “can or may be” situated off Riverside Drive and Springland Drive, Brockington said.

But that concept plan isn’t set in stone.

“There could be some minor tweaks based on lessening the impact on the neighbouring residents,” he added.

Though there is a limit on maximum building heights under the current zoning, there is a hill on the east side of the property closest to Holy Cross Catholic elementary school. For that reason, staff are looking into different configurations to lessen the impact of building heights and reduce a possible loss of privacy for residents living nearby.

The city’s planning, parks and recreation and real estate staff and Brockington are currently discussing where a park could go on the site.

In the lead-up to a March 10 deadline to submit expressions of interest, parties can request to have a confidential meeting with the development corporation to discuss development options and proposals.

The city plans to issue a request for offers on the property in May, before choosing the preferred offer and then completing a purchase-and-sale agreement by the end of this year, according to the request for interest document.

Construction at the site likely won’t happen before late 2017, Brockington said, adding that rezoning and other approvals from the city are needed first, as well as a public consultation meeting, among other steps.

“I want this done right,” he said. “This will not be rushed.”

To see a copy of the request for expressions of interest, go online to bit.ly/1Xs3dF7.

Erin McCracken is a reporter/photographer with Metroland Media’s Ottawa South News. She can be reached at erin.mccracken@metroland.com.

http://www.ottawacommunitynews.com/n...w-school-site/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2016, 1:53 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Rejigged plan for old Bayview school yard draws criticism

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: November 1, 2016 | Last Updated: November 1, 2016 6:51 PM EDT


Angry residents heckled city bureaucrats Tuesday after a council committee received a revamped concept plan to develop the old Bayview school near Mooney’s Bay.

As real estate director Gordon MacNair explained the city’s rationale to reporters outside the committee room, residents taunted him over the pending redevelopment of 3071 Riverside Dr.

They’re particularly heated over the city’s intention to allow commercial uses in the redevelopment, something that wasn’t mentioned in a 2009 concept plan largely endorsed by the community.

“Gobbledygook,” one man snapped as MacNair walked reporters through the decision process.

The city bought the 10-acre property in 2008 to preserve part of it as green space. Community consultations led to a 2009 concept plan for redevelopment, which included low- and medium-density homes with a soccer pitch and possibly a field house. The city’s Ottawa Community Lands Development Corporation ran a development competition this year and chose an unidentified builder through the procurement process after considering several offers.

When the city released a new concept plan last week, residents were confused. There was now a strip of mixed-use space fronting Riverside Drive and a field house was no longer part of the plan. François Bouchard, owner of The Country Grocer, said “that’s all we heard about” over the weekend.

According to MacNair, staff thought the development proposal was very close to the 2009 concept plan.

Staff removed the field house from the plan in consultation with parks staff, MacNair said. There were questions about how the field house would be funded and if it’s necessary at all.

Instead of a soccer field, the city has changed the green space to a multi-use park.

While the community wasn’t anticipating commercial uses in the redevelopment, MacNair said the medium density residential zones allow “ancillary” commercial uses.



Craig Searle of the Riverside Park Community and Recreation Association asked the finance and economic development committee to defer receiving the new concept plan until residents are consulted.

Searle said a concept plan endorsed by council makes it easier for a developer to make sure the blueprint holds up at the Ontario Municipal Board.

“It’s too murky. There’s no certainty,” Searle said.

City planning staff said the developer will still need to obtain planning approvals, which means there will be public consultation on the formal blueprint and development scheme.

But residents want to chime in now.

Ravi Singh, who has lived in the area since 2014, wants to see the property developed to complement the community with input from residents. The city has “sneakily” come up with a new concept, he said.

“I just want a little more transparency,” Singh said.

River Coun. Riley Brockington sees no hurry in receiving the new concept plan. He wants council to hold off on receiving the sketch until residents have time to send feedback.

However, Brockington doesn’t sit on the finance and economic development committee. He couldn’t convince any of his colleagues to put a motion on the table to defer the development plan, so he intends to make a case at the next council meeting Nov. 9.

jwilling@postmedia.com
twitter.com/JonathanWilling

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...raws-criticism
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2016, 4:06 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,130
Why is there a "buffer"?

Why does everything have to be "buffered" in Ottawa?

Waste of perfectly good land, and why? To "protect" nattering nabobs of NIMBYism from change?
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2016, 4:24 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Why is there a "buffer"?

Why does everything have to be "buffered" in Ottawa?

Waste of perfectly good land, and why? To "protect" nattering nabobs of NIMBYism from change?
I agree. If that "low density" is just more single family homes, there's no need for a buffer behind the existing single family homes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2016, 5:00 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Why is there a "buffer"?
... in particular behind a church and a school!

Maybe so that when those sites come up for redevelopment, there won't be a need for a buffer on their side
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2016, 1:39 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Bayview development spurs creation of advisory team
Retail addition, loss of green space at centre of brainstorming session

By Erin McCracken, Ottawa South News
December 5, 2016




An advisory team is being pulled together to work with River Ward’s councillor and the developer of the vacant Bayview site before concept plans for the site are set in stone.

The group will be made up of Riverside Park residents and members of the Riverside Park Recreation and Community Association, who will be tasked “to try and get what’s best for the community,” Craig Searle, vice-president of the association, said during a community meeting that drew an estimated 90 people to the Riverside Churches on Nov. 30 to discuss changes made to the Bayview concept plan earlier this year.

“Maybe we’ll have an impact of where things go and tweak them,” said Searle, who walked residents through changes made to a community concept plan for the 4.3-hectare parcel on Riverside Drive.

Many residents are upset the plan, which was approved by council in 2009, now makes room for ground-floor retail shops fronting Riverside Drive, that a multi-use park replaces a field house and sports field and that green space has been scaled back.

Carolyn Percy-Searle, who has lived in the area for 32 years, said while it is “a blessing” the density is not higher than six storeys, the addition of a commercial component will bring more traffic.

“I moved to this neighbourhood because of the green space,” she said. “We want our parks protected.

“But to have a strip mall on Riverside Drive is idiotic.” she said, drawing applause. “We don’t need a library. We don’t need stores. We need our green space.”

Tracy Murray said she moved to the neighbourhood 25 years ago largely because of the quiet and green space.

She said the addition of retail will add to the problem of cut-through traffic.

“Something’s got to give,” she said. “When I hear other people talk of having more retail, it’s not something I would want to see.”

Laura Duliner added her voice to the chorus by asking what kind of retail is planned. Those details have yet to be disclosed, but city staff insist there won’t be a strip mall and that R5 zoning includes ancillary or local, small-scale commercial or service use, such as a florist shop, laundromat, newsstand, medical facility, veterinarian clinic and office space.

Considering there are vacancies in the nearby Riverside Mall, Duliner said “I question the appropriateness from a marketing point of view of commercial and retail. I’m also very concerned how the traffic situation comes into play in all this.”

She is also against the impact to the view of Mooney’s Bay.

“The prime view” is the reason why the advisory group will try and have the commercial element located deeper into the property away from the main road, said Searle.

But Heather Parker had a different take.

Citing a provincial policy statement that sets out official plan guidelines, she said the goals of that include a mix of housing and employment in communities to shorten commutes and reduce congestion.

“So we’re trying to get more planning so that people will walk to places instead of having to rely on their cars all the time,” Parker said.

Riverside Park suffers from a lack of retail, which needs to change for current and future generations.

“We’re forcing them to have to buy a car so that they can go to South Keys or whatever to do … really basic shopping because we don’t have these kinds of services in our community,” she said, adding that small shops in Westboro and the Glebe are good examples of a model that would work.

In response to concerns raised, River Coun. Riley Brockington noted that public consultation meetings will be triggered when the developer submits zoning, subdivision and site plan applications.

As well, he said the multi-use park at the site will be developed based on community feedback.

“You need to speak up,” he said.

The councillor said he plans to meet with the developer once he knows who it is, but in the meantime he has been assured the buyer is “keen to meet with us.”

“The intent is to have preliminary discussions with the community,” Brockington said.

Erin McCracken is a reporter/photographer with Metroland Media’s Ottawa South News. She can be reached at erin.mccracken@metroland.com.

http://www.ottawacommunitynews.com/n...advisory-team/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2016, 4:02 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Quote:
“But to have a strip mall on Riverside Drive is idiotic.” she said, drawing applause. “We don’t need a library. We don’t need stores. We need our green space.”


Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
But Heather Parker had a different take.

Citing a provincial policy statement that sets out official plan guidelines, she said the goals of that include a mix of housing and employment in communities to shorten commutes and reduce congestion.

“So we’re trying to get more planning so that people will walk to places instead of having to rely on their cars all the time,” Parker said.

Riverside Park suffers from a lack of retail, which needs to change for current and future generations.

“We’re forcing them to have to buy a car so that they can go to South Keys or whatever to do … really basic shopping because we don’t have these kinds of services in our community,” she said, adding that small shops in Westboro and the Glebe are good examples of a model that would work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2016, 5:43 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,693
Awww boo hoo! If they develop this site Carolyn Percy-Searle will have to walk less than five minutes to the green space at Mooney's Bay park, Vincent Massey Park, Hogs Back park, the massive swath of undeveloped land to the immediate South, or the linear park along the transitway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 21, 2017, 1:35 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Canoe Bay Developments Inc. is proposing to construct a mixed-use development consisting of two (2) low-rise mixed-use buildings along Riverside Drive, twenty-six (26) townhomes, three (3) low-rise buildings with flats, a six (6) storey retirement home, a six (6) storey residential care facility, a 1.50-acre park, and a daycare building. The two mixed-use buildings on Riverside Drive will have three(3) storeys, with approximately 1,800 square metres of ground floor local commercial uses as well as residential uses on the second and third floors. The total number of residential units proposed is 624. The low-rise development is proposed along the outside perimeter of the site with rear yards and the mid-rise development is proposed at the interior of the site in order to enable appropriate transition to existing low-rise residential development.

The majority of the parking to serve the development will be underground, with parking for the local commercial uses and daycare provided at-grade in proximity to commercial entrances. The townhomes and flats will also have access and parking directly from the internal, private streets.

Three (3) accesses are proposed off of Riverside Drive, the most southerly of which will be signalized to control movement into and out of the site and provide safe access to Mooney’s Bay Park across Riverside Drive. The daycare building will have a separate individual access from Springland Road.


Development application:
http://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans/...appId=__AKZGJ1

Project page:
http://canoebay.ca


Site:






Renderings:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2017, 11:03 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Residents hold grudge against city over Mooney's Bay development

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: October 31, 2017 | Last Updated: October 31, 2017 4:40 PM EDT


Residents near Mooney’s Bay are feeling “betrayed” and still holding a grudge against the city for changing a concept plan before selling the old Bayview school to a developer for $16.5 million.

A public meeting scheduled for Wednesday night will let people provide feedback on Canoe Bay Developments’ proposed mixed-use community at 3071 Riverside Dr. before the project application goes through the land-use approval process at planning committee and council.

Canoe Bay wants to build a mix of homes on the 10-acre property, marketing the units to older adults. According to Canoe Bay’s website, there would be 27 townhomes, 36 apartment “flats,” 42 loft-style apartments, 247 units in a six-storey apartment building and 277 suites in a six-storey retirement residence. There would be a park at the south end and commercial tenants along Riverside Drive.

The Ottawa Community Lands Development Corporation (OCLDC) selected Canoe Bay to build on the site.

The city bought the school property in 2008, held community consultations on a development concept plan in 2009 and handed the property over to the arm’s-length OCLDC in 2014 to sell it.

In 2016, the city changed the concept plan to include a commercial component along Riverside Drive, riling the community.



It has been exactly one year since a preliminary concept plan for the property was approved by the finance and economic development committee, before being ratified by council.

Craig Searle, the president of the Riverside Park Community and Recreation Association who lives near the site, said residents feel slighted by the planning process for the property.

“The community is basically still feeling very upset with the process,” Searle said on Tuesday. “They feel unheard and betrayed. We feel we’ve wasted a lot of our time.”

Searle said the community believes the number of units is too high for the size of the property.

“The city is growing and getting more dense as we go, but this isn’t close to an LRT station,” Searle said. “It completely goes against the Riverside Park secondary plan, which says any development in this area should align closely in nature with what’s existing.”

Frank Wilson, who also lives near the site, said the development would only increase the volume of traffic cutting through the community.

Wilson bought his home in 2012 after being wowed by the open land behind the property and view to the Rideau River.

“I’m okay with the fact I’m going to lose that magnificent open space, but it’s what they plan to do with it,” Wilson said.

Coun. Riley Brockington said it’s the most heated planning file in River ward.

Brockington is still disappointed he wasn’t allowed to be part of the discussions at OCLDC because he isn’t one of the council members who sits on the board. He signed a non-disclosure agreement to receive information, but “all I got were bubbles,” he said, referring to circles on a map illustrating components of a then-secret proposal.

“Having been through this now, you can’t exclude the local councillor,” Brockington said.

The public meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. in the main sanctuary of the Riverside United Church at 3191 Riverside Dr. Opponents intend to hold a rally before the meeting begins.

jwilling@postmedia.com
twitter.com/JonathanWilling

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ay-development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2018, 2:32 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
City staff recommend developer's proposal for former Bayview School
Community has long fought proposal, still has some concerns

CBC News
Posted: Feb 17, 2018 4:00 AM ET Last Updated: Feb 17, 2018 4:00 AM ET


City of Ottawa staff are supporting a proposal to build a retirement community on the site of the former Bayview School.

In a report to the planning committee, staff recommended the approval of a mix of low-rise townhomes and a six-storey apartment complex for a total of 623 units.

The city's land development agency — Ottawa Community Lands Development Corporation — sold the four-hectare parcel to Canoe Bay Developments Inc. after a request for proposals was issued.

"We all recognize that progress has to move forward, so we want to be good neighbours [and] in favour of the development," said Craig Searle, president of the Riverside Park Community Association.

"Just not some aspects of the development."

Searle said he is concerned about the impact the development would have on the community of Riverside, particularly the traffic and noise.

"Everybody in the community that I've spoken with are tired of the process, they're disillusioned with the process," he said.

"We feel betrayed, we feel unheard. We've been fighting this fight since 2007."

According to the report, two public meetings were held in 2017, with over 200 residents attending each session.

One of the main sticking points has been the project's proposed density. Currently, at the city, there are no clear parameters around the issue, which Searle believes has made defining the project's sustainability difficult.

"The city does not have a definition of low, medium or high density," he said.

Searle noted that the project looks very different today from what was initially proposed in the concept plan.

However, the councillor for the area said the plan was simply a guide to help shape the proposals and without it, there would have been much larger project proposals brought forward.

"Nothing matched the community-led concept plan by 100 per cent," said River Ward Coun. Riley Brockington.

"There were no exact matches. Every bid received deviated in one way or another. And that's to be expected," he said.

"If there was no concept plan you would probably see submissions that were much more dense and much taller. Absolutely much taller," he said.

Brockington said while he understands the project's density is problematic for many residents, he's not sure where the boundary should be.

"I don't know what the ideal number is," he said. "The height, in my mind, is reasonable, but they have a lot of units in them and I think people are looking at the number and saying that's a lot."

Brockington believes the fact the development caters specifically to seniors alleviates many of the community's concerns about the negative impact of the project.

"They don't have wild parties," he said.

"When you look at statistics about people who live in seniors' residence, they don't drive cars, they're not going to be swamping the streets with traffic," said Brockington.

"They're going to be fairly self-contained."

The developer has also proposed a three-storey strip — one floor of commercial tenants topped with two floors of apartments — along Riverside Drive.

Searle said heightening the building would ruin the existing view of Mooney's Bay, which is central to the community.

"That's one of the best views in the city, overlooking the river," he said.

"It'll block that view."

Brockington agrees and said he would be advocating to remove one of the apartment floors. "I will be absolutely, without hesitation, be moving a motion to, at the very least, chop off one of those floors."

Meanwhile, Searle questions the usefulness of the commercial space given the difficulty other properties in the community have had.

"There is a commercial retail establishment maybe half a kilmometre away, to the north, and it has many unused [lots] now that they can't rent out," he said.

The idea of a commercial space with facilities like a doctor's office, pharmacy and coffee shop has garnered some community support said Brockington.

"The commercial strip on Riverside that was added would allow services that the community would need."

The report by city staff to the planning committee will be presented on February 27.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa...osal-1.4539845
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2020, 6:41 PM
RogueNacho RogueNacho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 267
Digging this thread out from the grave, it looks like things are actually still in the works for this site. As per Councillor Brockington's August 4th newsletter:

Quote:
When is Canoe Bay Starting Construction?
Many residents are wondering about the construction of the Canoe Bay development at 3071 Riverside Drive as the construction was slated to begin in August 2018. I can advise residents that at this time the plan to develop the property is still moving forward. I have been approached about some minor amendments to the site plan, however, no official application has been submitted to the City at this point. As a result, I do not believe we will see shovels in the ground in 2020. Some of the potential amendments include an amendment to the underground parking ramp, reconfiguring some units from 1 bedroom to 2 bedrooms, elimination of some of the square footage of the commercial units along Riverside Drive, and to reconfigure to residential units along the ground floor. The preliminary changes to the units will result in a net decrease of approximately 40 units to the overall development plan.

If an official site plan amendment does come forward, I will share the exact details with local residents in a future e-newsletter.

Outstanding matters still include:

1) Registration of the Site Plan Agreement (post the Letter of Credit, pay legal fees, and pay Design Review & Inspection Fee)
2) Building Permit Issuance (payment of Development Charges)
3) Completion of infrastructure within what will be the ‘common elements’ of the Condo (such as private road network and related infrastructure)
4) City inspection of the ‘common elements’
5) Register the Condominium Agreement once the common elements are constructed and inspected
6) Revise Site Plan if contemplated changes become reality
https://rileybrockington.ca/river-wa...e-4-aout-2020/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2020, 11:31 PM
Glenlivet Ave's Avatar
Glenlivet Ave Glenlivet Ave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 186
Looks like a mix of towns, condos and rental apartments. Some info on their website: https://canoebay.ca/adult-lifestyle-community/


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2020, 11:37 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,866
I wonder if the commercial spaces are going to be freehold or rental? Seems like the common elements arrangements could get a bit complicated, although the developer could have the commercial units subsidize the residential units' monthly fees, which would be a nice enticement for buyers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 2, 2022, 2:28 PM
Dzingle Bells Dzingle Bells is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 158
Taking the new drone for a test flight yesterday.. Anyone know what is going on with this project?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 10:45 PM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 389
Came across an ad that pointed me to their new site
https://www.thedocksmb.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 10:52 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawacurious View Post
Came across an ad that pointed me to their new site
https://www.thedocksmb.ca
New renderings:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2023, 2:01 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,453
Certainly a little more interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2023, 8:08 PM
McKellarDweller's Avatar
McKellarDweller McKellarDweller is offline
inner city
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary/Ottawa
Posts: 479
"The Docks?"
Are they planning to re-route Riverside Drive to the east, and dig a big trench to the bay?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:22 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.