Tait subjects himself to more ridicule
JOHN CHILIBECK
PUBLIC EYE
Published Monday March 3rd, 2008
Appeared on page C1
Saint John city councillor Glen Tait has endured a lot of ridicule, and his latest letter to common council doesn't help one bit.
He wrote it following a debate two weeks ago over the proposed new police headquarters. Tait is a key member of the police-justice steering committee and hell-bent on the construction of a large, low-rise building in the city centre, along with private side development that will knock down some of Saint John's most historic buildings.
In the heat of the debate, Tait promised he had questions for Deputy Mayor Michelle Hooton, the Saint John Arts Centre board of directors and Telegraph-Journal publisher James C. Irving, many of whom favor public consultations before the development goes ahead.
He said he'd submit his queries for tonight's council session.
But guess what? In his submission, Tait says he won't bother asking questions anymore. Instead, he wrote a two-page rant scolding people for holding up the $20-million project. He compares Saint John with Quispamsis, which is about to build a multimillion-dollar sports facility, and Fredericton, with its big plans for a convention centre.
"It appears that the major difference is that no lobbyist groups or individuals with their own agenda, election or re-election ploys, have attempted to delay their visions and priorities with entirely new ones that could stall the process," he wrote.
"Or if they were faced with this, they obviously had the leadership, team spirit and integrity to support identified priorities as being in the best interest of the community, rather than thwart the process with new agendas. They have been consistent in ensuring that their major long-standing priorities will reach fruition in their term, rather than pass them on to a new council to redundantly study, rehash, change, or delete, costing taxpayers additional dollars!"
It's clear from the letter Tait wants the headquarters built as quickly as possible.
But he doesn't explain why his secretive committee decided for everyone that north of Union Street was the best location, nor does he make it clear why critics are costing taxpayers more money. Instead, he seems bent on some vague conspiracy theory.
Public and critical feedback have produced a lot of valuable ideas: some have suggested integrating heritage architecture into the new buildings, while Uptown Saint John has proposed making the footprint of the police HQ smaller, building up rather than flat. People have called for pedestrian-friendly spaces and bike lanes. Some have even had the gall to suggest the headquarters would be more suitable in a dead space like the old Downey Ford property on Crown Street, right beside the throughway. How terrible is that?
The former fire chief has distinguished himself by other noteworthy flashes of arrogance. Early in the mandate, he joined the city's pension board as a council representative, a questionable decision given that he's a retiree with a healthy city pension and there was already a retiree representative on the board. Over the term, the board didn't erase the deficit plaguing the fund, and Saint John taxpayers were forced to shell out an extra $19 million.
Tait and the board then made themselves laughing stocks by trying to sue city councillor John Ferguson, elevating him from pension critic to martyr in many taxpayers' eyes. The board has already lost the first round in court and is trying to appeal, throwing more money down the drain.
Midway through his term, one of Tait's e-mails was leaked. In it, he told fellow council members that he purposely misled a reporter about closed-door discussions and recommend they do the same. Instead of behaving properly, he chose to deceive a reporter, and in so doing, the public.
His latest harangues do little to regain people's respect. How else can one judge his threat that the arts centre move and the Carnegie building, a public institution for more than 100 years, be turned into part of the police headquarters?
His pet project is not turning out exactly the way he wanted it to, so he runs down the motives of people suggesting improvements, and failing that, he threatens them.
If the headquarters is a no go, Tait has only himself and the rest of the police-justice committee to blame for thinking they could do as they jolly well pleased.
John Chilibeck is a Telegraph-Journal reporter. He writes about issues that affect the Saint John region. He can be reached at
chilibeck.john@telegraphjournal.com or by calling 645-3267. His column appears on Monday, Wednesday and Friday.