HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #661  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 1:45 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
back when initial plans were being made for the pearl, at least one canal was proposed. iirc, it would have gone from the willamette at about centennial mills, south around 10th or 11th. i always thought it was a shame they didn't do anything like that. hopefully with this project they'll actually do it. i like this project a lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #662  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 3:48 AM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,696
^^^ I remember seeing renders of the proposed River District Plan in the newspaper in '94, with Tanner Springs being re-surfaced and running down to the waterfront. It looked amazing...and with all the money urban renewal money the Pearl's swimming in now, it seems this could've been possible. (Although I have no idea why they abandoned that plan, maybe nothing to do with money.) Hope the Conway proposals can live up to their original inspiration! Very cool-looking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #663  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 3:39 PM
cab cab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,450
2631 NW Upshur

http://www.worksarchitecture.net/html/project6_6.html Links to pictures


Neighbors balk at ‘brutal’ project
A 6-story mixed-use development that would dwarf its Northwest Portland surroundings draws flak from La Torre residents
DJC
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Thursday, January 17, 2008
BY TYLER GRAF

It was once the most brutal neighborhood in Portland – a dangerous and dodgy enclave near Montgomery Park. But with the crime gone, residents now say a proposed development is the “brutal intrusion.”

Located at 2631 N.W. Upshur St., along a block of two- and three-story buildings, is the proposed site of an as-yet-named, mixed-use condominium complex. Developed by George Hale and designed by Works Partnership Architecture, the six-story, aluminum-sheen building recently garnered recognition from the Portland chapter of the American Institute of Architects.

But residents of the La Torre condominiums, located next door, say the development’s scale, scope and design would be an uncharacteristic intrusion on a neighborhood known for small, low-lying buildings.

“This whole thing makes you wonder what (architecture) school they went to,” said Joan Gratz, a Portland-based Academy Award-winning animator originally schooled in architecture. She owns property in the neighborhood and says the development would block views, create street congestion and tower over the sleepy hillside.

She has long ties to the neighborhood, having worked there in the dangerous days when she was an animator at Vinton Studios, which created the California Raisins and made prominent television programs and commercials. Back then, crime was common, and the streets had a gritty flavor.

In the 1980s, for instance, the neighborhood was known as the most crime-ridden in Portland.

The flavor has changed. But whether that flavor’s sour or spicy depends on whom you ask.

“Things that are different, like this building, always change the flavor of a neighborhood,” Hale, the building’s developer, said.

According to Hale, his building’s modern design, with its reflective-steel exterior and what the AIA calls its “ruptured courtyard prototype,” maintains the edgy history of the location.

The development would rise 65 feet, fill 120,000 square feet and contain about 109 condo units and 64 parking spots. Because the zoning allows for the density proposed by Hale’s development, no city-conducted traffic study took place.

This, too, doesn’t sit well with residents.

“Do we think that people won’t own cars? That’s unrealistic,” said La Torre resident Christine Jerko, who relishes her opportunity to continue mediating and negotiating with the building’s developer to make sure condo owners’ property values aren’t diminished by obstructed views.

It’s a textbook example of the contentious aspects of urban development, as neighbors and developers vie for once-maligned, now-valued property.

Matt Wickstrom, a city planner with the Bureau of Development Services, has worked closely with the concerned residents. The main problem, he says, is the site’s zoning. The development would sit on a site split-zoned for both lighter commercial and denser residential. But Hale hopes to up-zone the entire site, allowing for the maximum 65 feet, which would make it the tallest building in the neighborhood.

“At this stage, for the most part, it’s very difficult to touch on the design aspects (debated),” Wickstrom said.

But if there were a good time to voice concerns, he says, now would be it. The ancient art of mediation is still being practiced, but the public comment period ends on Feb. 4.

Still, La Torre resident Zan Tewksbury, who calls the invasion a “brutal intrusion,” says she and her neighbors haven’t ruled out legal action. A civil rights lawyer by profession, Tewksbury says she’s watchful of her and her fellow neighbors’ best interests and is willing to fight by any means necessary.

“We have a duty to act and preserve the value of the building, and we have serious concerns about the devaluation of our property,” Tewksbury said.

But for the time being, Hale isn’t budging.

“To put something in there that is traditional is almost too safe,” he said, adding neighborhoods that are too safe, that lack edgy qualities, are boring.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #664  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 4:12 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518


Six stories don’t sit well with historic commission

A 65-foot mixed-use development proposed for Northwest Portland has Historic Landmarks Commission uncomfortable
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Thursday, January 17, 2008
BY ALISON RYAN

Six floors and 65 feet wouldn’t stack up to much in downtown Portland or the Pearl District. But in Northwest Portland, where low-rises rule, six floors and 65 feet could nix a proposed housing complex.

“This is a big reason for why this is a historic district, and your building has a responsibility to respond to that,” said Brian Emerick, a member of the Portland Historic Landmarks Commission.

The commission Monday gave design advice for the mixed-use development proposed at Northwest Johnson Street and 19th Avenue. Too tall, commissioners said in a previous advice session.

And earlier this week, the message was the same: Anything above four stories is going to be a tough sell.

“We have some very significant buildings within spitting distance of this building,” Commissioner Harris Matarazzo said.

Among them are National Register spots like the American Apartment Building at Northwest 20th and Johnson and the Whidden & Lewis-designed W.B. Ayer House that sits directly across Northwest 19th Avenue.

Myhre Group Architects’ design, Commissioner Richard Engeman said, “has a clean classicism about it.”

Still, Chairman Art DeMuro’s informal poll of commissioners heard a chorus of “no” and “maybe” on whether the building was approvable at six stories. The commission asked to see more information on precedents for height in the area, including measurements of nearby four- and five-story buildings.

“I think it’s a stretch to say that those four-story buildings are similar in scale,” Emerick said.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...sed-for-Northw
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #665  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 4:13 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518
I read somewhere this week that Richard Singer was giving up plans to build a parking garage at NW 23rd and Irving. Instead he is turning the plot into a surface parking lot. Waaay to go!!!
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #666  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 6:37 PM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
So many bad things i could say about NW portland and its people right now...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #667  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 7:01 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 489
Well don't - because the NIMBYs here are not unlike the NIMBYs in NE, N, SE and SW Portland. Check out the article in today's DJC about development in Irvington - same thing or the attitude on Mississippi for the past year regarding proposed development.

The best one can do to counter those attitudes is become involved in your neighborhood association to present support of proposed development. These people aren't evil, they are just worried.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #668  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 7:05 PM
pdxf pdxf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 193
“This whole thing makes you wonder what (architecture) school they went to,” said Joan Gratz, a Portland-based Academy Award-winning animator originally schooled in architecture. She owns property in the neighborhood and says the development would block views, create street congestion and tower over the sleepy hillside."

It makes me wonder what architecture school she went to! Of course, she is an Academy Award-winning animator, so her opinion should matter more I guess, especially since she took classes in architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #669  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 7:39 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 489
When I read the article I immediately thought "she's an idiot". Works is an amazing firm and someone who worked on the California Raisin campaign 200 years ago - an obviously wants everybody to know it - doesn't have any more validity than any other resident. On the other hand, when I read the developer stating "neighborhoods that lack edgy qualities are boring" I thought, that is equally idiotic. In addition, the article makes the neighborhood sound like inner city Detroit. Gimme a freakin' break.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #670  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 8:43 PM
360Rich 360Rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vantucky
Posts: 256
I really like the rendering, but what do I know, I've never won an Academy Award:



I think we should all contact her, and ask her what architecture school she went to.

Here's her site with her contact info: http://gratzfilm.com/

Last edited by 360Rich; Jan 17, 2008 at 8:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #671  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 4:25 AM
RED_PDXer RED_PDXer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 795
People need to get over infill development. Imagine if this was 1900. Entire cities were the size of downtown Portland. PSU would've been on the edge of the city. Time changes a neighborhood's character. Thankfully, all the changes that take place in the Portland region are guided by a regional plan with foresight. Infill development changes the character of cities, but cities thrive on change. Close-in neighborhoods like Northwest Portland and Irvington need to realize that they are part of a larger region and their proximity demands higher density infill development in order to preserve open space and reduce transportation impacts on the environment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #672  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 5:28 AM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
Pacific Wonderland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bi-Situational, Portland & L.A.
Posts: 4,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxf View Post
It makes me wonder what architecture school she went to! Of course, she is an Academy Award-winning animator, so her opinion should matter more I guess, especially since she took classes in architecture.
Well, I worked in animation, have a (shared) Emmy and went to school for architecture before graduating in planning, and MY OPINION COUNTS FOR 4 OF YOU TURDS.

Hope it gets built
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away"

travel, architecture & photos of the textured world at http://www.pixelmap.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #673  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 6:39 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
wow. this is about a block from my place and it's the first i've heard of it. i think i like it, but these renderings look a little too preliminary to really judge. my wife, WHO HAS AN ARCHITECTURE DEGREE SO HER OPINION IS ESPECIALLY VALID, has some reservations about it. (she saw "metal cladding" and immediately thought of the Industrial Apartments on vaughn, which she calls "pigeon cages".) i think the rendering above isn't very accurate - notice that at this angle the roof of the neighboring building is quite visible, but the proposed building's roof isn't at all, like it's at the wrong angle. probably done to reduce the perception of bulk. on the other hand, at this angle, the steps they took to open up the courtyard and make it more visible aren't visible at all. unfortunately, the kneejerk reaction of the nimbys at la torre is unsurprising.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #674  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 7:25 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
If I were going to try and sell a challenging building to a skeptical neighborhood, that would not be the type of rendering I'd let loose. It looks preliminary to me, too.

Works seems like an extremely promising firm, though, so I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. I'd love to see them do a bunch of buildings on NE MLK, a street that could really use some "give me a spaceship, please" architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #675  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 8:29 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #676  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 5:32 PM
kvalk kvalk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 82
and now the other side of the story...

http://www.portlandspaces.net/blog/t...oject#comments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #677  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 6:01 PM
dkealoha's Avatar
dkealoha dkealoha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Gateway (NE Portland)
Posts: 505
This would be an incredible urban space... I hope they can pull it off!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #678  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 6:05 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518


‘Neo-industrial’ Overton to break ground this spring
Developers, who once hoped to begin in January, want a medical company for an anchor tenant
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Friday, January 18, 2008
BY TYLER GRAF

Long before the Pearl District became the home of high-rise condos, boutique art galleries and multi-hyphenate, fusion cuisine, it was a nondescript industrial area. For the new 62,000-square-foot Overton office-retail, mixed-use complex, developers say they’ll keep that “neo-industrial” look.

“It’s a real edgy, semi-industrial office plaza,” said Maria Duncan, a broker on the project for Melvin Mark Brokerage, adding the building is meant to retain the historical character of the area.

By Design Commission decree, the four-story complex at Northwest 14th Avenue and Overton Street will keep its industrial-looking resolve. In a report to the Design Commission filed over the summer, the city’s Bureau of Development Services recommended the project “have a more industrial feel.” The report stressed that the building cannot feel “residential.”

But the development hasn’t secured tenants yet, says Don Drake, lead broker for Overton. He and his team are in talks with a few medical companies, he says, but nothing is complete.

Along with Drake and Duncan, Nick Ehlen of Melvin Mark is also brokering the project.

The Melvin Mark team and the project’s developers – a conglomerate of Portland and Seattle investors, going by the name Overton Pearl – intend the Overton complex to be the first building in a multi-phase project that will incorporate more buildings in the future.

But this means tenant retention.

“Developers today are looking for anywhere between 25 percent to 50 percent pre-lease activity,” Drake said. Most developers, he says, get anxious if this goal isn’t met.

And this need for pre-lease activity delayed the groundbreaking temporarily, to give Melvin Mark more time to secure tenant commitments. Initially, developers announced a January groundbreaking. The groundbreaking has since been pushed back to an indeterminate time during the spring, between late February and early April.

Mark Denyer, an engineer at MFIA Inc. and the LEED specialist on the project, is aiming at efficient water and energy use in his and architect Steve Fosler’s pursuit of gold certification through the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system.

In getting this certification, one must perform a simulation of the building’s energy consumption for the year, proving the energy features would be more efficient. The development will also take advantage of stormwater-filtering bio swales, and building materials will incorporate salvaged wood products and recycled products.

“The challenge for us now is that all we’re building is just the shell with nothing inside,” Denyer said, adding the development is a core-and-shell building and the developers are constrained by the size of the footprint.

Undeterred, developers expect occupancy to begin during the first quarter of 2009.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...n-January-want
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #679  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 6:05 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by bvpcvm View Post
wow. this is about a block from my place and it's the first i've heard of it. i think i like it, but these renderings look a little too preliminary to really judge. my wife, WHO HAS AN ARCHITECTURE DEGREE SO HER OPINION IS ESPECIALLY VALID, has some reservations about it. (she saw "metal cladding" and immediately thought of the Industrial Apartments on vaughn, which she calls "pigeon cages".)
Hey, I've been in some of those places on Vaugh, and they are NICE pigeon cages. Actually, thats a pretty poor description - they're really cool places to live.

Quote:
Neo-Industrial
So... a throwback to the 80s office/warehouse architecture in the neighborhood? Hmm... not the first design influence I'd choose (can we say no creativity?!)... BUT LEED Gold would be great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #680  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2008, 6:36 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
Montana St Condo development in North Portland


This is just South of the Lombard Fred Meyers against the freeway.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:26 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.