HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #721  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2020, 3:35 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
The cone-zone speed limit on the 400 is back to 100 kph between Major MacKenzie Drive and King Road(?), instead of staying at 80 kph. What gives?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #722  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2020, 12:19 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
The cone-zone speed limit on the 400 is back to 100 kph between Major MacKenzie Drive and King Road(?), instead of staying at 80 kph. What gives?
It was down to 80?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #723  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2020, 12:21 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
It was down to 80?
I think it was 80 for quite some time as soon as we went north of Major McKenzie Drive. I don’t remember. It’s been a while since I went up that way (though surprisingly I went up the 400 twice this weekend).

You can check out my photos with disclaimers on Facebook.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #724  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2020, 12:27 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I think it was 80 for quite some time as soon as we went north of Major McKenzie Drive. I don’t remember. It’s been a while since I went up that way (though surprisingly I went up the 400 twice this weekend).

You can check out my photos with disclaimers on Facebook.
So, I was doing 40 over instead of 20 over?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #725  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2020, 12:32 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
So, I was doing 40 over instead of 20 over?
Unfortunately... yes... That’s why at one point Sergeant Kerry Schmidt had to warn those that went 130+ kph.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #726  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2020, 3:52 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.thes...orkplaces.html

Is highway building (i.e. widening 401 from 4 to 6 lanes, extending 400 and 417) considered essential?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #727  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2020, 4:34 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.thes...orkplaces.html

Is highway building (i.e. widening 401 from 4 to 6 lanes, extending 400 and 417) considered essential?
https://www.680news.com/2020/03/23/c...al-workplaces/

27. Construction projects and services required to ensure safe and reliable operations of critical provincial infrastructure, including transit, transportation, energy and justice sectors beyond the day-to-day maintenance;

So, yes.
The list seems like just about everything is open.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #728  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2020, 10:32 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Okay. Quebec took the opposite approach. Even constructions on new infrastructures are suspended.
Welp, there probably goes my dream of driving on a contiguous QC-A85 in 2025.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #729  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2020, 1:39 AM
wave46 wave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
The cone-zone speed limit on the 400 is back to 100 kph between Major MacKenzie Drive and King Road(?), instead of staying at 80 kph. What gives?
Uh, oops. I didn't notice that on my last trip back and forth.

I feel like going with the flow was safe, even if the flow was doing 110-120, because the cops would have to pull over everybody.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #730  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2020, 2:57 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
https://twitter.com/southsimcoeps/st...079104513?s=21

Wow... 205 kph in a 40-kph zone... That’s something else.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #731  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 6:57 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Random question: Why did MTO number the 2nd (tolled) Durham N-S Link as 418 instead of 457, based on the RR 57 nearby? That RR is quite a major route.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #732  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 9:43 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Random question: Why did MTO number the 2nd (tolled) Durham N-S Link as 418 instead of 457, based on the RR 57 nearby? That RR is quite a major route.
What is the highway going to Peterbourough?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #733  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 9:45 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
what is the highway going to peterbourough?
115
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #734  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 9:52 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
115
My mistake. I thought it was 118.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #735  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 9:56 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
My mistake. I thought it was 118.....
From Bracebridge to Highway 28 somewhere deep in the Haliburton~

I mean, the blub around Bancroft is uncharted area for me.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #736  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 11:26 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,536
Even if 115 was 118, I don't think they would have used 418 for the new toll link, as they would likely want to reduce confusion between the 2 roads, and also I would think they would want to save the 4xx for future naming of an upgraded 115. I don't know whey they specifically chose 418, but 457 doesn't seem to fit in with the current numbering system, and there are just as many 400-series that don't have some relation to another highway nearby as there are that do, from a numbering perspective. Maybe they looked at what was available and thought maybe 408 and 411 might get used elsewhere and that superstition got in the way of 413, so maybe they flipped a coin between 414 and 418.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #737  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 11:38 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Even if 115 was 118, I don't think they would have used 418 for the new toll link, as they would likely want to reduce confusion between the 2 roads, and also I would think they would want to save the 4xx for future naming of an upgraded 115. I don't know whey they specifically chose 418, but 457 doesn't seem to fit in with the current numbering system, and there are just as many 400-series that don't have some relation to another highway nearby as there are that do, from a numbering perspective. Maybe they looked at what was available and thought maybe 408 and 411 might get used elsewhere and that superstition got in the way of 413, so maybe they flipped a coin between 414 and 418.
I've always thought that the new rule is to assume the nearby replaced highway though, like 427 for 27. Obviously for something like 400 for 69 (or 404 for 48 in the future, or even 406 for 140 & 58 if that ever happens), that's because the ship has sailed.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #738  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2020, 11:56 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,536
Is there such a rule though? Where was highway 1 that became 401? I would think it would more correctly be called 402. 403 should more be 405 than 403. 402 crosses 2 but goes nowhere in relation to it. 404? Should 406 be 406, or should have been saved for somewhere near highway 6, like the Hanlon in Guelph and the hopeful expansion to Hamilton. 427 is the highest 400 series commonly used (aside from the supposed 451 number assigned to the QEW for internal government purposes). RR 57 wasn't even a provincial highway, unlike neighbouring 12 and 412. Maybe the rule you are thinking of, if it exists, is as you say, a "replaced" highway. 416, 417 for example, replaced and incorporated parts of 16 and 17.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #739  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2020, 12:03 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Is there such a rule though? Where was highway 1 that became 401? I would think it would more correctly be called 402. 403 should more be 405 than 403. 402 crosses 2 but goes nowhere in relation to it. 404? Should 406 be 406, or should have been saved for somewhere near highway 6, like the Hanlon in Guelph and the hopeful expansion to Hamilton. 427 is the highest 400 series commonly used (aside from the supposed 451 number assigned to the QEW for internal government purposes). RR 57 wasn't even a provincial highway, unlike neighbouring 12 and 412. Maybe the rule you are thinking of, if it exists, is as you say, a "replaced" highway. 416, 417 for example, replaced and incorporated parts of 16 and 17.
I read it from the History of King's Highways... (I think it's managed by sonysnob?)

I think MTO tries to adhere to this rule as much as it can nowadays (though, in that case, 418 is a real anomaly). It's also interesting that for 400 through 409 (aka the ones apparently numbered by the order of construction), we don't have 408. It just seems that, for 410 and onward, MTO does bring in this new rule, i.e. 410 for 10, 412 for 12, 416 for 16, 417 for 17, 420 for 20, 427 for 27.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #740  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2020, 12:24 AM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I read it from the History of King's Highways... (I think it's managed by sonysnob?)

I think MTO tries to adhere to this rule as much as it can nowadays (though, in that case, 418 is a real anomaly). It's also interesting that for 400 through 409 (aka the ones apparently numbered by the order of construction), we don't have 408. It just seems that, for 410 and onward, MTO does bring in this new rule, i.e. 410 for 10, 412 for 12, 416 for 16, 417 for 17, 420 for 20, 427 for 27.
There's no such rule for the numbering of 400-series highways.

For the oldest 400 series highways, they were just numbered sequentially. It wasn't until the 1970s that the practice of numbering 400-series highways based on adjacent highways became common, and it's still not a hard and fast rule.

The former Highway 18 was located in Windsor, obviously nowhere near the recently opened 418, for example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.