On Gladstone, here's part of the reasoning for the name change:
Quote:
Gladstone Avenue is named for the former U.K. prime minister William Ewart Gladstone (1809-1898), who opposed the emancipation of enslaved peoples early in his political career
|
I was aware Gladstone was a British Prime Minister. It's something I found out fairly recently (last year or two). I was not aware he opposed the emancipation of enslaved people.
That said, it's a safe bet that the vast majority of people don't know any of this. I'm also pretty damn confident that is not the reason why we named the street after him in the first place, just like we didn't name half the town and put up statues of Sir John A. for his part on residential schools. Just like most people in history, I'm sure Gladstone's legacy is nuanced.
If we use this as an "excuse" to change the station's name, should this not also be used as justification to change the name of the entire street? Not that I'm advocating for this, but very few people associate the street with Gladstone the man (though now the cat's out of the bag, which could create tension).
Side note: I would love for the City to create a website that lists all street names and gives some history of its namesake, good and bad.