Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH
It is probably worth noting that Buncher has explicitly disclaimed the notion that they would abandon the project entirely if they can't get their exact way on the Produce Terminal. In fact even when the TIF issue blew up, they didn't abandon the project, they just abandoned the TIF.
So personally, I am not so worried about the parking lot scenario. I am worried, however, that the public won't be smart about how it uses its leverage, such that we don't get the best possible project out of Buncher.
|
Good point about the TIF, although that news immediately made me suspect that Buncher would be more tempted to do their project on the cheap.
Might be that Buncher proceeding with their property but abandoning the purchase of the Produce Terminal would be the best outcome. Buncher rejected idea of the "cuts" and insisted on demolishing the western third of the building. If Buncher walks and another developer shows interest, we could be looking at a greater range of redevelopment options, one of which---the one that the Peduto and the city would probably push---would be a complete restoration at the current length.
I cannot fathom that there is no developer who would not be able to do something grand with the Terminal at its original length. I am equally convinced that a plan to provide the necessary access to Buncher's property can be devised.
Wasn't the Terminal the location of the Pittsburgh Public Market prior to its recent relocation to larger quarters? The Terminal space would make a great wholesale market, there is ample space for food "start ups" and such a facility would be a good compliment to the residential/commercial space that Buncher eventually builds.