HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1081  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2020, 1:48 AM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 1,515
MANITOBA COVID-19 UPDATE NOV. 30:
- 343 new
- 16,825 total
- 9,260 active
- 312 dead
- 11 new deaths
- 342 hosp, 43 ICU

- 7,253 recover
- 355,081 tests
- 2,611 YDA
- TP 13.4%


New cases:

Winnipeg - 207
Southern - 53
Northern - 46
Interlake-Eastern - 23
Prairie Mountain - 15

Well the good news is Manitoba is not #1 in terms of per-capita COVID cases. Alberta passed us on the weekend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1082  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2020, 5:33 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
The curve is flattening but TP rates are still crazy high... we have to bring those back down to earth.
Cases and TP are both crazy, but flattened. First step flat, second step slowly down. Hopefully.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1083  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2020, 6:40 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,765


Positive view:
First time since second wave started the province wide two week over two week average is down.
MB R value estimated at 0.89, lowest province in country. (using up to yesterdays data. Estimated by biostatician Ryan Imgrund, Twitter: @imgrund)
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Last edited by cheswick; Dec 3, 2020 at 6:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1084  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 6:44 AM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
Just curious, are there any stats on the rate of re-infection?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1085  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 1:31 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
Just curious, are there any stats on the rate of re-infection?
Roussin was asked this the other day and said there were no known cases of re-infection in MB
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1086  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 2:07 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
Just curious, are there any stats on the rate of re-infection?
There have been like 2 worldwide, and it's not entirely clear whether they were true reinfection or dormant viruses.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1087  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 2:31 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
There have been like 2 worldwide, and it's not entirely clear whether they were true reinfection or dormant viruses.
There were also a handful in Korea that were originally assumed to have been re-infected, but upon closer inspection they simply had dead shells of the virus still floating in their blood, triggering a false positive. But overall, it appears that immunity is similar to SARS (which the virus is closely related to), which is a good thing. Most people with SARS ended up with 10+ year immunity. As with any disease there will always be a very small % who are able to be reinfected due to issues with their own immune response...but it looks like SARS-2-CoV does not reinfect easily.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1088  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:01 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,747
So it looks like if Canada is to be splitting the first shipment of 3m vaccines per percentage of Provincial Population, we should be getting approx 108,000 doses.

I used general rounded numbers. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1...pid=1710000901

1.4m / 38m = 3.6%

3.6% x 3m = 108,0000

Since I'm not great at math I showed my work to those of you who will critique.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1089  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:07 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
So it looks like if Canada is to be splitting the first shipment of 3m vaccines per percentage of Provincial Population, we should be getting approx 108,000 doses.

I used general rounded numbers. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1...pid=1710000901

1.4m / 38m = 3.6%

3.6% x 3m = 108,0000

Since I'm not great at math I showed my work to those of you who will critique.
Although you calculated basackwards from how I would do it, I think your numbers check out.

3 million vaccines equates to ~8% of the national population.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1090  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:10 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,747
I said math is not a strong point for me.....
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1091  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:22 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Does that mean that only 54,000 will be covered in the first round since you need two jabs of the vaccine?

Even if that's the case though, I would imagine that 54,000 would really make a difference as you would capture most of the hospital/PCH workforce and a good number of PCH residents. It could dramatically reduce the daily litany of deaths among the 60+ cohort.

If it's actually 108,000 people being vaccinated then that's fantastic... you could cover off just about all of the people known to be dangerously vulnerable to Covid.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1092  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:27 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,017
I think the initial phase needs to be geared towards the core service providers. You need to first shore up that entire workforce before you move towards high risk groups (seniors and people with other health concerns).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1093  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:53 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,747
Yeah, it's tough to know if that 108,000 is doses (includes 2 doses per person) or is it really half - 54,000 because it needs to be administered twice.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1094  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 3:59 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,788
Does that include first nations population? They will have a certain percentage reserved. Pallister made that clear yesterday.

Otherwise it will be healthcare workers and then probably PCH's.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1095  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 4:31 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Does that include first nations population? They will have a certain percentage reserved. Pallister made that clear yesterday.

Otherwise it will be healthcare workers and then probably PCH's.
Are you rolling your eyes at Indigenous communities receiving higher priority? Considering that outbreaks have been more severe (and less avoidable on reserves due to limited ability get deliveries of food, etc), it makes sense. Priority is going to go to those who are most likely to die/be infected, and to those communities/places that have higher infection rates due to easier spread conditions (such as reserves, communal dwellings/prisons, etc).

Answering the previous question about if these numbers refer to doses or people, I believe it is 6 million doses for Canada in the initial shipment, so 3 million people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1096  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 4:42 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Although you calculated basackwards from how I would do it, I think your numbers check out.

3 million vaccines equates to ~8% of the national population.
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Does that mean that only 54,000 will be covered in the first round since you need two jabs of the vaccine?

Even if that's the case though, I would imagine that 54,000 would really make a difference as you would capture most of the hospital/PCH workforce and a good number of PCH residents. It could dramatically reduce the daily litany of deaths among the 60+ cohort.

If it's actually 108,000 people being vaccinated then that's fantastic... you could cover off just about all of the people known to be dangerously vulnerable to Covid.
Yes, I'm pretty sure the numbers are doses. 2 doses required for complete vaccination.
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1097  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 4:51 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,649
That 108,000 would have such a positive impact on the mortality rate. This is great new.

I do wonder what the delivery schedule will look like. Are those doses provided on a monthly or quarterly delivery schedule and what will the ramp up look like.

I believe Alberta mentioned that it will take until mid-late 2021 until the vaccine is available to most of the population. If you consider most to be just above 50% then we could be looking at an average of 3 million people getting access monthly until halfway through the year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1098  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 5:21 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Festivus View Post
Are you rolling your eyes at Indigenous communities receiving higher priority? Considering that outbreaks have been more severe (and less avoidable on reserves due to limited ability get deliveries of food, etc), it makes sense. Priority is going to go to those who are most likely to die/be infected, and to those communities/places that have higher infection rates due to easier spread conditions (such as reserves, communal dwellings/prisons, etc).

Answering the previous question about if these numbers refer to doses or people, I believe it is 6 million doses for Canada in the initial shipment, so 3 million people.
I'm rolling my eyes at Brian P complaining about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1099  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2020, 10:19 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 1,515
320 new cases, with 13.4% positive case rate in Manitoba.


As bad as it is here, luckily it is not Alberta, where the Government has not locked down bars, casinos, etc. I had a medical emergency for the first time in 5 years on Sunday. Thankfully all tests were negative, and I was treated, and given medication.

I was in the non-COVID ward, but had to go to the hospital further away from me, as the one in Edmonton that is close by is full. There I saw a COVID patient for the first time while waiting for an X-ray, when I walked outside my ward. She could not have been over 30, was in a portable bed, and with a full ventilator. She may have either been Indigenous or Hispanic (i was not sure). 6 health care workers were pushing here bed stretcher, with copious amounts of PPE. It's bad enough to see an elderly COVID victim, but see someone who is younger than me, and relatively healthy looking in appearance, literally scared me.

This shit is serious.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1100  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2020, 3:39 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Does that include first nations population? They will have a certain percentage reserved. Pallister made that clear yesterday.

Otherwise it will be healthcare workers and then probably PCH's.
So more ethnicity based quotas, personally I think seniors should be first priority regardless of ethnicity, followed by those with compromised immunity such as diabetics etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.