HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7961  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 9:09 PM
plutonicpanda plutonicpanda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 623
Please forgive me if this has already been discussed, but I heard the Transbay Terminal is causing the surrounding buildings to sink, any truth to that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7962  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2016, 11:55 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by plutonicpanda View Post
Please forgive me if this has already been discussed, but I heard the Transbay Terminal is causing the surrounding buildings to sink, any truth to that?
Look toward the top of the previous page and back from there. It's only the Millennium Tower that is having an issue and no one is certain if the Transbay Terminal has anything to do with it. The 58-floor, 645' tower's foundations were not drilled into bedrock, even though it's our highest all concrete structure and it was built on bay fill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7963  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 2:41 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,338
The building had already sunk by an unexpectedly large amount before they started digging the hole for the transbay terminal. And since work began on transbay, I'd bet 10 bucks that it's had no effect on the sinking. I'd blame the developers for not anchoring the building to the bedrock, which is what most people seem to be doing (aside from the developers themselves, of course lol). But that makes me wonder...why weren't they required by the city to do so? Maybe I have the wrong impression, but it isn't it pretty much required if you want a skyscraper on landfill to live through a large earthquake?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7964  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 7:20 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by tech12 View Post
The building had already sunk by an unexpectedly large amount before they started digging the hole for the transbay terminal. And since work began on transbay, I'd bet 10 bucks that it's had no effect on the sinking. I'd blame the developers for not anchoring the building to the bedrock, which is what most people seem to be doing (aside from the developers themselves, of course lol). But that makes me wonder...why weren't they required by the city to do so? Maybe I have the wrong impression, but it isn't it pretty much required if you want a skyscraper on landfill to live through a large earthquake?
I'm no expert, but all the structural engineers quoted in the articles I've seen say the building would do fine in an earthquake. All the taller buildings that existed in 1906 (a few were 15-20 stories I believe) survived that big quake, and some are still around. The '89 quake did no damage to high rises either. The Chronicle did a good job with their story on the weekend. They had a map showing the old shoreline, and the foundation types of some of the buildings. Anyone--has the city scheduled another round of hearings yet? Maybe in the next hearing they can call in a panel structural engineers to get their opinions? Can someone provide a link to the Chronicle articles of the last few days, especially the one on Sept. 25 with the map? Thanks!

Last edited by CaliNative; Sep 29, 2016 at 6:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7965  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2016, 10:29 PM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 690
This shot is already slightly dated, taken on September 20. The towers under construction have each gained a few floors since.

San Francisco Skyline by Sharon & Rick, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7966  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2016, 7:10 PM
Justbuildit Justbuildit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 173
Salesforce already putting SF on a whole new level, and it's not even topped out yet! I haven't seen it in person yet, but my God! that photo really gives me an idea of what a beast this tower really is.

Last edited by Justbuildit; Sep 30, 2016 at 8:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7967  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2016, 9:20 PM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is offline
Build Baby Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
Hot off the press, these are from lunch time.

Mexican Museum


Transbay Center






Salesforce Tower


Park Tower


181 Fremont
__________________
San Francisco Projects List ∞ The city that knows how ∞ 2017 ∞ 884,363 ∞ ~2030 ∞ 1,000,000
San Francisco Projects ThreadOakland Projects ThreadOceanwide Center - 275M/901'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7968  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2016, 5:10 AM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 690
The cranes from Nob Hill: 350 Bush, Salesforce, 181 Fremont

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7969  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2016, 7:46 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
crane has gone up at the office building project on Townsend at Sixth:



there is low-level activity at the 100 Hooper site. this was Friday morning...



... and a closer look today shows they've begun scraping up the surface along the southern edge. looking east



angling a bit more toward north



1 Henry Adams



looking north up Eighth at 855 Brannan



the Brannan side



Indiana St in Dogpatch, where the southern of the two projects, in the distance, is becoming more visible



skyline from freeway approach between Dogpatch and Potrero Hill


Last edited by timbad; Oct 2, 2016 at 8:12 PM. Reason: corrected auto-correct
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7970  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 4:12 AM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 690
Middle Harbor Shoreline Park, October 1, 2016

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7971  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 7:16 AM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 363
Anyone know why E.C. is purple tonight?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7972  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 7:40 AM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,071
^^^I needed to make a detour around the Castro and Market area today due to a Castro Street Fair. Perhaps there is a connection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7973  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 10:26 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
CPMC, the 'back' side on Franklin:



and the south side:



the medical office building hole across Van Ness. hard to get a good shot of how deep this thing is



Market and Sanchez



the step-down portion along Sanchez







this is from somewhere near Diamond Heights, but I'm not exactly sure where I was:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7974  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 2:41 PM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 690
Some of the usual skyline viewing spots uploaded to Flickr this weekend

West Oakland:

Iconic skyline by G MacFly, on Flickr

Treasure Island:

SURROUNDED by Umberto Federico, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7975  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 3:15 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 706
Quote:
Originally Posted by edwards View Post
Anyone know why E.C. is purple tonight?
My guess is Breast Cancer Month.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7976  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 3:50 PM
emanon emanon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
The Sacramento Bee is a good paper. They were the first to uncover the CalTrans New Bay Bridge design & construction flaws.
Not to discount the staff of the Bee, but the article is from the New York Times. Check out the byline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7977  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2016, 7:10 PM
brantw's Avatar
brantw brantw is offline
Get me out of here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 300
10/3/16

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7978  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2016, 9:16 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Mini drilling equipment on Mission Street beside the Millennium Tower

From the beginning of the north sidewalk by the tower all the way around to the end of the west driveway, the settling is quite pronounced.

[IMG]Investigating the Leaning Tower by viewguysf, on Flickr[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7979  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2016, 3:08 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
Red & Blue Lights

Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
My guess is Breast Cancer Month.
Last night I saw another high rise with red lights on the edge of the roof. Maybe a nod to the upcoming elections.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7980  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2016, 8:38 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry of San Fran View Post
Last night I saw another high rise with red lights on the edge of the roof. Maybe a nod to the upcoming elections.
It's orange for the Giants, just like City Hall. Go Giants!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.