HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1041  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2009, 7:03 AM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonoran_Dweller View Post
Birthday celebration?? How old is The Old Pueblo turning?

Also does anyone know when UA is back in session?
Officially, Tucson is 234 years old, dating from the establishment of Presidio San Agustin by the Spanish on Aug. 20, 1775. However, San Xavier Mission, 10 miles south of downtown, was founded in 1699, and archeological ruins excavated near the Santa Cruz River date from nearly 4,000 years ago.

And I believe classes at the UofA begin next Monday...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1042  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 3:45 AM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
The problematic Biosphere 2 was built by billionaire Ed Bass in the late 80's for $150M on 3 acres of a 1,650-acre spread north of Catalina. Although the property was bought by CDO Ranching and Development in 2007 for luxury homes, the main campus is now leased to UofA for climate change research:




UA researchers plan to alter the ocean biome to resemble the Gulf of California.
(photos: CDO Ranching and Development)



Whole New World
The UA is turning Biosphere 2 into a climate-change laboratory

by Jim Nintzel
Tucson Weekly
August 20, 2009

As director of external affairs for Biosphere 2, Hassan Hijazi sometimes finds himself fielding phone calls from Hollywood producers who want to know if the giant terrarium is available for reality-TV shows. He politely lets them know that the Biosphere is more interested in working with the Discovery Channel these days. "We want to do serious science at the Biosphere," Hijazi says.

That hasn't always been the case. The Biosphere 2 has, in the words of UA College of Science Dean Joaquin Ruiz, "a complicated history." When it was first under construction in the late 1980s on Oracle Road/Highway 77 north of the tiny community of Catalina, the gleaming glass building—which covers roughly 3.14 acres and rises 91 feet from the ground—was designed to be sealed up for a century, with small crews rotating in and out every two years. It included different "biomes"—a tropical rainforest, a grassland savannah, a mangrove wetland, a desert, a small saltwater ocean and beach, and a farm where Biospherians were to grow their food—along with compact crew quarters and a mission-control center that bore some resemblance to the starship Enterprise. The first jump-suited crew entered the building in 1991, with considerable media fanfare and the suggestion that this could be the first step toward developing outposts on other planets.

But many scientists were skeptical of Biosphere 2, and the mission came to a premature end shortly after the second crew entered the facility in 1994. Billionaire Ed Bass, a Texas oilman whose fortune paid for most of the Biosphere's $150 million construction cost, pulled the plug on the management and eventually turned over control to Columbia University, which ran it until the college abandoned the project in 2003. Today, Biosphere 2 and the 1,650 acres that surround it are owned by CDO Ranching and Development, which plans to build green, luxury homes on the property.

In the meantime, CDO is leasing out the 34-acre Biosphere 2 campus to the University of Arizona, which is covering the costs of running the facility through a $30 million grant from Bass' Philecology Foundation. Travis Huxman, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology who is the director of Biosphere 2, says a team of UA faculty consulted among themselves and with outside scientists to determine how they could use the facility for research before agreeing to take it over. "We've seen it go through cycles of promising good science and then being less than able to deliver on it," Huxman says. "We wanted to be sure that we would be doing science that couldn't be done anywhere else and use the facility to full capacity. ... If you can do it somewhere else, you should, because it's cheaper." The new focus: studying the impact of climate change, particularly on water patterns. Several small-scale studies are underway; Huxman was a co-author of the first peer-reviewed paper involving the Biosphere 2 since the UA took it over. The report, which ran in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examined how well piñon pines from New Mexico survived under drought conditions in different biomes. The conclusion: Under typical drought conditions, the pines die off five times more often if temperatures rise by 7 degrees Fahrenheit.

Researchers are now planning their first large-scale experiment. They've cleared out the biome where Biospherians once grew their crops, and the now-bare concrete floor will soon be covered by experimental hillsides to better understand how water moves through the earth from mountains to rivers, says John Adams, Biosphere 2's assistant director for planning and facilities. Once three hillsides have been created, researchers will pour rain onto them and use sensors to measure the movement of the water. After taking those measurements for a few years, they'll add vegetation and eventually start adjusting temperatures and CO2 levels. "This will be an experiment that will be 10 years or longer, and you've got people who are soil scientists; you've got plant physiologists; you've got people who put together all these models and predictions of how things may or may not change if temperatures rise or CO2 levels increase," says Adams.

How water patterns will be altered as a result of climate change remains a mystery. Huxman says Biosphere 2 offers the chance for researchers from hydrology, ecology and atmospheric sciences to find new ways to collaborate on water studies. "It's a little shocking that something that's so important to us doesn't have a stitched-together fundamental theory," Huxman says. "We understood how to split an atom and create an atomic bomb before we understood the physics of how water ascended a tree and evaporated into the atmosphere." Researchers at work on experiments sometimes play a public role, explaining their work to visitors to Biosphere 2. The tours—last year, the facility hosted about 65,000 people, but the university hopes to boost that number to 120,000 within a few years to generate funds to help offset operating costs—take guests through the biomes and offer a look at the old living quarters. Visitors also get a backstage peek at the concrete tunnels underneath Biosphere 2, where rumbling machinery and a network of pipes and vents maintain temperatures and other climate conditions.

Maintaining those environments in the Sonoran Desert summer is not cheap, but the university is working to lower the costs. Opening some windows and venting the giant greenhouse has helped lower energy costs by as much as 70 percent, Adams says. As a first step toward developing solar energy on the property, Biosphere 2 received a donation of 470 solar panels earlier this year, courtesy of SOLON Corp., a German engineering firm that has a Tucson manufacturing plant. The 40 kilowatts of solar panels will help power a collection of casitas and a conference center known as the B2 Institute, where the UA hosts symposiums, teaching seminars and other get-togethers. This summer, for example, it played host to elementary-school science and math teachers from around the state who attended a three-week training course to hone instructional skills.

Jim Gentile, the executive director of Tucson-based Research Corporation for Science Advancement and a member of Biosphere 2's advisory board, says hosting conferences at the facility offers a chance for participants to seriously focus on whatever topic is at hand. "For those kinds of conferences, you don't want to go to a fancy resort, because there's too much else to do," Gentile says. "People lose the focus of why they're there. Having a rattlesnake-surrounded conference center as nice as the Biosphere is really of value."



For more info.: http://www.b2science.org/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1043  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 8:16 AM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561

UA Mathematics Building (Cain Nelson Ware and Cook, 1971)
University of Arizona campus



former Valley National Bank (Friedman/Jobusch, 1971)
3033 E. Broadway



Catalina American Baptist Church (Charles Cox, 1961)
1900 N. Country Club
(photos: Dean Knuth)


Tucson's 'Modern' architectural gems are cited
By Tom Beal
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
08.21.2009

Some significant "Modern" buildings stand out — the church on North Country Club Road with the thin-shelled concrete roof that touches the ground at the edges of its joined parabolas, the big white bank that incorporates its concrete artwork into its temple-like facade or the car dealership with porte-cochere tall enough to shade a semi-truck. Others, built mostly between 1945 and 1975, blend into their strip-mall surroundings, their quality noticed only by a trained eye that appreciates columns aligned with double-mullioned windows.

We tend to dismiss them, lumping them with the aging, less distinguished shops, restaurants and other businesses that cloned themselves along our major streets in those decades of our air-conditioned expansion. The Modern Architecture Preservation Project of Tucson has compiled a list of 50 "exceptionally significant" Modern buildings in an attempt to make us look more closely and appreciate the contributions made by Modern architects to the Tucson street scene. The project hopes that recognition will spare some of these buildings from demolition. A number of factors make them under-appreciated.

• These buildings aren't "Old Pueblo-ish," said architectural historian Annie Nequette. "They don't fit people's picture of what should be here."
• "They're not old," said architect Chris Evans. "They were built, usually within our lifetimes, so people don't accord them the same respect they do historic buildings." People often confuse Modern with "contemporary," Evans said, rather than thinking of Modern as a style that dominated architecture during a 30-year period after World War II.
• Some are simply easy to overlook. Pima Community College's West Campus and the Tucson Police Department's headquarters downtown are prime examples of a Modern style known as "Brutalism," with their unfinished concrete exteriors.

We may have found them stark when first built, but we've grown to accept the style. The police building, said Nequette, "is kind of quiet in a way. Some of those Brutalist buildings are just so solid in terms of the quality of design and construction. The police station doesn't have that kind of 'Look at me' quality." Many of the buildings on the list have uncertain futures, with a number sitting along streets that are slated for widening. "We've made some really good saves," said Nequette, citing the Wilmot branch of the Pima County Library System and the Chicanos por la Causa building, formerly the First National Bank, at 200 N. Stone Ave.

Evans recently completed a renovation of the former Catalina American Baptist Church on Country Club Road. The structure's roof line soars from ground level to a 30-foot apex. The congregation of the church, now named Catalina Church of Midtown, had debated demolition before deciding to restore the church. The Modern church, with its pews and organ loft, is now listed on the National Register of Historic Places and hosts "traditional" worship services. Contemporary services are held in a newer, adjoining building that is equipped with a stage, amplifiers for a variety of musical instruments, lighting and video equipment.


For the complete list and more info.: http://mapptucson.org/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1044  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 6:42 PM
dintares's Avatar
dintares dintares is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland
Posts: 25
New 4th ave. underpass! There was way more people than I expected. Pictures of new park behind Congress and tiki god at The Hut on 4th ave (almost three stories high!)




















Last edited by combusean; Aug 24, 2009 at 1:47 AM. Reason: fixed your tag
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1045  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 7:14 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
Looks pretty cool. Is there anyway you (or someone) could post a map of what this is? I think it is the extension of the old historic trolley, or it could be the initial phase of the new streetcar line. I don't know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1046  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 7:53 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
Looks pretty cool. Is there anyway you (or someone) could post a map of what this is? I think it is the extension of the old historic trolley, or it could be the initial phase of the new streetcar line. I don't know.
All it basically is is just a extension of the old historic trolley. However, it makes getting into downtown Tucson so much easier and faster.

Anyway, I was there until midnight last night and I've never seen so many people downtown. I don't think that downtown Tucson can handle so many people. Everyone was out having a good time. I rode the trolley numerous times. Although it was weird that they didn't have one trolley go the entire length of the route (you had to get off one trolley and hop on the other on 4th ave). They also had a updated map of the modern street car (as well as a lifesized banner of the streetcar over the underpass).

It was really fun. All this for a underpass though.
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1047  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 8:10 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
I guess I don't really get it. But it still seems cool. So the Tucson streetcar project is completely separate?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1048  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 8:54 PM
poconoboy61 poconoboy61 is offline
skyscrapers!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
I guess I don't really get it. But it still seems cool. So the Tucson streetcar project is completely separate?
Before the underpass was completed there was an older streetcar that ran from the U of A down University Boulevard and down 4th Avenue. The streetcar line ended right about a block before the underpass.

Now the older streetcar will go under the underpass, which it hasn't done since 1930, circle around the Rialto Theater downtown, and head back toward the university. This older streetcar is completely volunteer-operated, and its unclear on whether this streetcar will continue to circle around the Rialto or still stop in the same area it has stopped since 1930.

At the same time, the city is developing a modern streetcar that WILL run through downtown, under this same underpass, up 4th Avenue, up University Boulevard, through the university, and to the Medical Center. That streetcar won't be in operation until at least late-2011.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1049  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 9:16 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
Ah ha... now I see. Will the modern streetcar be implemented in phases? Or will the entire thing open at once?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1050  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 11:38 PM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Nice pics of yesterday's underpass celebration, dintares--and no monsoon storm to spoil the party!


Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
Ah ha... now I see. Will the modern streetcar be implemented in phases? Or will the entire thing open at once?
^Yes, it should open all at once--and they're still saying late 2011. Although with the Cushing St. bridge over the Santa Cruz River now in its fourth redesign, I'll guess that it won't be ready until sometime in 2012. (See the Metro Tucson project list for a map of the complete 4-mile line.)

In the meantime, the tracks will be used by the trolley, taking its usual route down 4th Ave. and looping around the Rialto block at the south end, I believe. Once the complete line is finished, the streetcar and trolley will share the tracks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1051  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 5:12 AM
poconoboy61 poconoboy61 is offline
skyscrapers!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneui View Post
Nice pics of yesterday's underpass celebration, dintares--and no monsoon storm to spoil the party!




^Yes, it should open all at once--and they're still saying late 2011. Although with the Cushing St. bridge over the Santa Cruz River now in its fourth redesign, I'll guess that it won't be ready until sometime in 2012. (See the Metro Tucson project list for a map of the complete 4-mile line.)

In the meantime, the tracks will be used by the trolley, taking its usual route down 4th Ave. and looping around the Rialto block at the south end, I believe. Once the complete line is finished, the streetcar and trolley will share the tracks.
ADS noted that the old trolley will NOT continue looping around Rialto. Who knows the reason why.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1052  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 8:41 AM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoboy61 View Post
ADS noted that the old trolley will NOT continue looping around Rialto. Who knows the reason why.
^Perhaps it might interfere with the remaining streetcar line construction, or maybe Phase II of the Infrastructure Improvement Program that will begin soon along Congress, Broadway, and Arizona Ave.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1053  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 8:44 AM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Builders and homeowners in the upscale Mercado District are glad to have their view of downtown back--as well as The Gadsden Co., whose development parcel was temporarily occupied by the city's dirt pile:



(photos: Inside Tucson Business)


Mountain be moved!
By Joe Pangburn
Inside Tucson Business
August 21, 2009

A pile of dirt adjacent to the westside showpiece development Mercado District of Menlo Park has been moved. Home builders in the Mercado say they weren’t looking for handouts from the city but they wanted the obstacles remedied that were hindering them from selling homes. One obstacle was a 70,000 cubic-yard mountain of dirt put there when the city dug a hole for what was going to be a parking garage. Over time that was reduced to a 20,000 cubic yard mountain but it still blocked any view of downtown of anything except the very top of the UniSource Energy tower. In June, city officials told Inside Tucson Business they had no plans to remove the dirt, saying they couldn’t use Rio Nuevo money for it.

But today, that dirt pile is gone. “It makes such a huge difference,” said Dante Archangeli, owner of Tucson Artisan Builders. “I know it was on their list of things to do, but I don’t think it would have happened as quickly if the stories hadn’t come out about it. Jessie Sanders, in the city’s development services department, said the project is part of what they’re calling the “West Side Stabilization Plan” and money to pay for it came from drainage bonds. It cost about $380,000 for dirt work, along with some other expenses for drainage pipes and contingencies.

“The purpose of that dirt was to take surrounding land and elevate it out of the flood plain,” Sanders explained. “We’ve had a historic problem with drainage in that area. We’ve looked at it in detail and have needed to do something about it, but we couldn’t use Rio Nuevo funds for it.” A second pile at the foot of ‘A’ mountain was also to be completely removed as of the end of last week, Sanders said. That pile changed the flow of water runoff from the mountain so that it went north toward Barrio Sin Nombre. The water is supposed to flow south into the Santa Cruz River. “We’re working to restore much of the natural flow,” Sanders said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1054  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 12:51 PM
azliam azliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneui View Post
Builders and homeowners in the upscale Mercado District are glad to have their view of downtown back--as well as The Gadsden Co., whose development parcel was temporarily occupied by the city's dirt pile:



(photos: Inside Tucson Business)


Mountain be moved!
By Joe Pangburn
Inside Tucson Business
August 21, 2009

A pile of dirt adjacent to the westside showpiece development Mercado District of Menlo Park has been moved. Home builders in the Mercado say they weren’t looking for handouts from the city but they wanted the obstacles remedied that were hindering them from selling homes. One obstacle was a 70,000 cubic-yard mountain of dirt put there when the city dug a hole for what was going to be a parking garage. Over time that was reduced to a 20,000 cubic yard mountain but it still blocked any view of downtown of anything except the very top of the UniSource Energy tower. In June, city officials told Inside Tucson Business they had no plans to remove the dirt, saying they couldn’t use Rio Nuevo money for it.

But today, that dirt pile is gone. “It makes such a huge difference,” said Dante Archangeli, owner of Tucson Artisan Builders. “I know it was on their list of things to do, but I don’t think it would have happened as quickly if the stories hadn’t come out about it. Jessie Sanders, in the city’s development services department, said the project is part of what they’re calling the “West Side Stabilization Plan” and money to pay for it came from drainage bonds. It cost about $380,000 for dirt work, along with some other expenses for drainage pipes and contingencies.

“The purpose of that dirt was to take surrounding land and elevate it out of the flood plain,” Sanders explained. “We’ve had a historic problem with drainage in that area. We’ve looked at it in detail and have needed to do something about it, but we couldn’t use Rio Nuevo funds for it.” A second pile at the foot of ‘A’ mountain was also to be completely removed as of the end of last week, Sanders said. That pile changed the flow of water runoff from the mountain so that it went north toward Barrio Sin Nombre. The water is supposed to flow south into the Santa Cruz River. “We’re working to restore much of the natural flow,” Sanders said.
The Mercado District is upscale? All of a sudden? In other words...that area was really "dirt" before there was ANY talk about Rio Nuevo and redevelopment which involved them not spending a dime (looking for a handout). So now, people who should be happy that their property values (let's include business owners and home builders) have completely appreciated are complaining about their "views" of downtown??? GMAFB.!!! I'm all for promoting downtown, but I'd like to see a little more private investment that isn't demanding handouts from the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1055  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 7:25 PM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by azliam View Post
The Mercado District is upscale? All of a sudden? In other words...that area was really "dirt" before there was ANY talk about Rio Nuevo and redevelopment which involved them not spending a dime (looking for a handout). So now, people who should be happy that their property values (let's include business owners and home builders) have completely appreciated are complaining about their "views" of downtown??? GMAFB.!!! I'm all for promoting downtown, but I'd like to see a little more private investment that isn't demanding handouts from the city.
^With most homes selling for over $500k, the new Mercado District is certainly pricier than the surrounding Menlo Park neighborhood. The whole concept of this "New Urbanism" development was built around the idea of having all these new cultural attractions--multiple new museums, rebuilt convento/gardens, etc.--as well as new retail, office, and a streetcar line all within walking distance. Thus, the home prices are a reflection of eventually having all those amenities in place.

With the economic downturn, of course, all the cultural attractions have been postponed indefinitely and most housing construction is at a standstill, which I'm sure hasn't helped property values. Plus, the tight credit markets will undoubtedly affect plans for further proposed development. Other than the Mercado San Agustin currently under construction, they'll be lucky to see the streetcar line finished in a few years.

I know if I had plunked down that kind of money for a home there, having my view blocked by the city's dirt pile would just be adding insult to injury. If there were any handouts, they were given to the developers and builders who took a chance and believed that the city would deliver its part of the bargain--and for the near future, it's not looking very promising.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1056  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2009, 8:35 PM
kaneui kaneui is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
If Flagstaff's efforts to silence the trains passing through are any guideline, it will take at least a few years for all the approvals and implementation:



Plan would silence train whistles in downtown Tucson
By Andrea Kelly
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
08.23.2009

The city wants to take the train whistles out of downtown by improving the safety of four rail road crossings. The topic has been discussed at advisory committee meetings for the Downtown Links road project. The new road will allow traffic to go from Barraza-Aviation Parkway to I-10 by swinging north around downtown and the Union Pacific Rail Road tracks. As part of the road design, the at-grade (or street-level) rail crossing at West Sixth Street and North Ninth Avenue will become “grade separated,” so cars will use an underpass to avoid the trains. This eliminates the need for whistles at that crossing. But in order to apply for a no-whistle zone for the whole downtown area needs to do more. Those crossings would be on North Main Avenue, West Fifth Street, and the intersection of East Seventh Street and North Seventh Avenue.

The crossings need to be upgraded with different gates to make it harder for cars to get around the gates and onto the tracks when a train approaches without an audible warning, said Andrew Singelakis, deputy director for the city’s transportation department. The city is preparing an application with information on improving the safety of the crossings. Clearing the plans with federal, state and railroad officials could take two years, he said. The crossings would be addressed as part of the $84 million Downtown Links project, but the cost of the safer gates and other improvements isn’t estimated yet, said Mike Barton, a senior traffic engineer for HDR engineering firm. The road project is scheduled to be finished by 2015, he said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1057  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2009, 3:18 PM
Leo the Dog Leo the Dog is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Lower-48
Posts: 4,789
Tucson has tremendous potential. Unlike Phoenix, which focused on freeway construction for the past 40 years and is now playing catch up, Tucson has the opportunity to build a nice network of modern streetcars because of the lack of a freeway system down there.

Congrats on the new track milestone down there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1058  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2009, 5:12 PM
Don B. Don B. is offline
...
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,184
^ Tucson has no real potential until they actually start building some stuff in their downtown. I'm not talking about skyscrapers, by the way. I'm talking about dense urban development up to ten stories tall. That's what will make downtown Tucson something special.

Tucson also needs a facelift...random weeds, dirt lots, crummy sidewalks and curbs (if they exist at all) and dirty things does not for a nice city make. They need to start taking some pride in their city, which means spending some frakking (BSG expression) money to make it look decent.

--don
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1059  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2009, 5:50 PM
azliam azliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don B. View Post
^ Tucson has no real potential until they actually start building some stuff in their downtown. I'm not talking about skyscrapers, by the way. I'm talking about dense urban development up to ten stories tall. That's what will make downtown Tucson something special.

Tucson also needs a facelift...random weeds, dirt lots, crummy sidewalks and curbs (if they exist at all) and dirty things does not for a nice city make. They need to start taking some pride in their city, which means spending some frakking (BSG expression) money to make it look decent.

--don
Tucson's had good potential for a long time now. It's just that there haven't been many changes until recently. One thing Tucson IS lacking in (when compared to Phoenix) is empty parking lots that stand where history used to (yes there are a couple of places like that in Tucson, but not nearly as bad as Phoenix).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1060  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2009, 7:32 AM
poconoboy61 poconoboy61 is offline
skyscrapers!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
Well, even if Tucson isn't currently doing much to improve its appearance and urban appeal, it still has the potential to be great when the right leadership finally does step in.

Downtown Tucson has improved by leaps and bounds from this time last year. The opening of Maynards, the construction of One North Fifth, the opening of the 4th Ave underpass, the new electric streetcar rail and poles, the opening of several restaurants that are open well into the night, and the opening of several night spots that cater to the younger crowd are all examples of how Downtown Tucson has improved.

Frankly, I would argue that Downtown Tucson offers a lot that Downtown Phoenix can't. Is Downtown Phoenix full of younger people on weekend nights to the degree of Downtown Tucson? Is there an equivalent to Congress Street in Downtown Phoenix? Has Downtown Phoenix used its old train station as a restaurant/bar with live music well into the night?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.