HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2019, 2:11 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEFTA View Post
Natalie Kostelini referenced it in her article yesterday: "Nine projects in Philadelphia with a total of 1,178 units that, as of the third quarter, are in various stages of planning and approvals but are projected to be completed over the next 36 months. They include the second phase of Edgewater in Logan Square, which will have 240 units, and PMC Group's first phase of Riverwalk on 23rd Street, which will have 321 apartments." It's around 23rd and Race. The first piece of the project was built in 2006. Federal Capital Partners bought the lot for the second piece from JPMorgan Asset Mangement earlier this year. So, maybe this will soon be a go!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2019, 3:28 PM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,254
Yes. I saw that. I was hoping someone here would have heard something else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2019, 4:46 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,637
Merry Christmas everyone!
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 4:00 PM
dreadnought dreadnought is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
Anything built on the Disney hole needs to be +500 ft. I will pocket protest anything less.

I’m not kidding.
Agreed. But what about the large-ish building on the Chestnut Street side of the property? Anything preventing that from being demolished, or would it need to be kept? A full blank city block would be much better for the type of development that that site deserves. It would allow for a public space that East Market lacks at street level (until you get to Independence Mall), just as the Kimmel Center does for South Broad. The Fashion District doesn't count - it's still the Gallery to me, and a mall is rarely a great public space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 4:14 PM
Jawnadelphia's Avatar
Jawnadelphia Jawnadelphia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 2,803
^I don't see anything listed about Edgewater II here, but on the agenda for the LSNA meeting that took place 2 weeks ago - I saw these two items:

1) RCO Presentations:
1701-11 Race Street Phase 1, "Cathedral Place" - Exeter Property Group (EM Race Vine Ventures, LLC)


2) President's Report:
PMC Property request for meeting re: 23rd & Cherry Street lot

http://www.lsnaphilly.org/announceme...boardmeeting-2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 5:58 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnought View Post
Agreed. But what about the large-ish building on the Chestnut Street side of the property? Anything preventing that from being demolished, or would it need to be kept? A full blank city block would be much better for the type of development that that site deserves. It would allow for a public space that East Market lacks at street level (until you get to Independence Mall), just as the Kimmel Center does for South Broad. The Fashion District doesn't count - it's still the Gallery to me, and a mall is rarely a great public space.
I would lament the loss of that building heavily! The Hole covers the entire length of Market between 8th and 9th; I don’t think any demolition is necessary.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2019, 7:01 PM
Jayfar's Avatar
Jayfar Jayfar is offline
Midrise
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
I would lament the loss of that building heavily! The Hole covers the entire length of Market between 8th and 9th; I don’t think any demolition is necessary.
833 Chestnut aka 819-41 Chestnut, built for Gimbels c. 1927, Architect: Graham, Anderson, Probst & White. Yeah, even though it's on neither local nor National Register, I don't think it's going anywhere. It's had a lot of investment in keeping it updated and houses, besides data centers, Jefferson and Ballinger offices.

Supposedly it sold for a pretty penny in 2015, but I see it listed in atlas as last sold in 2005 and still with the same owner as prior to the supposed 2015 sale.

https://www.cpexecutive.com/post/833...r-160-million/

https://www.philadelphiabuildings.or...play.cfm/82490
__________________
Philadelphia Industrial & Commercial Heritage
A public Facebook group to promote appreciation of Greater Philadelphia's industrial and commercial history and advocate for historic preservation and adaptive re-use.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2019, 3:05 PM
Londonee Londonee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fitler Square (via London)
Posts: 2,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618 View Post
I would lament the loss of that building heavily! The Hole covers the entire length of Market between 8th and 9th; I don’t think any demolition is necessary.
Doesn't Goldenberg also owns the adjacent massive lot at 8th and Chestnut? I'm fairly certain they consolidated the parcels as part of their effort to optimize the entire areas development. Ranstead Street bifurcates the lots.

I really hope they have plans for something special and ambitious here. East Market's development and PMC's lot at 23rd and Cherry are probably equal in scale to this and have had no problem getting anchor tenants and financing in place. There really is no excuse save for incompetence or, fingers crossed, they are going big here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2019, 3:34 PM
Redddog Redddog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee View Post
Doesn't Goldenberg also owns the adjacent massive lot at 8th and Chestnut? I'm fairly certain they consolidated the parcels as part of their effort to optimize the entire areas development. Ranstead Street bifurcates the lots.

I really hope they have plans for something special and ambitious here. East Market's development and PMC's lot at 23rd and Cherry are probably equal in scale to this and have had no problem getting anchor tenants and financing in place. There really is no excuse save for incompetence or, fingers crossed, they are going big here.
The D-hole is massive. Absolutely no need to add in 833 Chestnut to the carnage. It seems as incompetence is the prevailing theory at the moment for the lack of development on literally, the largest, most commercially viable urban lot in the US.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2019, 4:00 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
CDR Submissions are up for January. Nothing too major except for Drexel's new Nursing and Health Professions College building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2019, 9:56 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redddog View Post
The D-hole is massive. Absolutely no need to add in 833 Chestnut to the carnage. It seems as incompetence is the prevailing theory at the moment for the lack of development on literally, the largest, most commercially viable urban lot in the US.
Agreed. If Goldenberg acquired 833 Chestnut and applied for a demolition permit, I'd argue that you'd need to be certifiably insane to grant it to them. Even if they presented plans for building a 2000 footer, I just don't know how you'd trust them. After 20 years of failing to get something done here, there's no way they should be allowed to increase the size of this scar. As you and others have pointed out, they've got plenty of room to build basically whatever they want on the land they've got.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 5:17 AM
Londonee Londonee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fitler Square (via London)
Posts: 2,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redddog View Post
The D-hole is massive. Absolutely no need to add in 833 Chestnut to the carnage. It seems as incompetence is the prevailing theory at the moment for the lack of development on literally, the largest, most commercially viable urban lot in the US.
I’m talking about the big lot at 8th and Chestnut - not the building at 9th. This lot, combined with the D Hole, forms an L-Shaped mega lot with the ability to build on the entire 8th street side of the parcel btwn market and chestnut.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 10:45 AM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee View Post
I’m talking about the big lot at 8th and Chestnut - not the building at 9th. This lot, combined with the D Hole, forms an L-Shaped mega lot with the ability to build on the entire 8th street side of the parcel btwn market and chestnut.
I think people were mostly responding to dreadnought, who suggested demo'ing 833 Chestnut, which won't and absolutely should not be done. Yes, Goldenburg owns all of the parking lots between 8th and 9th and Chestnut and Market, allowing for a full build on the giant L-shaped parcel. This is an enormous site without bringing 833 Chestnut into the mix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 5:23 PM
kingtut kingtut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
I think people were mostly responding to dreadnought, who suggested demo'ing 833 Chestnut, which won't and absolutely should not be done. Yes, Goldenburg owns all of the parking lots between 8th and 9th and Chestnut and Market, allowing for a full build on the giant L-shaped parcel. This is an enormous site without bringing 833 Chestnut into the mix.
A huge site indeed , would need a few $billion to develop it .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 8:42 PM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Philly Rising Up!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: motherEarth
Posts: 3,257
Re: 833

Gawd, I think there were be a huge protest and the city would not allow this bldg to be demolish. Don't know if it would qualify as an art-deco building, but I do see the outside has nice features such as roman columns.

This is the only stats I could find on it:

https://42floors.com/us/pa/philadelphia/833-chestnut-st
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 1:36 PM
dreadnought dreadnought is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 31
Just floating the idea, not seriously advocating for 833's demise.
Speaking of this site, does anyone know where I can get a dimensioned site plan for it? There are a few things I would like to know.
TIA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 2:59 PM
Justin7 Justin7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 821
I don't know. I think you were on to something. Let's double down on the Disney Hole. There's more history and beautiful prewar architecture left to wipe out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 3:16 PM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,254
delete

Last edited by SEFTA; Dec 30, 2019 at 5:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 7:05 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
Re: 833

Gawd, I think there were be a huge protest and the city would not allow this bldg to be demolish. Don't know if it would qualify as an art-deco building, but I do see the outside has nice features such as roman columns.

This is the only stats I could find on it:

https://42floors.com/us/pa/philadelphia/833-chestnut-st
Yes, that would never happen. Unless...




















Some jewelry makers or other artisans were first working out of the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 8:41 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,863
833 Chestnut's façade is really more Beaux-Arts than Art Deco. Originally built as the last and largest annex of the Gimbels department store at 9th and Market, it harmonized with the façades of the store's existing buildings:

__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.