Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone
Well, according to that CBC article, the Reaper has a state of the art anti-icing/de-icing system, ...
|
Yeah. That's why just a few months they were talking about pushing this back till they could prove that capability.....
It's just not as capable in that environment as the MQ-4C Triton (a marinized Global Hawk) that are used by the USN and RAAF and literally designed as a complement to the Poseidon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nort...n_MQ-4C_Triton
From what I am hearing though, the work around here is that these do more work on the coasts and free up P-8s to spend more time up north. So maybe icing is less of an issue. But really in that case, it would have been better to buy 5 Tritons and park them in Yellowknife.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone
...and by the looks of it, Canada is addressing the satellite/communication issues related to flying this drone in northern latitudes.
|
Comms in the Arctic is in many ways a relatively Canadian problem. The US just cares less about it. So Canada is the lead on a number of major satcom projects that should come online over the next decade or so to provide that bandwidth. It's not just comms. There's also projects looking at improving satnav reliability up there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone
I think having Reapers is better than nothing.
|
I think this is the mentality that gets us stuck with obsolete kit or stuff that just doesn't fit the purpose. It's the mindset that got us the disasters that are the Cyclone Helicopter and the Kingfisher SAR aircraft. At least this one won't kill people (we hope).
Personally this whole project just sounds like a bunch of air force generals really wanted armed drones and were trying to sell it to the government so they added "Arctic Surveillance" as an afterthought. It's not 2010. Drones are now a whole family of capabilities. Need to match the tool to the job.