HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2014, 12:17 AM
Luk_o's Avatar
Luk_o Luk_o is offline
Traditional Ale User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ramsay,CGY
Posts: 446
I like the look of the balconies as is. L-Tower is turning out fantastic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 2:06 PM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
As much as I love L-Tower, I am now wondering what it would look like without any balconies. Don't get me wrong, I do like it as is, but am thinking...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 2:19 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,174
It would have looked hella' betta'...

No doubt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 3:05 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,070
It may have looked better if the balconies weren't part of the stripes and matched the window wall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:25 PM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
It may have looked better if the balconies weren't part of the stripes and matched the window wall.
I think my opinion is leaning towards this view. The contrast of the balconies exaggerates their feature and makes them more noticeable. I'm not against having them, but think it may have been improved if they weren't so "stand outish".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:13 PM
MTLskyline's Avatar
MTLskyline MTLskyline is offline
The good old days are now
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 4,256
At least they are of the loggia type rather than the kind that protrudes from the facade.
__________________
Montreal Skyline Photo Group
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:23 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTLskyline View Post
At least they are of the loggia type rather than the kind that protrudes from the facade.
Exactly. That makes all the difference. Toronto has too many condo towers with wrap-around balconies as it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 4:38 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,812
Monolithic and soulless like most office buildings?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 5:12 PM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,809
I like the balconies. They disrupt the all-glass monotony.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2014, 4:08 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,174
BACE Webcam shot

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2014, 10:29 PM
KnoxfordGuy's Avatar
KnoxfordGuy KnoxfordGuy is offline
New Brunswick booster!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 1,653
I've been wondering this for quite some time. What is it with the obsession that Toronto has with balconies? I feel they make a building seem temporary looking. not sure why. Just makes them seem almost cheap.

I don't see this going in in Chicago or New York...but maybe I'm just not looking hard enough. Just seems Toronto has more than its fair share.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 1:00 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnoxfordGuy View Post
I've been wondering this for quite some time. What is it with the obsession that Toronto has with balconies? I feel they make a building seem temporary looking. not sure why. Just makes them seem almost cheap.

I don't see this going in in Chicago or New York...but maybe I'm just not looking hard enough. Just seems Toronto has more than its fair share.
I totally agree. Except in rare circumstances, balconies just look tacked on and ruin the aesthetic of a tower. That's why I prefer wraparound balconies or inset balconies (or ideally none at all).

I don't think you see balconies in New York or Chicago so much because most of their skyscrapers are office towers, whereas Toronto's boom is happening in a time when residential skyscrapers are becoming more common.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 6:32 PM
uzi's Avatar
uzi uzi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnoxfordGuy View Post
I've been wondering this for quite some time. What is it with the obsession that Toronto has with balconies? I feel they make a building seem temporary looking. not sure why. Just makes them seem almost cheap.

I don't see this going in in Chicago or New York...but maybe I'm just not looking hard enough. Just seems Toronto has more than its fair share.
you know what gives them a cheap look. most of them are same-cheap boxes with cheap green glass. that's why they look cheap and temporary.
__________________
RESPECT FOR EVERYONE
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2014, 10:34 PM
P Unit P Unit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Danforth
Posts: 365
Despite whatever aesthetic issues they present to an exterior of a building, highrise balconies are awesome. I would never live in a building without one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 1:45 AM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Got to disagree with the comments re balconies in Chicago. I'm there right now and a lot of the condos have balconies. Not as many as Toronto, granted, but still a significant number.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 4:31 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,070
Units are small, narrow and, deep in Toronto. Balconies count towards amenity space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 7:10 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,015
I have no problems with balconies, projected, recessed, or other, as long as they are large enough to be useful, and are part of the expression of the tower.


by Yellowfever

Anything other than a monolithic, corporate-looking tower aesthetic may not appeal to many fanboys, but I think it would be great if every condo household had an outdoor "room" in the sky to dine in and enjoy the sunset, in the company and in view of other balcony/terrace dwellers. It's the only way you can convince suburbanites to give up their lawns and backyard patios


https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7396/...3dee35580a.jpg

Last edited by dleung; Feb 17, 2014 at 5:56 AM. Reason: citation
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 8:22 PM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,809
I am also puzzled by the aesthetic distaste for balconies. I concede that they don't look good on any and all buildings, but a blanket aversion to them is curious. To each his own, I guess. Buildings like the Casa trio would be just more plain, sterile glass edifices without the horizontal protrusions that give them a bit of visual character and gusto. Casa III:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 8:41 PM
dtgeek dtgeek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gresto View Post
I am also puzzled by the aesthetic distaste for balconies. I concede that they don't look good on any and all buildings, but a blanket aversion to them is curious. To each his own, I guess. Buildings like the Casa trio would be just more plain, sterile glass edifices without the horizontal protrusions that give them a bit of visual character and gusto. Casa III:
The fact that you had to post an artist's rendering, rather than an actual photo (preferably not gussied up with HDR and other effects) of a good-looking building with balconies kind of makes your argument fall flat on its face.

There are certainly a few buildings that I think look good despite their balconies, like 1 St Thomas (especially) and Shangri La Toronto, but even those would look better without IMHO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2014, 8:47 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,070
Balcony glass is above the usual window wall. Also adds depth to the design. I don't get the dislike of them either
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.