Quote:
Originally Posted by Chef Boyardee
Regarding the discussion on the previous page about hollywood and downtown, there's a couple of obvious differences between the two: One is that Hollywood always had Hollywood Hills, one of the wealthier and most desirable hoods in LA, directly above it. Some of that money had to trickle down. Downtown on the other hand was a low income neighborhood surrounded by other low income neighborhoods. The other is that even during Hollywood's nadir in the 70's/80's/90's it was still a tourist destination because of its name. Downtown never was. I remember in the 80's it was always funny to us kids watching tourists wander hollywood blvd amid the hookers, looking completely terrified. But buses of them still came every day.
|
I always find that interesting. Even now when I show people around LA they usually like Hollywood (as in Hollywood and Vine/Highland) the least, but they still want to go even when I tell them what's there. I kinda like crush of seedyness and shopping, it's pretty weird in a good way, but other people find it too touristy. But people I've had out here seem to prefer Downtown and Santa Monica more in the end. I'm not sure what metrics to use, but it would be great to map/chart tourism across the city. Downtown for sure is on the rise, even for local tourism, and with more hotels and central metro location, it's a great place to stay.