HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2008, 11:40 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,480
Portland's Tram:













^ wikipedia commons
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2010, 6:05 PM
Steven Dale Steven Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Hey all,

I'm big into Cable Propelled Transit (CPT), if anyone's interested. I recently started www.gondolaproject.com as a means to help people learn about the technology. A quick glance around the internet will show you that there's virtually no publicly accessible research available on the topic of urban gondolas and cable propelled transit (CPT).

I started working with the technology three years ago, and I've been touring systems around the world and developing a body of research on the matter. I'll continue touring installations for the next year as well.

It would be impossible to address everyone's concerns in one post, but just let me say this: Cable is remarkably flexible, safe, fast and cheap. I was stunned myself to learn these things, but they're a fact. If anyone has any specific questions about the tech, you can ask me here or you could head on over to www.gondolaproject.com and submit questions in the comments section.

One thing I'm trying to do with the site is not just have me pontificating about the virtues of the technology. Instead, I'd really love to see people get involved and excited about the technology. Skeptics are incredibly welcome.

I'm really excited to see this topic generate the interest that it did.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2010, 1:20 AM
Rail>Auto's Avatar
Rail>Auto Rail>Auto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 500
I would like to see the Bubbles N Beams concept incorporated into a PRT system where pods go above and below the guideway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted May 24, 2011, 4:26 AM
BnSwiss BnSwiss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8
it would be interesting to see a city planed around gondolas like in dubai or something where it could connect high-rises by the 20th floor and stuff it could be very cool. I think it is very practical in urban settings the poles dont take up that much space and they can really go almost anywhere. Its space effective like a suspended monorail yet not nearly as expensive I think colorado should do this also as a means of mass transit not just for tourists. I think this should be examined as an alternative to streetcars in some cases as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted May 28, 2011, 9:42 AM
fieldsofdreams's Avatar
fieldsofdreams fieldsofdreams is offline
A public transport guru
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Francisco + Manila
Posts: 66
I think Hong Kong has already a tram that acts as a gondola climbing up Victoria Peak from its base in Central that brings commuters and tourists up and down Hong Kong Island, and I think this solution would be best if the conditions are right, including:

- Steep hills or valleys that road construction and bus transit may be next to impossible;
- Long waterways that can be a challenge to road building or making a new bridge; or
- An overcrowded Downtown core that has limited space for growth and development

I think that gondolas would be a great idea to add as a public transportation mode, but, the issue with this one would be the power source (not all can come from clean energy), fares (can be significantly higher due to initial capital costs), and maintenance (short- and long-term) .
__________________
Anthony
Urban Studies & Planning Student, San Francisco State University
Reach out to me through my blog - Latest: Part 3 of my evaluation of Santa Clara's Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
Socialize with me on Facebook, on Twitter, and on Photobucket
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted May 28, 2011, 11:34 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,999
I tried the Roosevelt Island gondola in New York recently. Great fun. Of course it exists because there's no bridge from Manhattan. One interesting aspectwas that while the west end is about 30' up, the east end is at ground level, on a slight rise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted May 29, 2011, 1:04 AM
Chicago103's Avatar
Chicago103 Chicago103 is offline
Future Mayor of Chicago
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,060
Chicago's flirtation with this idea at the 1933-1934 Century of Progress World's Fair. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_Ride






Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted May 29, 2011, 2:28 AM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Aha! The Skyride at the Centry of Progress Exposition 1933 is a different, highly workable beast, and the idea is not new, yet is simply "brilliant."

The gondola is tethered below a fairly rigid cabling system that itself is suspended like the roadway might be under a suspension bridge. The cabliing setup is put under pension but not undue rigidity, i.e., the gondola is hung downwards from a giving 'roadway."

Some very nice attributes:

A) The sprung mass of a supporting cabling system is much less then that of a reinforced steel, asphalt, and, concrete roadway that is suspenended (square cube law works here too).

B) The sectional area cutting into the wind is a fraction (depending on cabling setup/very light large suspended
"U" track, etc) of that of rectolinear road section wind loads , further reducing the need for supportive structural mass.

C) As the deflection produced by the suspended mass between supports needs far less deflection, the speeds can be much higher.

With CADCAM, a good dose of mental sweat, and, a little understanding of physics this concept would work very well now.

Cable cars traveling at 50 or 60 km/h?
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted May 29, 2011, 2:34 AM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,109
Maybe they could build a Gondola (Aerial Tram) between Manhattan, and Governor's Island.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted May 29, 2011, 2:48 AM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
People in 1933 could be pretty smart...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
Maybe they could build a Gondola (Aerial Tram) between Manhattan, and Governor's Island.
Very workable using about 5-10% of the material of a pedestrian/motorcycle suspension bridge, IMO.

You could lower the costs even more if the maritime traffic permitted between Manhattan and Governor's Island had fairly low "mast height limits."
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted May 29, 2011, 4:12 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,375
Vancouver - Burnaby is planning or thinking of a gondola/tram to link the m-line skytrain and burnaby mountain/SFU

http://www.translink.ca/~/media/Docu...%20Boards.ashx

London, UK is also planning or looking at a sky gondola

http://gondolaproject.com/2010/11/08...rban-gondolas/
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:32 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.