[Halifax] Skye Halifax (1565 Granville) | 66 m | 2 x 21 fl | U/C - Page 49

Dmajackson · #**961** Posted **Apr 8, 2022, 4:37 PM**

^It's for the approved 21-storey version of this proposal. Regional Council has to approve the post-bonus public benefit portion of downtown proposals. Normally it means construction is imminent or has already started.

Case 22444 - Incentive or Bonus Zoning Agreement for 1549 Granville Street

EDIT: Btw the proposed benefit is undergrounding of utilities on Granville Street.

OldDartmouthMark · #**962** Posted **Apr 8, 2022, 4:41 PM**

Great news! Soon I'll be able to stop complaining about their unsightly lot!

Keith P. · #**963** Posted **Apr 9, 2022, 11:43 AM**

I thought this got derailed again ages ago since there has been no progress for so long. I guess the bleatings of certain Council members that the province did not need to step in to streamline their approval processes were not necessarily accurate.

kzt79 · #**964** Posted **Apr 13, 2022, 2:11 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith P.

I thought this got derailed again ages ago since there has been no progress for so long. I guess the bleatings of certain Council members that the province did not need to step in to streamline their approval processes were not necessarily accurate.

I bet they were up on their hind legs and all!

This kick in the butt from the province is very badly needed. Hopefully not too little too late!

Aegon123 · #**965** Posted **May 1, 2022, 2:47 PM**

Is there any update on the approval of the request heard in early April? How long does it usually take to get the permit? It seems like a very drawn out process.

kzt79 · #**966** Posted **May 2, 2022, 12:53 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aegon123

Is there any update on the approval of the request heard in early April? How long does it usually take to get the permit? It seems like a very drawn out process.

We are now approaching the third decade with this site. I'm not holding my breath.

someone123 · #**967** Posted **Nov 28, 2022, 7:15 PM**

Really shows how strange this site is.

Source

Drybrain · #**968** Posted **Nov 29, 2022, 12:14 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by someone123

Really shows how strange this site is.

Also how the backside of the Roy oddly has more potential for interaction with the sidewalk than the front does.

Arrdeeharharharbour · #**969** Posted **Nov 29, 2022, 12:50 AM**

The Roy has a Granville St. address. This is the front side... though I don't think there is a back side rather just two faces on different streets.

Keith P. · #**970** Posted **Nov 29, 2022, 1:44 PM**

If you think back to the original Roy building, the Grannville St side always had storefronts at sidewalk level even if they were well-disguised.

OldDartmouthMark · #**971** Posted **Nov 29, 2022, 2:32 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith P.

If you think back to the original Roy building, the Grannville St side always had storefronts at sidewalk level even if they were well-disguised.

The original Roy building had its most prominent storefronts on Barrington, though (1955 below).

Source

Keith P. · #**972** Posted **Nov 29, 2022, 8:08 PM**

Of course, Barrington used to be the main retail shopping street back then. It no longer is, like most such streets throughout much of North America.

OldDartmouthMark · #**973** Posted **Nov 29, 2022, 8:45 PM**

I actually liked the Granville side of the original Roy better than the Barrington side, and that holds true with the new 'Roy'. I think the Barrington facade fell flat with the current iteration, but the other side seems to imitate a building of the early 20th century quite well in it's architectural layout. JMHO.

IanWatson · #**974** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 3:37 AM**

Demo permit has been issued.

kzt79 · #**975** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 12:07 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by IanWatson

Demo permit has been issued.

What is there to demolish, isn't it a vacant lot?

Saul Goode · #**976** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 12:18 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by kzt79

What is there to demolish, isn't it a vacant lot?

1568 Hollis Street - the office building just south of the Texpark lot.

kzt79 · #**977** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 2:10 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Goode

1568 Hollis Street - the office building just south of the Texpark lot.

Oh right! Thanks!

Would be incredible to finally see some activity at this site. I remember all the controversy around it 20+ years ago when I was a student. Now, so many other projects have been proposed and built while this empty lot lingers on... I'll believe it when I see it!

teddifax · #**978** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 5:37 PM**

I think every one of these development links, should have a way of keeping a direct link to the actual up-to-date development proposal, having it for easy access. So many times, I want to look up what a development looks like and the actual information is so far away. Can this be done?

someone123 · #**979** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 5:42 PM**

I wonder about this 66 m height. I guess that's ramparts max? The Maple is 72 m with the same floor count. Maybe they are measuring from the Granville side?

In any case, hopefully this means construction will begin soon.

Saul Goode · #**980** Posted **Jan 20, 2023, 7:19 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by someone123

I wonder about this 66 m height. I guess that's ramparts max? The Maple is 72 m with the same floor count. Maybe they are measuring from the Granville side?

In any case, hopefully this means construction will begin soon.

Whatever the case, it's another criminally "blah" 20-storey tabletop structure.