HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 4:46 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,980
Not a fan of either scheme since the built form looks like it could be anywhere rather than celebrating the unique topography and views from the site, but at least the Eagle scheme has a clear diagonal axis through the site with sightlines to downtown Vancouver to orient people, and I can imagine a cascading creek feature running downhill along that axis as a unifying element for the neighbourhood
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 12:16 AM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,574
Hopefully that is that a soccer field in the middle.

are this reclaimed/natural streams or fake water features?
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2022, 5:17 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,191
Quote:
Jericho Coalition Opposes Plans for Jericho Lands

$3,255 raised of $10,000 goal
36 donations

Tom Stevens is organizing this fundraiser.
We all love the Jericho area in West Point Grey next to Kitsilano, with its parks and beaches, and we hope you do too. That's why we are asking for your help.

The MST Development Corp and Canada Lands Company want to build 64 high-rises, ranging from 15-38 storeys, on 90 acres of the Jericho Lands. This development would be a massive overreach in scale and density, and it would put a giant scar on Vancouver's sightlines.

• The density and built form are not compatible with the surrounding neighbourhoods and are without precedent for Vancouver. The development would have a density of 50,000/km² – 2.5 x more than the West End and 3 x denser than False Creek North.
• The proposal envisions a separate "transit-oriented" development, although there is no certainty that a subway extension will ever be built. Even with a subway, the development, with its projected 20,000 residents, would create massive traffic congestion throughout Kitsilano and West Point Grey.
• The proposed towers in this dense development are designed to exploit the view and monetize it. This is not a development for Vancouverites, and it will do little to mitigate Vancouver's housing crisis.
• A development this dense would profoundly impact the natural and recreation values of Jericho Park and the beaches beyond, which offer a refuge from the urban cityscape for all Vancouverites.

We welcome an urban development for the Jericho Lands that replicates the scale and density such as the Arbutus Walk area (NW of 12th Avenue & Arbutus Street).

We urge City Council to pause the project approval process and require the developers to redesign their project at an appropriate scale and density.

We are a small group of dedicated citizens who want to prevent this gigantic development. We would welcome an alternative plan at an appropriate scale and density.

Please support our lobbying efforts by donating. Thank you!
https://www.gofundme.com/f/jericho-c...ho-lands-plans



Quote:
BillTieleman @BillTieleman
Replying to @charlesincities
The Jericho Coalition is a client who I support as a Kitsilano resident. Other local residents make up this new Coalition. Not everyone wants to be publicly bashed for demanding democratic consultation about an enormous development. /1 https://jerichocoalition.org
https://twitter.com/BillTieleman/sta...52308014886912


I can safely say I've never seen this before. Some of the West Point Grey Residents Association members have formed a new opposition group, set up a fund raiser that's received over $3,200 in donations to oppose the Jericho Lands, and hired a consultation firm to aid their efforts too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2022, 5:35 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,588
There's a reason why they want that scale of development. I mean most of their points are laughable at best especially considering who is backing the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 5:39 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,677
I think when these folks say "we love Kits" they actually mean west of Vine Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 10:23 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I think when these folks say "we love Kits" they actually mean west of Vine Street.
Rather, they like living there and coming to Kits. Kits coming to them would be the Worst Thing Ever (TM).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 12:17 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Rather, they like living there and coming to Kits. Kits coming to them would be the Worst Thing Ever (TM).
I bet they even love coming downtown: the nicer areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 5:47 PM
svlt svlt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
I think when these folks say "we love Kits" they actually mean west of Vine Street.
That doesn't even capture the beach or Kits Point - which has some of the more expensive RE in the neighborhood!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 1:37 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,396
In other news, Patrick Condon has finally outed himself as a reactionary.

Quote:
The Jericho Lands Need a Human-Scaled Rethink

(link)

... Tall buildings of such mass cast shadows to match. We have seen the shadow simulations. Expect serious impacts on Jericho Park and habitat spaces. And yet, even these renderings do not fully represent the maximum number of additional tall buildings that the city has signalled it may consider. While the renderings show a combination of mid- to high-rise buildings, the plans and their explanatory key indicate buildings may go “up to” significantly greater heights.

The Jericho Coalition is a group of engaged and concerned volunteer citizens — including planners, engineers, architects and environmentalists — who have come together after only recently learning about the city’s proposals. They are opposed to the proposed approach, not solely because of the maximum heights but for multiple reasons. The towers are too big, unsustainable and units will be too expensive, to name a few.

Moreover, their modelling leads them to conclude the “scaled back” version rendered by the proponents above could actually become the scenario below including the prospect of 63 towers. The coalition has used these “up to” maximum heights to produce the images below...

... Vancouver area planners have a term for putting clusters of dense high-rises around train stations — “transit-oriented development.” A prime example is Burnaby’s Metrotown. And now it appears something of a similar monumental scale is proposed for Vancouver’s west side.

Is there an alternative? Are there better ways to build out this site that produce as many units of housing, as much density and a similar number of units per acre? And if so, would the city consider a less overpowering option?...

... Instead of a cluster of high-rises, this is what the Jericho Lands community could be:


... Guess what? The comparative images below equally produce the same developable floor area (approximately 693,000 square metres or 7,459,390 square feet), at the same density, and with the same net building footprint (approximately 100,000 square metres or 1,076,391 square feet) with the community’s proposal providing even more public park space (an additional 4,685 square metres or 50,429 square feet). The contrast between visual impacts from eye level are obvious. But the difference in community quality is even more significant...
The actual Eagle, for reference. So somehow less public space becomes more public space? Does he also have a bridge for sale, by any chance?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 2:23 AM
Sheba Sheba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
In other news, Patrick Condon has finally outed himself as a reactionary.

The Jericho Coalition is a group of engaged and concerned volunteer citizens — including planners, engineers, architects and environmentalists — who have come together after only recently learning about the city’s proposals. They are opposed to the proposed approach, not solely because of the maximum heights but for multiple reasons. The towers are too big, unsustainable and units will be too expensive, to name a few.

The actual Eagle, for reference. So somehow less public space becomes more public space? Does he also have a bridge for sale, by any chance?
Seriously - they're just learning about this project *now*? What have all these professional people been doing for the last three years? You'd think if they were dead set against this project they would have spoken up right away when they had (no) hope in hell of achieving anything.

Not that it would have made much of a difference, as the CoV isn't the people they get to complain at. I'm sure the First Nations behind this are going to care soooo much that local Nimbys are having conniption fits.

Honestly most of the Metro region will have to accept the fact that SFH isn't the be all and end all, and that we need to densify across the board. Maybe if we'd already started doing that then this project wouldn't be as big (or more likely it wouldn't stand out as much as it does now).

FYI I like that 'scary' tall towers image.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 4:18 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,677
"The Jericho Coalition is a group of engaged and concerned volunteer citizens — including planners, engineers, architects and environmentalists "

Odd, they didn't include affordable housing advocates, renters, families with young kids...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 4:51 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
"The Jericho Coalition is a group of engaged and concerned volunteer citizens — including planners, engineers, architects and environmentalists "

Odd, they didn't include affordable housing advocates, renters, families with young kids...
They also need to post a diversity statement of their grand coalition of balding white guys with glasses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 6:04 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,396
In fairness, there should also be some white soccer moms in the mix, plus the Asian lawyer they hired to sue the City.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 7:28 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,280
"The Jericho Coalition is a group of engaged and concerned volunteer citizens — including planners, engineers, architects and environmentalists"

I bet that's a blatant lie, or at least perhaps just one of each profession represented, and a retired one at that:
perpetually enjoying BBQ-ing in his SFH backyard patio with the Karen wife while secretly cheering on Trump.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2023, 11:57 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,191
Quote:
Phase 3.5
Between March 6 and March 26, we’re adding a new phase in the planning process (Phase 3.5). The intention is to provide a project and process update and share the outcomes of the landowners’ recent engagement with the Host Nations.

Next steps
We’re working towards Phase 4 of engagement where we’ll be sharing a refined site concept and other information in June 2023.
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/jericho-lands


Quote:
Inspire Jericho Talks: Creating Great Neighbourhoods: Celebrating MST Culture at ʔəy̓alməxw/Iy̓álmexw/Jericho Lands

How do we return Indigenous culture to the lands it came from? How do we integrate traditional ways of being in a contemporary context? How can Indigenous design principles help shape the future of our city and region?

Come and hear from Cultural Liaisons from the xʷməθkʷəy᾽əm (Musqueam), Sḵwx̱ wú7mesh (Squamish), and səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) Nations as they share how stories, ideas, wisdom and aspirations from their knowledge keepers, elders and communities set the foundation for planning and design of the ʔəy̓alməxw/Iy̓álmexw/Jericho Lands.

The Cultural Liaisons
Charleen Grant, xʷməθkʷəy᾽əm (Musqueam)
Sxelaltenaat-Adrienne Charlie and Ts’kanchtn-Calvin Charlie-Dawson, Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish)
Whonoak-Dennis Thomas and William George Thomas, səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh)


Inspire Jericho Talks is a speaker series to share inspiration, spark ideas and explore the possibilities for the Jericho Lands redevelopment.

When: Thursday, April 13, 2023 - 7:00pm - 9:00pm (Doors open 6:30pm)

Where: UBC Robson Square, C300 (Theatre), 800 Robson Street, Vancouver

Tickets are complimentary; however, seating is limited and advance registration is required
https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/inspire-...s-536240609097
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2023, 2:30 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,685
"Future of Vancouver's Jericho Lands to be revealed on June 16"

https://vancouversun.com/opinion/col...led-on-june-16

MST and CoV remain tight lipped until then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2023, 2:41 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,588
They're building the towers. There ain't no option C for their fantasy land townhouses idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2023, 2:47 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,811
Interesting history for the CEO

Chief Executive OfficerChief Executive Officer
MST Development CorporationMST Development Corporation
Dec 2016 - Present · 6 yrs 7 mosDec 2016 - Present · 6 yrs 7 mos
Aquilini Development logo
PresidentPresident
Aquilini DevelopmentAquilini Development
2007 - Nov 2016 · 9 yrs 11 mos2007 - Nov 2016 · 9 yrs 11 mos
Concord Pacific Developments Inc. logo
Senior Vice PresidentSenior Vice President
Concord Pacific Developments Inc.Concord Pacific Developments Inc.
2002 - 2007 · 5 yrs2002 - 2007 · 5 yrs
Concord Pacific Developments Inc. logo
Vice PresidentVice President
Concord Pacific Developments Inc.Concord Pacific Developments Inc.
1994 - 2001 · 7 yrs1994 - 2001 · 7 yrs
Concord Pacific Developments Inc. logo
Development ManagerDevelopment Manager
Concord Pacific Developments Inc.Concord Pacific Developments Inc.
1988 - 1993 · 5 yrs
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2023, 3:37 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is online now
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,591
Quote:
“The future of the Jericho Lands is this council’s Chinatown freeway movement,” says the Jericho Coalition’s handout, referring to the successful fight in 1968 to stop Vancouver’s Chinese heritage hub being ruined by a highway.
Rich, white homeowners comparing themselves to disadvantaged minorities with no political capital
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2023, 3:41 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
They're building the towers. There ain't no option C for their fantasy land townhouses idea.
Shovels in the ground let's gooooo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.