HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 10:39 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,435
50 largest US metros listed by vehicle miles traveled per capita

As of 2023, per Republica:
  1. New York - 14.4
  2. Philadelphia - 21.1
  3. San Francisco-Oakland - 21.7
  4. Chicago - 21.8
  5. Boston - 22.8
  6. Seattle - 22.9
  7. Portland - 23.3
  8. Las Vegas - 23.6
  9. Miami - 23.7
  10. Los Angeles - 24.2
  11. Buffalo - 24.2
  12. San Jose - 24.3
  13. New Orleans - 24.9
  14. Pittsburgh - 25.2
  15. Salt Lake City - 25.4
  16. Providence - 26.3
  17. Milwaukee - 26.7
  18. Tampa - 27
  19. Sacramento - 27.2
  20. Hartford - 27.2
  21. Orlando - 27.3
  22. Cleveland - 27.4
  23. Denver - 28
  24. Phoenix - 28.1
  25. Washington, DC - 28.1
  26. San Diego - 28.5
  27. Indianapolis - 29.2
  28. Minneapolis - 29.3
  29. Austin - 29.3
  30. Louisville - 29.4
  31. Columbus - 30.1
  32. Dallas-Fort Worth - 30.1
  33. Houston - 30.4
  34. Detroit - 30.5
  35. Cincinnati - 30.5
  36. Baltimore - 30.9
  37. San Antonio - 31.5
  38. Virginia Beach-Norfolk - 31.7
  39. Kansas City - 31.7
  40. Riverside-San Bernadino - 32.3
  41. Oklahoma City - 32.5
  42. St. Louis - 32.7
  43. Atlanta - 33.6
  44. Memphis - 35.2
  45. Richmond - 35.5
  46. Charlotte - 35.5
  47. Nashville - 35.5
  48. Jacksonville - 36
  49. Birmingham - 36.1
  50. Raleigh - 38.1

source: https://www.replicahq.com/2023-vmt-rankings

New York drives the fewest miles by far, as expected. Phoenix being even with DC was a bit of a surprise. I'm also a little surprised that Dallas and Houston drive slightly fewer miles than Detroit. Raleigh having the most miles driven is also not unexpected.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 10:41 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,494
Given it's level of transit infrastructure, DC's placement is quite the surprise to me.

I expected it in the top 6 with other usual urban suspects.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 11:09 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
Given it's level of transit infrastructure, DC's placement is quite the surprise to me.

I expected it in the top 6 with other usual urban suspects.
Northern Virginia and suburban Maryland are pretty auto-oriented parts of the DC metro. Most area residents live in VA or Maryland suburbs, and huge numbers of them work out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2024, 11:11 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39,237
San Francisco and San Jose faired a lot better than I thought they would. LA too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2024, 1:08 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 32,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
Northern Virginia and suburban Maryland are pretty auto-oriented parts of the DC metro. Most area residents live in VA or Maryland suburbs, and huge numbers of them work out there as well.
But I believe DC also has the highest transit share of any metro outside NYC. DC is apparently the big outlier among the transit-oriented six.

It's likely that many DC transit commuters are driving to park-and-rides and then taking transit. The region has insufferable traffic and federal workers are heavily incentivized to use transit.

Philly is kinda funny too. I believe Philly has the worst transit share of the big 6, yet the VMT are second to NYC. Lots of walkers, and short driving commutes, apparently. Philly also doesn't have terrible traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2024, 1:19 AM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
But I believe DC also has the highest transit share of any metro outside NYC. DC is apparently the big outlier among the transit-oriented six.

It's likely that many DC transit commuters are driving to park-and-rides and then taking transit. The region has insufferable traffic and federal workers are heavily incentivized to use transit.

Philly is kinda funny too. I believe Philly has the worst transit share of the big 6, yet the VMT are second to NYC. Lots of walkers, and short driving commutes, apparently. Philly also doesn't have terrible traffic.
A disproportionate number of people in Philly walk to work.

I think our decentralized job centers might also help, counterintuitively. We have multiple job centers in the suburbs and it could be that the people who work in them largely live nearby. And yes, our traffic is not terrible by big city standards.

I know NOVA has a lot of job centers as well. but Philly doesn't have sprawl that looks anything like Loudon County or Will County outside of Chicago. Once you get about 45-50 minutes west of Philly you effectively hit a green belt and that continues until you hit the suburbs of SE PA's tier 2 cities (Lancaster, Reading, Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton) which have their own little suburban rings and commuting patterns. Heading east into NJ maybe 35-40 minutes out you hit the Pine Barrens in which development is literally outlawed...so we're just sorta hemmed in.

Last edited by 3rd&Brown; Sep 25, 2024 at 1:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2024, 3:25 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by JManc View Post
San Francisco and San Jose faired a lot better than I thought they would. LA too.
Yeah, regional job dispersal in the California metros gives workers a shot at living closer to their workplaces. That's why the average commute time in LA is 30.9 minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:54 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.