Quote:
Originally Posted by cardeza
Not sure if anyone posted this CCD report on low wage job growth. I do think that specifically counting private sector jobs only skews the numbers downward, but I'm not surprised by their decision to frame the story in this way. Its hard to get an accurate picture of the job situation if you exclude universities, education based jobs and government jobs- especially in this city. Based on the charts the number of jobs is the highest it's been since around 1990/91.
http://www.centercityphila.org/uploa...web-update.pdf
|
Good points. Also worth noting that all of the comparison cities (excluding DC, Baltimore and NYC) includes many counties with incorporated suburbs, or at least suburban territory (i.e., Cook County, IL for Chicago or Davidson County, TN for Nashville), whereas Philadelphia County is all urban core. In a metro area where the vast majority of high-paying companies/opportunities are still in the collar counties, that's obviously going to skew the numbers in the city proper.
Additionally, of the 13,200 nonfarm jobs added in Philadelphia over the past year (as of September 2019), 4,200 of them were in the Professional and Technical Services category, or approximately 32%
https://www.workstats.dli.pa.gov/Doc...ilamesa_pr.pdf. According to this Inky article (
https://www.inquirer.com/news/philad...-20180709.html), that category pays an average wage of
$142,844 in Philly--not too shabby:
https://www.inquirer.com/news/philad...-20180709.html
So, while the CCD comparison is not completely worthless, it's definitely not apples-to-apples, and, because it's based on a timeline that includes a point of recession for the city (2009-2013 ish), it definitely doesn't capture the much more recent higher-paying job growth in Philly (which didn't hit its stride until at least 2014/2015).
As you suggest, it's all in how you frame the data.