Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH
That bank is slick. I realize that style is not everyone's cup of tea, but it is a great example of that era and should be protected.
|
Yeah, and not only is it valuable due to it being a great example of 1960s-era design, but also because it is a great example of mid-century
bank architecture, a fully-unique example of Mellon Bank architecture, and because its construction materials are very high-quality (much more so than what most of Pittsburgh's "Victorian" era architecture is composed of).
Some people might not appreciate it because it's not "quaint" or "cute" or "historic" in their minds. And that displays a very limited understanding of the art and science of building construction. Many "preservationists" will decry the destruction of a mass-produced, 1880s rowhouse made of rough brick and wood, with flimsy interior walls, yet will barely make a peep when a custom-built, mid-century commercial building made of glazed brick, terrazzo, heavy plate glass, and finish-grade aluminum alloy is threatened with demolition.
Banks were long-tme sponsors of innovative and lasting design in our cities, and now they trade only in "fast food architecture"... which is exactly what Citizens Bank is proposing for the site.