HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #36321  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2017, 7:45 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
This would be amazing:

Image from here with story: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...feb1-177183285
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36322  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2017, 8:09 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,917
Elevate Lincoln Park

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36323  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2017, 8:47 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten View Post
This would be amazing:

Image from here with story: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...feb1-177183285
It would be earth shaking - to see the sun up at that angle ;-)
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36324  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 4:02 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
I'm not sure I like that proposal. As it stands, Lake Shore Drive is one of the most beautiful urban vistas in the world, especially from behind the wheel. It's a reminder that driving in a city can be inspiring and uplifting and not just aggravating. Especially as a skyscraper fan, it would suck to lose that view for an underground chute.

Obviously the city needs to be designed for pedestrians and not just drivers, but this tunnel proposal will just make LSD into a concrete rat run like every other urban expressway. Hopefully there is some changes to the proposal to acknowledge that we live in the 21st century where highways are a reality that should be embraced and not swept under the rug (at tremendous cost).
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36325  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 4:08 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
There's no need worrying because it's never going to happen.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36326  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 4:09 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
At that point of the turn nobody is looking around enjoying the scenery...at least not for long or you are trading paint with some cars or concrete barriers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36327  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 4:28 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
I for one like flying through that corner at like 60 MPH. Great fun.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36328  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 4:31 AM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
At that point of the turn nobody is looking around enjoying the scenery...at least not for long or you are trading paint with some cars or concrete barriers.
Yes, that curve would definitely benefit from being rebuilt to a higher level of safety and since you are already rebuilding it, why not make the public space better at the same time?

On Monday night I drove home and there were two separate crashes, about 1000 feet away from each other, one before the curve and one after. Aside from light fog the road conditions were perfectly normal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36329  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 5:13 AM
danielschell's Avatar
danielschell danielschell is offline
Chicago picture-taker
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 171
Cook County Central Campus Health Center

Went by the Cook County Central Campus Health Center at Damen and Polk today. I'll have a post up on the blog in the morning, if anyone wants to see more photos.



__________________
buildingupchicago.com

Twitter: @buildupchicago
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36330  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 1:57 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Permit issued to construct new 4 story mixed use with 55 units and ground floor retail at 6253 S Cottage Grove Ave basically next to the Cottage Grove Green Line stop. Currently a vacant lot (https://www.google.com/maps/place/62...056c5a!6m1!1e1)

Good to see.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36331  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 2:18 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Permit issued to construct new 4 story mixed use with 55 units and ground floor retail at 6253 S Cottage Grove Ave basically next to the Cottage Grove Green Line stop. Currently a vacant lot (https://www.google.com/maps/place/62...056c5a!6m1!1e1)

Good to see.
What are the odds we can ever get the end of the Jackson Park branch re-extended out there? It seems downright foolish that they removed it in the first place, but even sillier now that the Obama Library will be there to have a line that dead ends like just outside of walking distance from a park which already houses a huge museum, but also a top 5 in the world university and now a presidential library. You'd think that between Obama and U of C they could come up with the money to stretch that line back out to Stony Island.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36332  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 2:33 PM
TimeAgain TimeAgain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Permit issued to construct new 4 story mixed use with 55 units and ground floor retail at 6253 S Cottage Grove Ave basically next to the Cottage Grove Green Line stop. Currently a vacant lot (https://www.google.com/maps/place/62...056c5a!6m1!1e1)

Good to see.
This was announced a while ago. Glad to see it's actually going through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36333  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 2:49 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
What are the odds we can ever get the end of the Jackson Park branch re-extended out there? It seems downright foolish that they removed it in the first place, but even sillier now that the Obama Library will be there to have a line that dead ends like just outside of walking distance from a park which already houses a huge museum, but also a top 5 in the world university and now a presidential library. You'd think that between Obama and U of C they could come up with the money to stretch that line back out to Stony Island.
I think a better and cheaper idea would be to run a rapid transit system off of the Metra Electric Line. There are two stops within a couple of blocks of the site of the Obama Library location. It also accomplishes a goal of placing an L stop near the museums, the south side of the lakeshore, the south side of Jackson Park, and all the way out to near the U.S. Steel South Works site. It serves so many locations along the lakeshore that are or will soon be developing. Maybe then you could tie it into the Green Line between Cottage Grove for those that need to get to the west or north sides. That would be quite an addition to the system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36334  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 2:57 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^. That's too good of an idea, hence our politicians will almost certainly never propose it.

You've gotta go with something 5 times more expensive and 3 times more useless, then get back to me
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36335  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 4:06 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I'm not sure I like that proposal. As it stands, Lake Shore Drive is one of the most beautiful urban vistas in the world, especially from behind the wheel. It's a reminder that driving in a city can be inspiring and uplifting and not just aggravating. Especially as a skyscraper fan, it would suck to lose that view for an underground chute.

Obviously the city needs to be designed for pedestrians and not just drivers, but this tunnel proposal will just make LSD into a concrete rat run like every other urban expressway. Hopefully there is some changes to the proposal to acknowledge that we live in the 21st century where highways are a reality that should be embraced and not swept under the rug (at tremendous cost).
Romanticizing it as such strikes me as odd, though, especially given the benefits of having it buried. "Embracing" highways should be more sensitively and thoughtfully incorporating them into the city so that their presence doesn't reign supreme and preclude the functionality of the areas adjacent to them, not leaving them on display to serve as strident reminders of maximizing efficiency.

The obvious benefit of the expanded park space is legible access to the lakefront for those N Michigan Avenue shoppers who otherwise wouldn't bother. If they can glimpse the edges of an oasis (sans highway) on their horizon, they're times over more likely to go and explore, and I'd rather have their eyeballs on those parts of the skyline than those of speeding motorists.

That being said, I'd rather have the money go towards a seamless connection between Grant Park and the lake (with improvements to the lakefront path between Oak and Ohio St. beaches).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36336  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 5:04 PM
Jim in Chicago Jim in Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 363
S/W Corner of Clark and Archer

I think we've chatted about this site before. At one point it had a big "hotel coming soon" sign, and over the past few months there's been a project to construct what looks like another strip mall.

There are now "for sale, for lease" signs up on the unfinished building. So it looks like someone built a stupid strip mall in an odd location on spec.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36337  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 6:16 PM
moorhosj moorhosj is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
I think a better and cheaper idea would be to run a rapid transit system off of the Metra Electric Line. There are two stops within a couple of blocks of the site of the Obama Library location. It also accomplishes a goal of placing an L stop near the museums, the south side of the lakeshore, the south side of Jackson Park, and all the way out to near the U.S. Steel South Works site. It serves so many locations along the lakeshore that are or will soon be developing. Maybe then you could tie it into the Green Line between Cottage Grove for those that need to get to the west or north sides. That would be quite an addition to the system.
Hinz mentioned this in a Crain's article a few weeks ago:

Quote:
With the Chicago Transit Authority focused on rebuilding the north end of its Red Line, increasing the frequency of Metra trains to CTA levels is the best hope of bringing good transit to McCormick Place, the new Barack Obama Presidential Center and the revitalizing mid-South Side lakefront. The CTA at one point actually considered a lease of sorts on part of the line. Efforts now are underway to put the project back on the front burner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36338  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 7:20 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten View Post
Some sort of this really is not toooo far fetched. The reality is the city needs to push lake waters further away from LSD at this point (and north of this) anyways. Storms lately have caused this section to be closed down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36339  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 8:11 PM
Rocket49 Rocket49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 163
^^ Looking at the drawing it appears that "tunnel" part of LSD would just run about 300 yards -- from about Division to about East LSD.

I think it's a great idea to increase the amount of land near the lake, to give more room for bike and pedestrian paths. And to make the area more storm resistant.

But why not save a few bucks and just keep LSD where it is now? The sharp bends they now have on LSD aren't a big issue since trucks are prohibited on the parkway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36340  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 8:13 PM
Freefall Freefall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Some sort of this really is not toooo far fetched. The reality is the city needs to push lake waters further away from LSD at this point (and north of this) anyways. Storms lately have caused this section to be closed down.
The Fullerton revetment is a mini version of this. I believe the Army Corps of Engineers paid for most of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:29 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.