Quote:
Originally Posted by DCReid
Austin's downtown was not 'nothing' but has gotten very big skyscrapers that altered the skyline.
Houston has not done too bad with downtown skyscrapers, but it had some big ones from the 1970s/80s so the new ones don't alter the skyline. Dallas seems to have gotten hardly nothing major downtown since its 80s boom. It's kind of surprising but perhaps the metro has always been more sprawling than the other TX cities
|
Of the big cities in TX, IMO, San Antonio's skyline I deem almost pathetic and embarrassing. The Dallas skyline is lacking, lacking something, never found the Dallas skyline attractive. Never much cared for the Austin skyline even with the new towers. Houston, in my books, is the clear cut winner for an attractive skyline. A sucker for curved buildings, Houston has them in the downtown area and elsewhere.
Dallas' tallest looks cheap, as if the developer was on a tight budget. It's a shame it's the focal point of the skyline.