HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1821  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 12:25 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,361
Children's Museum

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/5...seum09.article

Quote:
Pritzker lobbies aldermen on museum site
GRANT PARK | No sign of compromise -- vote may be in Nov.


October 9, 2007
BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter/fspielman@suntimes.com

Jean "Gigi" Pritzker, billionaire board president of the Chicago Children's Museum, has been meeting privately with aldermen individually to persuade them to approve a new children's museum in Grant Park over the objections of Ald. Brendan Reilly (42nd).

Aldermen lobbied so far said Pritzker and children's museum Vice President Jim Law, the city's former special events director, plan to forsake compromise and forge ahead with Plan Commission approval as early as next month with Mayor Daley's blessing.
I am curious what exact locations in the South Loop Reilly has in mind. For some reason I think his Museum Campus or Northerly are going to pass the mustard either.

If only they had planned a few years earlier maybe it could have provided a nice low rise streetwall in front of the Grant Park towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1822  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 1:41 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,670
Just for hilarity's sake, why not put the darn thing in "The Park at Lake Shore East"; doing so would quench Daley's desire to spank the LSE NIMBY contingent and would also draw the public's attention to this nifty new park resource.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1823  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 1:48 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Yeah. Or, the LSE developers could trade some land for the museum in exchange for zoning variance to build a supertall. Wouldn't that be ideal? They could integrate the museum with the school they have planned into a little people's cultural tower, say 8 floors or so.

Now, Pritzker running around the city meeting with Aldermen, that's really something. I wonder why she's so set on this stupid site anyway. Could it be spoiled billionaire syndrome (SBS)?

Last edited by honte; Oct 9, 2007 at 4:25 PM. Reason: This is what my message was supposed to say - annoying forum errors!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1824  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 3:39 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,213
Good Idea! Put it in one of the 'shoulder wings' of the Archetonica.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1825  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 3:53 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,670
Lynn Becker (http://arcchicago.blogspot.com/) has posted a hyperlink to an online petition against locating the Children's Museum in Grant Park; you can also find the petition here: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/...rant-park.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1826  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 4:35 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
I was thinking that the Cacciatore property on the river South of River City could be a workable site for the Childrens Museum. It's between Roosevelt and Taylor, Wells and the river.

If underground parking could be workable so close to the water, this site provides some interesting opportunities:

It could spur the development of the Taylor street bridge project. The Western viaduct for this bridge has already been constructed at Southgate Market across the river.

The bridge would allow vehicle and bus traffic to the museum to be routed directly to the museum from the Downtown Expressway at the Taylor Street exit. No museum traffic would clog surface streets.

The museum development would create another segment of Riverwalk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1827  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 10:05 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loopy View Post
I was thinking that the Cacciatore property on the river South of River City could be a workable site for the Childrens Museum. It's between Roosevelt and Taylor, Wells and the river.

Or maybe for a casino..... {hint?}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1828  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 11:23 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheeErin View Post
This morning Robinette Demolition put up their dumpsters in front of the Dunham Building. I talked to a couple of guys on the ground who confirmed the building is coming down. They didn't know what was going in its place.
Chiman on SSC found a piece of info on SOAR's website:

http://soarchicago.org/News_Views/details.cfm?NID=43

Northwestern Memorial Hospital Announces Demolition Schedules

SOAR was alerted this morning regarding the demolition schedule for Northwestern Memorial Hospital's buildings at 400 E. Ontario (at McClurg) and 450 E. Ohio (just west of Lake Shore Drive.) Demolition activities will begin this week, starting with placement of barriers, scaffolding and fencing. This work will continue into next week. Demolition for these two buildings and the Huron Street Bridge is expected to be completed the week of November 19. For information: Bridget Orth at borth@nmh.org or Steven Zalesny at (312)926-2308 or szalesny@nmh.org.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1829  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 11:45 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loopy View Post
I was thinking that the Cacciatore property on the river South of River City could be a workable site for the Childrens Museum. It's between Roosevelt and Taylor, Wells and the river.

If underground parking could be workable so close to the water, this site provides some interesting opportunities:
Unfortunately, it's really not workable. It's barely workable in Chicago when you're blocks away from the river, let alone right up against it. That's why River North and Streeterville are flooded with parking podiums - the high water table in Chicago (we ARE built on a swamp, remember) makes the cost of underground parking RIDICULOUSLY high. There are ways to fake underground parking, like they did at Illinois Center.

What the Childrens' Museum can do in that location is
a) pay to utilize Roosevelt Collection's garage
b) design a tasteful parking garage on the site of the surface lot south of River City
c) build tasteful surface lots beneath the Roosevelt Road viaduct.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1830  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2007, 11:46 PM
Marcu Marcu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
Or maybe for a casino..... {hint?}
Do you know something we don't?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1831  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 2:17 AM
kalmia's Avatar
kalmia kalmia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hammond, Indiana
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Unfortunately, it's really not workable. It's barely workable in Chicago when you're blocks away from the river, let alone right up against it. That's why River North and Streeterville are flooded with parking podiums - the high water table in Chicago (we ARE built on a swamp, remember) makes the cost of underground parking RIDICULOUSLY high. There are ways to fake underground parking, like they did at Illinois Center.

What the Childrens' Museum can do in that location is
a) pay to utilize Roosevelt Collection's garage
b) design a tasteful parking garage on the site of the surface lot south of River City
c) build tasteful surface lots beneath the Roosevelt Road viaduct.
It would be nice if there were more elevated, multilevel streets to allow more below street level parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1832  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 2:49 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Chiman on SSC found a piece of info on SOAR's website:

http://soarchicago.org/News_Views/details.cfm?NID=43

Northwestern Memorial Hospital Announces Demolition Schedules

SOAR was alerted this morning regarding the demolition schedule for Northwestern Memorial Hospital's buildings at 400 E. Ontario (at McClurg) and 450 E. Ohio (just west of Lake Shore Drive.) Demolition activities will begin this week, starting with placement of barriers, scaffolding and fencing. This work will continue into next week. Demolition for these two buildings and the Huron Street Bridge is expected to be completed the week of November 19. For information: Bridget Orth at borth@nmh.org or Steven Zalesny at (312)926-2308 or szalesny@nmh.org.
Well, that really sucks. 400 E. Ontario is my favorite small modern building in Streeterville (ignore the awning addition). Never knew who designed it, if anyone might have that info.

The other property isn't great, but it's right next to the Dunham Building. Mere coincidence? I doubt it. I don't suppose we might be seeing a new sterile NW building there some day, or better yet, perhaps a parking garage?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1833  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 2:52 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalmia View Post
It would be nice if there were more elevated, multilevel streets to allow more below street level parking.
Which is exactly the point of Roosevelt Collection.

Wells might work as a two-level street. It would basically be a long ramp starting at River City and going up to meet Taylor Street, and then extending south to Roosevelt. Unfortunately, Roosevelt Collection plans retail along Wells at grade level, meaning that any street raisings there would block those businesses.

Elevating Wells would also succeed in establishing the semblance of a streetgrid in that area, euphemistically referred to as "LaSalle Park". If done properly, it could also form a safe pedestrian passage from Printers' Row and the Loop to the Roosevelt Corridor.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1834  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 6:21 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
Well, that really sucks. 400 E. Ontario is my favorite small modern building in Streeterville (ignore the awning addition). Never knew who designed it, if anyone might have that info.

The other property isn't great, but it's right next to the Dunham Building. Mere coincidence? I doubt it. I don't suppose we might be seeing a new sterile NW building there some day, or better yet, perhaps a parking garage?!
Honte, 450 E. Ohio in fact is the Dunham Building itself, if I'm not mistaken. You're probably thinking of the one- or two-story building just west of the Dunham Building, but that's NMH's magnetic resonance facility (it has an Ontario Street address -- something like 441 E. Ontario).

So either the SOAR posting means that the Dunham Building is in fact owned by NMH, or the SOAR posting was wrong in saying that 450 E. Ohio is a NMH building, or (least likely) the SOAR posting was wrong in giving NMH's other demolition project as 450 E. Ohio and should have said that 441 E. Ontario is being demolished.

With the CBS studios building likely to be demolished early next year, the landscape in that corner of Streeterville will be looking drastically different - and for a while, but hopefully only a short while, barren.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1835  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 12:41 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ OK, got it, thanks. In that case, I would expect that NW did buy the Dunham building, and they will combine it with the resonance building later for something large.

Man, these guys seem like they are out to demolish every old building in Streeterville. Don't forget they are talking about the giant old VA hospital too. I guess an 80-story hospital isn't workable, but what about, say, a 35-story one? Multi-use, renovatable instead of landfill material in 30 years? It seems like their planning lasts for about 30 minutes, with little consideration for the rest of the neighborhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1836  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2007, 2:01 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^ That's why I'm glad that Reilly injected a bit of reality into their faces regarding the Lakeshore Athletic Club
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1837  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 2:49 PM
BWChicago's Avatar
BWChicago BWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 486
I dug up the 1925 tribune article announcing the Dunham project: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bwchicago/1542201965/ . Apparently it was a DH Burnham Co. design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1838  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 4:29 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWChicago View Post
I dug up the 1925 tribune article announcing the Dunham project: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bwchicago/1542201965/ . Apparently it was a DH Burnham Co. design.
Great find, and all the more alarming that a Burnham is getting torn down. This really flew under the radar, were there even any suspicions before the scaffolding went up?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1839  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 5:24 PM
steel's Avatar
steel steel is offline
try being in the Buff
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,254
North Avenue Bridge reconstruction with new cable stay span - Web cam

http://www.astekcams.com/webcam_live.asp?camid=6
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1840  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2007, 5:53 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
Great find, and all the more alarming that a Burnham is getting torn down. This really flew under the radar, were there even any suspicions before the scaffolding went up?
I've been asking around, and from what I can tell, this was a surprise to everyone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.