HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3641  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2015, 7:54 PM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
I couldn't describe what Ottawa and Quebec City's skylines look like. Nothing comes to mind. Only CN Tower and Harbour Centre/Canada Place really stick out, but I see Harbour Centre/Canada Place from my condo so I am biased on that.

012_TOITS_JLR_4369 by Jean-Luc Riendeau, on Flickr


Last Year by Hoan, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3642  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2015, 8:08 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,791
I would actually put QC's skyline (silhouette) at #2 tied with Montreal behind Toronto for most recognizable in Canada.

Last edited by TorontoDrew; Oct 5, 2015 at 8:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3643  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2015, 11:46 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,811
Edmonton with Encore Tower (tall slim middle one) photoshopped in, 40 storeys at 130m.


encoretower.com
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3644  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 12:54 AM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
In the 1970's to the early 1980's Toronto was "That City"

Now Toronto has regressed back its conservative design idology.
Do you really think so? There are dozens of large scale projects going on right now that couldn't be described as conservative. Both One Bloor projects (east and west), Mirvish/Gehry, the Well, L Tower, 1 Yonge St, the Ryerson learning centre, 385 Yonge, and Ice to name a few. And in the not so distant past you have cultural projects like the ROM, AGO, OCAD, Sugar Beach, HTO, and even Dundas Square.

Sure you could argue that those are exceptions and most new buildings are pretty mundane. But that's no different from the 70s, with the hundreds upon hundreds of commieblock apartment buildings that were being copied and pasted all over the city back then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3645  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 1:06 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,170
Well the majority of the individual buildings, are pretty cookie-cutter. What is transformative is the overall effect including the towers and cultural projects you mentioned. That is not conservative at all, but a bold change in a positive direction for urban living in Toronto.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3646  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 1:06 AM
bkd bkd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Edmonton with Encore Tower (tall slim middle one) photoshopped in, 40 storeys at 130m.


encoretower.com
Encore looks good. What's the 411 on this beauty?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3647  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 1:12 AM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Well the majority of the individual buildings, are pretty cookie-cutter. What is transformative is the overall effect including the towers and cultural projects you mentioned. That is not conservative at all, but a bold change in a positive direction for urban living in Toronto.
Yes but like I said, the majority were cookie cutter in the 70s too, more so than today IMO. I completely agree that the direction the city is going is positive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3648  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 1:11 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,811
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3649  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 4:17 PM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Canadian cities are extremely generic. We don't really do big and bold.

I couldn't describe what Ottawa and Quebec City's skylines look like. Nothing comes to mind. Only CN Tower and Harbour Centre/Canada Place really stick out, but I see Harbour Centre/Canada Place from my condo so I am biased on that.
Canadian cities are phenomenally generic, that you are right. No other country is getting more flattened by the roller of cultural/social uniformity as Canada. But ironically, Ottawa and Quebec City have by far the 2 most unique skylines in the country.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3650  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 5:50 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,811

Courtesy of Whyteknight/M.Z. commissioned by myself
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3651  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 6:06 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,170
Those few towers are gonna make a big impact on Edmonton's skyline. Edmonton can't move up the list but it should have #4 or #5 in Canada locked down with that...


Sidenote: We now officially destroy Australia on skylines city to city. They can't compete with this...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3652  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 8:37 PM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister F View Post
Do you really think so? There are dozens of large scale projects going on right now that couldn't be described as conservative. Both One Bloor projects (east and west), Mirvish/Gehry, the Well, L Tower, 1 Yonge St, the Ryerson learning centre, 385 Yonge, and Ice to name a few. And in the not so distant past you have cultural projects like the ROM, AGO, OCAD, Sugar Beach, HTO, and even Dundas Square.

Sure you could argue that those are exceptions and most new buildings are pretty mundane. But that's no different from the 70s, with the hundreds upon hundreds of commieblock apartment buildings that were being copied and pasted all over the city back then.
True enough, but something as big and audacious as the CN Tower would not be conceived of today, let alone built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3653  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 8:44 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post

Courtesy of Whyteknight/M.Z. commissioned by myself
This isn't a pipe dream either, these are all U/C or nearing U/C

EDIT: Except 102st Center. the curvy fat one in between the two taller ones. my bad.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3654  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 8:48 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,007
The CN Tower was absolutely necessary at the time and continues to be an important piece of infrastructure today. Of course, it would be built today under similar circumstance. The dome which makes the CN Tower downright timid probably wouldn't. It is a once in a generation build. It doesn't compare well to the combined civic improvements made in the last five years. At some point, we'll run out of baby improvements and put everything into a big one again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3655  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 8:49 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post

Courtesy of Whyteknight/M.Z. commissioned by myself
Poor Manulife 2 (I think that is what it is called to the right of Stantec). Wasn't that the next big project slated for downtown. I seem to recall it being pretty exciting, a new tallest and then the whole Ice District pops up blowing everything else away essentially giving Edmonton a whole new skyline overnight.

Looks awesome though.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3656  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 9:21 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
What are the towers on the far right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3657  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 9:31 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
What are the towers on the far right?
Healy ford towers
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3658  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2015, 9:32 PM
Harrij's Avatar
Harrij Harrij is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 151
The two clumped together on the west edge are part of a three tower development on the former Healy Ford dealership site. Not pictured is the tallest of the three which will be about 48 stories.

The other two are both Brad Lamb comdos. The shorter one, Jasper house, is a couple blocks south of the rest and is currently waiting for more sales to proceed towards construction. The taller one isn't on the market yet and hasn't been finalized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3659  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2015, 1:33 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Thanks for the reply.

Edmonton will have an iconic skyline in only a couple of years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3660  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2015, 3:09 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
I'm very impressed the proposals in Edmonton! They're "Game Changers" IMO! I just hope they get built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.